Discovery may lead to a review of the theory of evolution

[porchrat]

I did not say its science, its a load of crap as far as i am concerned. They say science is full of holes and "god" created everything because all of them are brainless, however I will discuss it and explain it in a civil manner with use of science.

If something isn't science then it doesn't belong here. If you want to debate creationism (which is undoubtedly going to contain bucketloads of philsophical, religious and metaphysical garage) go to PD. It is an entire section devoted to nothing but this sort of junk.

 

[CoolBug]

Because you don't know the answer.

I don't know but more importantly, I don't care.

I say again, it's a stupid question.

Do you care about what made the unicorns extinct?

 

[buyeye]

I don't know but more importantly, I don't care.

I say again, it's a stupid question.

Do you care about what made the unicorns extinct?

/^points at troll post.^

 

[CoolBug]

/^points at troll post.^

Nope.

Philosophy in Natural Science is trolling.

Unfortunately some people can't get the idea that their philosophy is just that and nothing more.

Creationism and ID are philosophy and are not falsifiable, therefore, not science ergo this rubbish doesn't belong here.

Seriously, how hard is this to understand?

You don't talk about Android or iOS here, so why talk about philosophy?

Oh wait, of course, it's because some people are insecure about their philosophical beliefs, simple as that.

 

[SaiyanZ]

/^points at troll post.^

The biggest trolls ever are the people who wrote all the religious scriptures thousands of years ago. Trolled billions of people and still going strong. No troll in this day and age can compete with that.

 

[CoolBug]

The biggest trolls ever are the people who wrote all the religious scriptures thousands of years ago. Trolled billions of people and still going strong. No troll in this day and age can compete with that.

Wow you are actually right.

I must say... Well played.

As a troll myself I should prayer to these ancestor trolls of mine. I always wondered of the common ancestor of my infinitely glorious homo trollapien species and you puny humans.

 

[Swa]

I did not say its science, its a load of crap as far as i am concerned. They say science is full of holes and "god" created everything because all of them are brainless, however I will discuss it and explain it in a civil manner with use of science. I can easily ignore them and im aware by engaging in debate Im giving them a sense of importance, like i care about their nonsensical gods and goblins. Shame though, even if their is no hope I will try and educate these apes to understand the real natural world, not lord of the rings bible ed ect ect ect.

You could argue a creationist/ID fool is the missing link between a human and an ape lol

Care to answer the question then and lay to rest your crap? Your judgmental condescending attitude speaks volumes though.

-Im new so the level of intelligence and delusion of Swa has me very interested , His delusional ideal on thermodynamics shows me he probably never did mathematics behind it.
-His "evidence" that never comes to light in a decent point form.
-And his attitude that I dodge his questions and that asking questions about what I've said provides evidence ?!?!? lol if he was my student i'd fail him in an instant. Love these guys who argue out of context nit pick then claim "straws" because they dont understand and THINK they know how real science works when they havent put a foot in a lab how pathetic

Glad I wasn't your student then and had a real teacher. Funny enough my marks were some of the best in class so go figure.

I don't know but more importantly, I don't care.

I say again, it's a stupid question.

There we have it then.

Nope.

Philosophy in Natural Science is trolling.

Unfortunately some people can't get the idea that their philosophy is just that and nothing more.

Creationism and ID are philosophy and are not falsifiable, therefore, not science ergo this rubbish doesn't belong here.

Seriously, how hard is this to understand?

You don't talk about Android or iOS here, so why talk about philosophy?

Oh wait, of course, it's because some people are insecure about their philosophical beliefs, simple as that.

You seriously don't get it. Your entire scientific realm is held together by philosophy. Your theories on evolution are based on the most philosophy. You only have a problem discussing that philosophy when it differs from your view. Stop trolling.

 

[RiaX]

Care to answer the question then and lay to rest your crap? Your judgmental condescending attitude speaks volumes though.

I did you just missed it about 6 times.

Best in the class hey? school doesnt count

 

[Swa]

I did you just missed it about 6 times.

