NarrowBandFtw
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 27,726
Why trust what a media outlet with a known bias says?No, but why trust what she says?
Why trust what a media outlet with a known bias says?No, but why trust what she says?
That's actually easier to explain if the meetings with the Russians came up empty and the 33k deleted emails ploy was Plan B.
Why trust what anyone says?No, but why trust what she says?
The deleted emails was common knowledge long before Trump started making noise about it. Why would he need to learn about it from the Russians?..............WHAT?
That's actually easier to explain if the meetings with the Russians came up empty and the 33k deleted emails ploy was Plan B.
Would trust them more than someone who is actually involved. Let me ask the Zuma's about their and the SA governments relationship with the Gupta's. What do you think they will say?Why trust what a media outlet with a known bias says?
The deleted emails was common knowledge long before Trump started making noise about it. Why would he need to learn about it from the Russians?
So in this fantasy scenario of yours, it's MORE realistic to think that Trump Jr and Sr met up with this Russian lady, thinking they were going to score some good dirt.... then when it all turned out to be bogus they were like ah screw it, at least we have the emails. Fire at will! That's so ridiculous I don't even know where to start.
It's less ridiculous than asserting that Trump had to get this info surreptitiously from the Russians when the fact that Hillary deleted these emails was already in the public domain.So in this fantasy scenario of yours, it's MORE realistic to think that Trump Jr and Sr met up with this Russian lady, thinking they were going to score some good dirt.... then when it all turned out to be bogus they were like ah screw it, at least we have the emails. Fire at will! That's so ridiculous I don't even know where to start.
So if you were running for president and someone approached you with info on your opponent, you'd go public with the claims within 10 minutes of receiving the package without anybody taking the time to vet the contents?Or like most accused, he's admitting what he know can be proven and denying what he's almost sure can't be proved.
It's less ridiculous than asserting that Trump had to get this info surreptitiously from the Russians when the fact that Hillary deleted these emails was already in the public domain.
I mean really, what kind of a conspiracy story is that?
If you're a motormouth Trump, yes. Shooting off at the mouth is geneticSo if you were running for president and someone approached you with info on your opponent, you'd go public with the claims within 10 minutes of receiving the package without anybody taking the time to vet the contents?![]()
So you're a Trumpet now? :erm:The kind where you meet up with Russian lawyers connected to the government in the hopes of getting dirt on your opponent, then immediately after start spouting about their deleted emails. Sounds like enough material there to make a juicy conspiracy theory, if all the good theorists hadn't become trumpets.
So you're a Trumpet now? :erm:
And again, if you think people release "dirt" of that sort without vetting the veracity of the allegations during an election campaign, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
I posted a nice link going into depth about how Bannon had affected the Trump campaign yesterday. You ought to read it.If you're a motormouth Trump, yes. Shooting off at the mouth is genetic
:crylaugh:Oh yeah I forgot what a scrupulous and thorough truth-vetter Trump is renowned to be.
Notice to know. What's that got to do with his genetic condition?I posted a nice link going into depth about how Bannon had affected the Trump campaign yesterday. You ought to read it.
I hereby accuse you, Hamish McPanji, with antisemitism. Any and all objections from you will be denied because you cannot be trusted to deny this accusation.Would trust them more than someone who is actually involved. Let me ask the Zuma's about their and the SA governments relationship with the Gupta's. What do you think they will say?
Shame man, don't trigger the thought-police snowflakes.[video=youtube;qNMAp8kXWrc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNMAp8kXWrc[/video]
This is a wonderful example of irony![]()