where is your proof of this shock link us a pic there shockie
lets i had an amd 2200+
1700+ didnt overclock it had a crappy board
2600+ about 250 cpu was so hot i have to buy a better cooler
3000+ 754 300 best i could do
3200+939 400 more was the best i could do, that broke and i had to pay rectron 400 rand more for
3400+ 350
3800+ dual core couldnt get more than 300 out of it and neither could anyone else that i looked up
core 2 1.83 @ 3.22ghz got it to 2.8 with air
im not really a noob when it comes to overclocking, and i used to be a massive AMD fan i only bought amd, but things change, you seem to die a hard fan boi even though they are far behind the comp at the moment
if amd's new cpu's are better than intel i'll buy it, but i do not defend a company that has worse product, does not make sense to do so
but i really wanna see those pics of that overclock shock g because its pretty unbelievable
http://www.xyzcomputing.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t8.html
such a high overclock without watercooling shock lol
ok if ya say so
still would love to see those pics and i wonder could the pc actually function or just boot up for tests, no point getting a cpu to that speed without the pc being able to function whats the point then?
shock you submit that it would be a world record and an even better record considering you didnt use watercooling
also plz post some links of amd's that actually get more than 500-600mhz more? that can actually be used in every day life, no use overclocking a cpu to extreme lengths only to find your pc doesnt work lol
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Features/XP-M/
wow 1.83 to 3.6ghz highly doubt it though
o and plz stop telling everyone that amd is still good, amd does not overclock well that is a fact
i understand you support amd even though they are way behind but telling ppl things that are not true is not right man
what other amd cpu's are out now that can overclock more than 600mhz? would love to know
