Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part II Covfefe

Status
Not open for further replies.
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
rietrot said:
That's left leaning. Geez when you are so far left that classical liberals appear far right.
Click to expand...

This kinda clarifies your position too, I guess.

right02.png


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
rietrot said:
Conservative is centre saying they lean conservative and then putting them at the extreme right with the nazis just make this site completely discredited.
Click to expand...

Convenient. Don't like it so claim it's fake.

I, for one, did not see that coming.
 
AlmightyBender

AlmightyBender

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
7,249
Lag if you guys could peek your head out of your eco chambers for a minute you would discover that YouTube's new ad policies affected almost all types of content negatively.

Examples:
I love Star Wars content, guys I followed all complained that they got demonetized whenever they mentioned things like Death Trooper.

Woodworking channels I watched got demonetized for mentioning to much the brands they were reviewing.

It would be irrational to conclude that Google is anti-star Wars and anti woodworking based on these outcomes

In terms of politics if your views are essentially hate speech (from left or right) then no surprise it gets demonetized. If you not happy with that then you are welcome to take your content elsewhere. Google can set whatever policies they like.
 
Gingerbeardman

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
AlmightyBender said:
Lag if you guys could peek your head out of your eco chambers for a minute you would discover that YouTube's new ad policies affected almost all types of content negatively.
Click to expand...
Funny how lefties only want to talk about the demonitisation and not any other aspect of what's going on at Youtube. Must be one of those eco chamber things.
 
cerebus

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Gingerbeardman said:
I guess you must be ignoring my other response to you, then.
Click to expand...

It's just a bunch of supposition. If a channel violates YT's content guidelines they are well within their rights to remove it, and unfortunately a number of the right wing channels are loonies like Alex Jones. Otherwise I've seen no evidence that the moderators have anything close to an anti-right bias and the links posted by OD suggest the opposite.
 
Gingerbeardman

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
cerebus said:
It's just a bunch of supposition.
Click to expand...
No, actually what I referenced is well documented.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/02/27/google-youtube-southern-poverty-law-center-censorship/

Just one example.

If a channel violates YT's content guidelines they are well within their rights to remove it, and unfortunately a number of the right wing channels are loonies like Alex Jones. Otherwise I've seen no evidence that the moderators have anything close to an anti-right bias and the links posted by OD suggest the opposite.
Click to expand...
Lol. No they don't.
 
Hamish McPanji

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,089
Gingerbeardman said:
No, actually what I referenced is well documented.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/02/27/google-youtube-southern-poverty-law-center-censorship/

Just one example.
.
Click to expand...

Example of what exactly?

"Videos flagged by trusted flaggers are reviewed by YouTube content moderators according to YouTube’s Community Guidelines. Content flagged by trusted flaggers is not automatically removed or subject to any differential policies than content flagged from other users"
Click to expand...

It's flag for review. And an any case there is no evidence of SPLC being or a list of authorised flaggers listed there.

Just supposition, as per the post you responded to
 
Gingerbeardman

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
AlmightyBender

AlmightyBender

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
7,249
Gingerbeardman said:
See my previous post to Cerebus then.
Click to expand...

I read it twice. Can't find any actual examples of content on YouTube that SPLC were responsible for flagging for removal.

As far as I can tell the article is only saying that they are a trusted flagger, but nothing about what that actually resulted in one way or the other.

So what is the problem?
 
Gingerbeardman

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
AlmightyBender said:
I read it twice. Can't find any actual examples of content on YouTube that SPLC were responsible for flagging for removal.
Click to expand...
I don't need to find actual examples to prove that Youtube's content policy collaborates with hopelessly biased organisations to police their platform, and frankly that standard you propose ludicrous because the only way to prove a leftist bias along those lines would be for Youtube to come out and say "we're flagging this video because we don't like conservatives".

As far as I can tell the article is only saying that they are a trusted flagger, but nothing about what that actually resulted in one way or the other.

So what is the problem?
Click to expand...
You mean besides the fact that the SPLC is hopelessly hyperpartisan? :ROFL:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top