scudsucker
Executive Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 9,024
I agree completely.
I haven't seen a shred of evidence presented in this thread, that LSD from a drug dealer is dangerous...
Ok im just going to say what everyone is thinking , i dont think Riax has the expertise that he claims to have. He has made too many incorrect statements in the last few pages.
I believe he is qualified too. The dangers of psychedelic drugs are exaggerated, and no benefits are ever admitted, of course to justify their classification as Schedule 1. His views are shared by most medical professionals and most people.I'm inclined to believe that RiaX has qualifications related to this discussion.
Yeah.This does not make his utterances any more correct though, especially given the attitude of 'I'm a professional, therefore my opinion is worth more than yours, even though I don't deem it necessary to actually back up all the claims I make'.
On the contrary, the surveys on purity of street LSD I have found have proved the opposite.
I'm inclined to believe that RiaX has qualifications related to this discussion.
This does not make his utterances any more correct though, especially given the attitude of 'I'm a professional, therefore my opinion is worth more than yours, even though I don't deem it necessary to actually back up all the claims I make'.
ALbert Hoffman worked for a massive pharmaceutical company ?
MAO in found in the synaptic celfts of neurons and has nothing to do with oral ingestion. Your sight is some what inaccurate with regards to SSRIs. You do get orally available 5-HT agonists, however oral 5-HT itself I dont think so, again was theorising
Back to the original topic.. I think Riax would benefit from taking a half dose in a controlled environment.
Back to the original topic.. I think Riax would benefit from taking a half dose in a controlled environment.
http://www.leshengliu.com/Drug Publications Set & Setting.htmlPerson (the Set)
Physical factors such as body weight, sex, race, current health conditions, illnesses or diseases, medication intake, and genetic makeup.
Level of experience with the exact drug, drugs of the same type, drugs in general, or using drugs within certain contexts.
Tolerance level of specific drug, usually influenced by level of experience and physical factors, especially body weight and genetic makeup.
Current emotional and mental state, such as depression, anger, stress, recent trauma, or psychological disorders.
Type and level of drug education received
Expectations (or lack of), as well as intentions, regarding pending drug use, how the effects should feel, and what the experience will be like.
Personality, ideological opinions, and things of interest, often influences intentions and expectations.
Predisposition to physical addiction, likely influenced by genetics, personality, and tolerance.
Context (the Setting)
Place (i.e. at home, at a party, at the doctor’s office, on the streets, at work, etc).
Characteristics of environment, including the presence of music or other sounds, weather conditions, type of area (i.e. suburbs, industrial district, inner city, woods, beach, etc), whether it’s indoor/outdoor, and perimeter or tightness of setting.
Time, such as day or night, which season, day of the week, etc.
Amount of surrounding people (if any), plus types of individuals, crowdedness, and whether communication, interaction, or recreation takes place among group.
Culture, such as age group, ideology, race, common activities, and even the country of use.
Reason for drug experience (i.e. to undergo surgery, as medicine, to relax, for therapy, for recreation, as religious practice, to stay up or get work done, as a subject of research, unexpectedly/unwittingly, without consent, etc).
Would you like to link to a cite showing the toxic and/or harmful additives/byproducts present in LSD sold to the public?
I find it hard to believe that a drug specialist doesn't know about some of the things that were said here which was just common knowledge. Not worth the argument though i suppose.
Dont be dumb. This is made on the streets they dont exactly PUBLISH their intellectual trade. OMW, you sir are a con artist's dream
At the highest levels of the traffic, where LSD crystal is purchased in gram or multigram quantities from wholesale sources of supply, it rarely is diluted with adulterants, a common practice with cocaine, heroin, and other illicit drugs.
I don't, but that doesn't matter to me. As we've explained, there just isn't much sense in adulterating your LSD. I've seen other surveys too. You still haven't got any evidencehehehe, USA documents and how you know your lsd isnt made locally? or from china, india, cuba ?
No thanks, I certainly wouldn't mind but I'm not going to. I've read about several methods thank you. The precursors are too hard to obtain, and I don't have enough chemistry experience currently.Let me explain to you the methods of producing LSD at homeyou wont be able to make it anyways so no point hiding it. Will do it later I gtg for lunch D:
hehehe, USA documents and how you know your lsd isnt made locally? or from china, india, cuba ?
Let me explain to you the methods of producing LSD at homeyou wont be able to make it anyways so no point hiding it. Will do it later I gtg for lunch D:
Dont be dumb. This is made on the streets they dont exactly PUBLISH their intellectual trade. OMW, you sir are a con artist's dream
Dont be dumb. This is made on the streets they dont exactly PUBLISH their intellectual trade. OMW, you sir are a con artist's dream
LOL, that's rich, coming from a guy who thinks we must all wear cologne everyday of our lives - you sir are a con artist's dreamDont be dumb. This is made on the streets they dont exactly PUBLISH their intellectual trade. OMW, you sir are a con artist's dream