Best in the class hey? school doesnt count

Maybe I missed it then with all the crap posted in between. Care to point to what you posted?

 

[RiaX]

go back and read it, im done. There is a limit to blindness and ignorance. The evidence is there you dont see it because you dont have the mental capacity to understand it, there is no way around it.

so sad best in the class but you cant read dafuq :?

 

[CoolBug]

go back and read it, im done. There is a limit to blindness and ignorance. The evidence is there you dont see it because you dont have the mental capacity to understand it, there is no way around it.

so sad best in the class but you cant read dafuq :?

I think it's more arrogance than ignorance.

I did try warn you when you first got into this, there really is no hope of some people seeing the light.

It's more about winning their argument.

I really can see why some have started putting them on ignore.

 

[Swa]

go back and read it, im done. There is a limit to blindness and ignorance. The evidence is there you dont see it because you dont have the mental capacity to understand it, there is no way around it.

so sad best in the class but you cant read dafuq :?

I really can't find where you posted the answer. What's so hard in just pointing to a it?

 

[Techne]

Nope.

Philosophy in Natural Science is trolling.

Unfortunately some people can't get the idea that their philosophy is just that and nothing more.

Do you think that perhaps you and other that continue to moan about philosophy in this section could be more consistent in berating philosophical views, including anti-religious, anti-creationist, anti-teleological etc. especially in this section.

For example this or this. Quite often people post this kind of claptrap and confuse it with science...

Anyway, more interesting stuff:

Epigenomes of Newborns and Centenarians Differ: New Clues to Increasing Life Span

 

[porchrat]

Do you think that perhaps you and other that continue to moan about philosophy in this section could be more consistent in berating philosophical views, including anti-religious, anti-creationist, anti-teleological etc. especially in this section.

For example this or this. Quite often people post this kind of claptrap and confuse it with science...

Anyway, more interesting stuff:

Epigenomes of Newborns and Centenarians Differ: New Clues to Increasing Life Span

Report the fsckers. I beg you. You yourself have agreed that this stuff doesn't belong here. Help get rid of it. I certainly can't keep track of it all on my own.

 

[Techne]

Report the fsckers. I beg you. You yourself have agreed that this stuff doesn't belong here. Help get rid of it. I certainly can't keep track of it all on my own.

You have now two instances you can report... if you want to be unbiased and consistent.

 

[RiaX]

I really can't find where you posted the answer. What's so hard in just pointing to a it?

][video=youtube;dK3O6KYPmEw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK3O6KYPmEw&feature=related[/video]

that one piece of evidence I quoted the rest you can find yourself

 

[porchrat]

You have now two instances you can report... if you want to be unbiased and consistent.

Done and done. Please do so as well because in my experience my reporting alone doesn't seem to be enough to get these idiots warned or to have their garbage removed. This crap needs to stop.

 

[CoolBug]

Rofl I don't mind if you report me, as long as we stop with all the science hate, why come to a science forum and start hating science?

Also please can we all keep the discussion constructive, honest, open, non bias and of course, how science should be, skeptical.

Thanks.

 

[Swa]

that one piece of evidence I quoted the rest you can find yourself

I'm lost. That does not seem to answer the question

I am curious. Let's for argument sake consider the following scenario.
1) The Modern Evolutionary Synthesis, or Phyletic Gradualism has been debunked.
2) Irreducible complexity or Complex Specified Information has been demonstrated to be true for some biological structures.
3) Therefore, Intelligent Design is true for some biological structures.

Now what? What further can you conclude from this? Where do you see this kind of result end up?

 

[rwenzori]

I am curious. Let's for argument sake consider the following scenario.
1) The Modern Evolutionary Synthesis, or Phyletic Gradualism has been debunked.
2) Irreducible complexity or Complex Specified Information has been demonstrated to be true for some biological structures.
3) Therefore, Intelligent Design is true for some biological structures.

Now what? What further can you conclude from this? Where do you see this kind of result end up?

That someone has been listening to idiots from the Discovery Institute?