rambo919
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 21,212
Because society is sick. Divorce is an enemy not a friend, it's not the convenient way out people pretend it is.The majority of marriages don’t last. And when people couldn’t get divorced they simply lived in misery or had outside relationships.
That does nothing to address the simple math that the less people have children the less children there are. Prosperity itself does nothing to reduce offspring... the problem is it goes to peoples heads and they alter their behaviour according to their inflated ego's, the result is decadence.Perhaps if you happen to live in some ancient civilisation, but in reality even there it wouldn’t be true. Prosperity seems to reduce offspring though, so maybe we should keep everyone poor.
No I just stripped off all the extra's and went to the core. Anything more is religion.What you’re talking about is some sort of simplistic nonsense version of evolution.
No, you are conflating a primitive flawed science with all of science.Even assuming that claim is true medicine in general does the same. So you’re saying we should be striving to increase infant and childhood death rates.
I am not speaking of modern medicine generally though, this is a strawman.No it would not be detrimental to survival. Even in the absence of modern medicine genetic quality would not be inferior. However if your strange conception of evolution were true the human race would already have been extinct within the last 100 years.
I am speaking of the use of an emergency procedure as a matter of course.... it's like poking holes in throats for airflow when an oxygen tank will work better.