AfricanTech
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2010
- Messages
- 40,413
Robots. Time or Speed doesn't factor for me. Leave at 6,7 or 8.
Still takes 20 minutes to get to the office.
OR
Wind resistance
Treffic lights, ffs, treffic lights!
Robots. Time or Speed doesn't factor for me. Leave at 6,7 or 8.
Still takes 20 minutes to get to the office.
OR
Wind resistance
The "elastic band effect". You race off at 150-170km/h while Doris plods along at 100km/h. You get to the robot before her. She catches you up within a minute or two. She stops 5 cars behind you. You race off at 100km/h and she dawdles along at 50km/h. You get stopped at the next red light. She doesn't because shes driving slow and hits all the green lights in succession (because SA robots are timed as ONLY an inept government could). This keeps extrapolating. You race off. She catches you a few minutes later (albeit behind 5 or 7 cars). And after a 20 minutes drive home... in reality she parks her car only 5 minutes after you. Except its your clutch and tires that are smoking and your life that was on the line numerous times during the drive.
I still don't understand how slow and steady could ever possibly get you there faster than driving faster?
ELI5.
The "elastic band effect". You race off at 150-170km/h while Doris plods along at 100km/h. You get to the robot before her. She catches you up within a minute or two. She stops 5 cars behind you. You race off at 100km/h and she dawdles along at 50km/h. You get stopped at the next red light. She doesn't because shes driving slow and hits all the green lights in succession (because SA robots are timed as ONLY an inept government could). This keeps extrapolating. You race off. She catches you a few minutes later (albeit behind 5 or 7 cars). And after a 20 minutes drive home... in reality she parks her car only 5 minutes after you. Except its your clutch and tires that are smoking and your life that was on the line numerous times during the drive.
The real question is this:
If you're traveling in a car at 120kmph will you get home faster than a guy with a truck traveling at 120?
The "elastic band effect". You race off at 150-170km/h while Doris plods along at 100km/h. You get to the robot before her. She catches you up within a minute or two. She stops 5 cars behind you. You race off at 100km/h and she dawdles along at 50km/h. You get stopped at the next red light. She doesn't because shes driving slow and hits all the green lights in succession (because SA robots are timed as ONLY an inept government could). This keeps extrapolating. You race off. She catches you a few minutes later (albeit behind 5 or 7 cars). And after a 20 minutes drive home... in reality she parks her car only 5 minutes after you. Except its your clutch and tires that are smoking and your life that was on the line numerous times during the drive.
Now the deeper question is does changing lanes the whole time versus simply staying in the same lane all the way make any difference?
I find that the same lane gets you there faster but again only slightly.
It just feels like it takes longer as you don't have all that much to do.
IMHO: Lane changers are a leading cause of congestion.
http://www.smartmotorist.com/traffic-and-safety-guideline/traffic-jams.html
Pretty sure slow and steady will win over time, all you need is one accident and you would lose years worth of gained time from driving fast.
I saw what you did there![]()
"Going faster only means you are enjoying your drive more than the one going slow" - abzo
You mean to tell me you can choose how fast you want to drive? Lucky you, me on the other hand can only drive as fast as the oke in front of me, and him as fast as the oke in front of him and so it goes on... speed is limited by the amount of traffic... and there is always traffic![]()