Have tried both. Repeatedly because I initially refused to believe the results.
Push HARD in my pocket rocket (Opel Corsa OPC) vs drive like a pensioner and the time saving is between 5 and 8 minutes over a distance 16km.
Its NOT a significant enough time saving to warrant the dangers associated with pi$$ing off the populous and risking life and limb. So I stick to something between Miss Daily and Mr Schumacher.
On 2 wheels however - the difference is MARKED. Even a slight increase in pace on 2 wheels equates to a MAJOR difference of "on the road time". The inherent dangers of 2 wheels are themselves debatable and probably best saved for another thread.
5-8 minutes is a massive difference over 16km.
Bumper to Bumper through Gillooly's interchange on the N3. Its takes a LOT of "pushing" to achieve this. It's really not worth it.
Only time its faster for me is if leave early or late. Driving faster does not actually make much of a difference other than 2-5 min plus add risk of fines, accident etc not that i drive slow.. but i find that since i stick to the limit, the time taken to get to any place is pretty consistent and only traffic + route is the deciding factor
As title states.
Me?
About the same, morning run is robot->robot so not much changes.
Afternoon is slightly faster as I take the freeway and I do push it quite a bit
How about yourself?
Does it matter?
The real question is this:
If you're traveling in a car at 120kmph will you get home faster than a guy with a truck traveling at 120?
I still don't understand how slow and steady could ever possibly get you there faster than driving faster?
ELI5.
I still don't understand how slow and steady could ever possibly get you there faster than driving faster?
ELI5.