If the despots in our beloved government attempted to at least provide clear and transparent reasoning for their decisions, their decisions may have found more support. But, yes, these are the people that brought you Zuma, the Guptas, Eskom, SAA and more.
The actual reasoning behind the ban makes somewhat sense, but again, with 3000 infections as of today and 50 odd deaths, do we really need to have had more beds available?
Also, take a leaf out of the history books. What was the net result of prohibition in the USA?
Organised crime.
Now we have made criminals out of ordinary citizens, smugglers, and criminals out of the shop owners, created a whole new criminal sector for bootleggers and profiteering.
Substance abusers will find a way to get their fix. Did the war on drugs teach these idiots nothing? I know of people in Western Cape townships living on government grants willing to pay exorbitant fees for liquor from their grocery budget.
So no. Alcohol should not be banned.