Unhappy438
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 24,916
No, right-wing policies leads to jobs.
Taking the covfefe to the next level i see.
No, right-wing policies leads to jobs.
Can you tell the differnece between Trump and the Republicans and Zuma and the ANC? .
lol!
Like the catastrophic failure in Kansas, which was, in the Republican Governor's own words: A "real life experiment in trickle down economics"?
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/...ting-failed-on-its-own-terms-2017-6?r=US&IR=T
Or the 2008 financial crisis of course... Lots of jobs lost there.
How does perpetually adding more debt until the interest burden bankrupts the country lead to stable employment?Taking the covfefe to the next level i see.
Don't forget the bailout which cost trillions, with government directly picking winners.The 2008 financial crisis was triggered by government meddling in the housing market.
Or how deregulation (barriers to entry) in the market leads to less employers.How does perpetually adding more debt until the interest burden bankrupts the country lead to stable employment?
How does perpetually adding more debt until the interest burden bankrupts the country lead to stable employment?
The right-wing approach of austerity is the alternative, and while it doesn't promote job growth directly, it does lead to a more robust economy over the long term. Debt overhead is ruinous.Did i say that?
The right-wing approach of austerity is the alternative, and while it doesn't promote job growth directly, it does lead to a more robust economy over the long term. Debt overhead is ruinous.
Good policies promote job growth, they don't have to be intrinsically left or right wing, different situations call for different means. Dismissing good policies and ideas for partisan reasons is the problem.
I fully agree. The problem is partisan politics always plays into account. You take tax for example:
If you made this proposal:
We will close all the tax loopholes in exchange for a lower tax rate across the board.
This does things that both sides of the isle both want, and would be fiscally beneficial well. The problem is that the moment you do this, you will have each party break its promise. You will see higher taxes being slipped in on the left and loopholes introduced by the right.
The sad part is it doesn't pay to be truthful. If you are, you get thrown to the floor quicker than an intern in a Clinton administration.Exactly, unfortunately very few are true to their words in politics.
I concur. This whole thing started cuz OD was playing partisan with his blame, and I merely wanted to set the record straight.Good policies promote job growth, they don't have to be intrinsically left or right wing, different situations call for different means.
Agreed, but we need new ideas cuz none of the old ones work anymore.Dismissing good policies and ideas for partisan reasons is the problem.
Game theory works. It's the only way anything works. The best way I know that we can represent game theory without violence or shame is through capitalism. Capitalism works. Sometimes you have to break up monopolies once game theory stops.Agreed, but we need new ideas cuz none of the old ones work anymore.
Except you win that game with machines instead of playing with other people. When you tell people they can't play, they tend to come to the conclusion that they're better off making their own game.Game theory works. It's the only way anything works. The best way I know that we can represent game theory without violence or shame is through capitalism. Capitalism works. Sometimes you have to break up monopolies once game theory stops.
Again, break up the banks into a million pieces. The stock market is fine and essential for pensions - you just need to decapitate most of the S&P 500.Except you win that game with machines instead of playing with other people. When you tell people they can't play, they tend to come to the conclusion that they're better off making their own game.
Doesn't change the fact that there's going to be a massive decrease in the number of overall jobs available. You can't save for a pension if you can't get a job.Again, break up the banks into a million pieces. The stock market is fine and essential for pensions - you just need to decapitate most of the S&P 500.
Nor will he, imo. He's far more likely to leverage the anti-trust to put America first.If anything, for me personally, the biggest issue I have so far with Trump is that he hasn't done anything of note on anti-trust yet.