Science does not blind.I answer you honestly and agree that I accuse people of being blinded by faith because like Rambo was doing in post 233 he smuggled in the word faith.
You want to accuse me of being blinded by science but thats where the facts are so call me whatever you want.
Me pointing out Kent Hovin who is a scientism master and see your points of view which match those was my point.
So we may be speaking past each other or you may be missing my points.
You engage me so you can call me a Dumb #$%^ and then say I'm trolling thats a bit far think I have to drop a report on that.Yup - should have known better.
So why should I accept what you call science.?Science does not blind.
'Tis "scientism" that blinds.
I did not call you that.You engage me so you can call me a Dumb #$%^ and then say I'm trolling thats a bit far think I have to drop a report on that.
It's not what I call science.So why should I accept what you call science.?
Do you answer anything Honestly?
More Ad hominemI did not call you that.
You are overly eager to wear the shoe.
Then again, if the shoe fits ........
I won't be surprised if you lodge a cry-baby complaint with the moderators.
Hopefully they will see it for what it is - hopefully.
If not, I'm outa here - and this time it will be for good.
Ok is Hydrological sorting science or scientism.It's not what I call science.
It's about what Science is.
How, for the life of me, can you not see/understand/grasp that, huh?
Nah he's not a troll, he does tend to act trollish at times but he means no harm. Or he's an uber troll that has mastered the art who knows.A valiant goal, you just need to work on your identification skill, especially as many people here regard Ponderer as one of the chief offenders in that regard.
That's not an Ad Hominem.More Ad hominem
Says the zealot that is blinded by a belief.By speaking like that you are going to get yourself banned its in the rules plus shows that you are so blinded by your beliefs that you are willing to go to those extremes.
Can you be more specific?Ok is Hydrological sorting science or scientism.
SureThat's not an Ad Hominem.
Make an effort to educate yourself on what it is.
SureSays the zealot that is blinded by a belief.
Heavy fossils are found deeper then lighter fossils.Can you be more specific?
You perhaps referring to the phenomena where more dense particles will naturally tend to aggregate below less dense particles of/in a slurry of particles because of gravity?
Fossils are for a fact found in any layer not light to the top and heavy to the bottom. Please just find out something factual.More dense particles will aggregate below less dense particles of/in a slurry of particles because of gravity.
'Tis been Scientifically proven - it is Science.
You are not making any sense.Fossils are for a fact found in any layer not light to the top and heavy to the bottom. Please just find out something factual.
I will not be rejecting anything you say is scientism or science from this point on because your reasoning is flawed and not fact based.
Actually, Ponderer has given up on rational debate. His only intention is to troll the atheists. Along with a number of personal insults thrown in.Nah he's not a troll, he does tend to act trollish at times but he means no harm. Or he's an uber troll that has mastered the art who knows.
Trolls in general though do it specifically to upset people, they draw joy from it..... not a kind of behaviour that is ever acceptable.