Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part II Covfefe

Status
Not open for further replies.
OrbitalDawn

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
konfab said:
You can make as many memes as you want to of Fox being beaten up by James Comey. Pretty sure Fox won't send their investigative unit to dox you for doing it either.
Click to expand...

Like when Lou Dobbs from Fox News doxxed a woman? :rolleyes:

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/lou-dobbs-trump-accuser-twitter-2016-10?r=US&IR=T

Oh, and CNN didn't dox the bigot.
 
Hamish McPanji

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,088
konfab said:
You can make as many memes as you want to of Fox being beaten up by James Comey. Pretty sure Fox won't send their investigative unit to dox you for doing it either.
Click to expand...
They have an investigative unit? That's fake news!
 
Unhappy438

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
konfab said:
You can make as many memes as you want to of Fox being beaten up by James Comey. Pretty sure Fox won't send their investigative unit to dox you for doing it either.
Click to expand...

Selective outrage it is then, thanks.
 
Gnarls

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,909
NarrowBandFtw said:
It sure has hell does not prove it is true.

Proof works the other way around ... innocent until proven guilty remember? Unsubstantiated "evidence" is simply false evidence.
Click to expand...

But, but, correlation always implies causation!
 
Unhappy438

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
Collusion, yes; subversion, unclear

That June 2016 meeting will now be investigated, as it should be, thoroughly. Investigators should be expected to question all involved and obtain documentary evidence for any hint that the Trump campaign encouraged or knew of crimes the Russians may have committed related to the election, specifically the crime of hacking Democrats' emails and possibly the emails of various state election officials.

Having said all that, there appears to be no evidence of an actual crime in what we know. It would be a mistake to look at the current evidence of unethical behavior through impeachment-colored glasses.

There is, however, finally evidence of collusion, or a willingness to collude, with Russia. Even if no actual work was done, high-level Trump campaign aides were willing to work with someone identified to them as operating on the Russian government's behalf.
Click to expand...

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/collusion-yes-subversion-unclear/article/2628365
 
#name?

#name?

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
336
Yho is this the most dramatic first year of a presidency or what?
 
B

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
NarrowBandFtw said:
You don't have to believe him, just prove him to be lying in this instance instead of flinging more mud at the wall hoping something sticks.


Putin has a 90%+ approval rating in Russia, do you have any idea how many millions of fridges have his picture on them? I'm a huge fan of Margot Robbie's body and have her pics all over my faproom wall, can I now claim to be connected to her? :D
Click to expand...
I know the picture of putin does not prove anything, it was more of an observation.

The fact that he only released this now and demonstrates clear motive to obtain information from the Russian government is clear.

Unless something is unearthed somewhere the only proof sits with Manafort, Kushner, Trump Jr and this lawyer. All of whom have every motivation in the world to make sure that evidence never ever surfaces.

So really maybe nothing can be proven, but the very act that there is undeniable intent to meet with an agent of a foreign government does begin to raise very pertinent questions.

Especially since this same government's name has come up time and time again, leading to the dismissal of various people close to the Trump campaign and leadership.

Strange how now pro-Trump supporter is willing to address or explain how absolutely convinient this all is. How the whole Trump campaign vehemently denied any meeting what so ever, then shifting the goal post slightly, until the game was up and the lie was fully exposed.

So now the convinient position is well you can't prove that Trump Jr is lying about the meeting being a fruitless exercise, so obviously its all false and there is nothing wrong here. That like looking for a hitman, knowing its hitman, knowing that you want him to kill Bob, but when the police arrive, using the defense well yeah no he didnt kill anyone so meh.

A glaring irony is for a campaign that was run as ultra patriotic to be so willing to garner assistance from a foreign government is laughable.

So yes let us naively belive there is nothing more to this.
 
NarrowBandFtw

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
buka001 said:
So yes let us naively belive there is nothing more to this.
Click to expand...
I've honestly not observed a single person here believing there is nothing more to this, although there's a fair number pointing out there is no evidence yet substantiating this. That is a significant departure from just crucifying someone on a hunch.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top