Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part II Covfefe

[Gingerbeardman]

Rewriting history and the Southern Strategy? Is that You Dinesh?

Haha, nice try, but no. Guess again?

 

[greg0205]

Haha, nice try, but no. Guess again?

Wait, what? There's more than one wingnut being dunked on for pushing this fiction, in spite of it happening within living memory and being analysed to the atomic level by legitimate historians?

 

[Techne]

Wait, what? There's more than one wingnut being dunked on for pushing this fiction, in spite of it happening within living memory and being analysed to the atomic level by legitimate historians?

What are those? The ones pushing the white grievance/hate narrative?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Wait, what? There's more than one wingnut being dunked on for pushing this fiction, in spite of it happening within living memory and being analysed to the atomic level by legitimate historians?

Ah, I see you're going to continue to misconstrue what the cartoon asserts. Ah well, if that's how you want to play it...

How's this?

 

[greg0205]

What are those? The ones pushing the white grievance/hate narrative?

TFW professionals studying an era in the States, then writing about it objectively and dispassionately... with references, eye-witness accounts and more... becomes pushing the white grievance/hate narrative.

 

[Techne]

TFW professionals studying an era in the States, then writing about it objectively and dispassionately... with references, eye-witness accounts and more... becomes pushing the white grievance/hate narrative.

How innocent you are lol!

 

[greg0205]

Ah, I see you're going to continue to misconstrue what the cartoon asserts. Ah well, if that's how you want to play it...

How's this?

It's almost a D'Souza level troll of something that started circa '64 and ended in the early 70s with Republicans being the de-facto party of white racial grievance.

Well done.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

It's almost a D'Souza level troll of something that started circa '64 and ended in the early 70s with Republicans being the de-facto party of white racial grievance.

Well done.

So if what you're talking about started in 1964, and yet Malcom X was already chastising black people for their slavish obedience to Democrats in 1964, then...

 

[greg0205]

So if what you're talking about started in 1964, and yet Malcom X was already chastising black people for their slavish obedience to Democrats in 1964, then...

As he should in '64. He'd be 94 if he were alive today and I'll guarantee you he'd be voting and canvassing Blue if he could.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

As he should in '64. He'd be 94 if he were alive today and I'll guarantee you he'd be voting and canvassing Blue if he could.

Nice bait and switch with the goalposts there.

Let's try this again.

If black voters were already voting for Democrats as a matter of unthinking habit back in 1964, then how can Republican behaviour after 1964 be to blame for the behaviour pattern of black voters that existed before 1964?

 

[Techne]

As he should in '64. He'd be 94 if he were alive today and I'll guarantee you he'd be voting and canvassing Blue if he could.

Why? Because you think he hates white people like you and the Democrats?

 

[greg0205]

Why? Because you think he hates white people like you?

A history with Islam and who likes to ban Muslim folk? A history with civil rights and Tim Scott in the Senate... Just Tim Scott. A history of criticising capitalism and who is freaking out over AOC?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

TFW professionals studying an era in the States, then writing about it objectively and dispassionately... with references, eye-witness accounts and more... becomes pushing the white grievance/hate narrative.

Objectivity is a tool of the heteronormative patriarchy. Check your privilege.

 

[Techne]

A history with Islam and who likes to ban Muslim folk? A history with civil rights and Tim Scott in the Senate... Just Tim Scott. A history of criticising capitalism and who is freaking out over AOC?

So, hates white people, just like the democrats. Gotit.

 

[Techne]

Objectivity is a tool of the heteronormative patriarchy. Check your privilege.

I think Greg is gunning for town councillor of the Hetero-Normative Patriarchy Party.

 

[greg0205]

Nice bait and switch with the goalposts there.

Let's try this again.

If black voters were already voting for Democrats as a matter of unthinking habit back in 1964, then how can Republican behaviour after 1964 be to blame for the behaviour pattern of black voters that existed before 1964?

Well, after 65, the Voting Rights act enforced the 15A, so we agree on that.
Before '65, I'm betting we're one post away from you saying it was because FDR and JFK offered them "free stuff". Amirite?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Well, after 65, the Voting Rights act enforced the 15A, so we agree on that.

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

Before '65, I'm betting we're one post away from you saying it was because FDR and JFK offered them "free stuff". Amirite?

Playing to lose, I'm afraid. Like I said, you misconstrued the cartoon.

 

[greg0205]

@Emjay A while ago you asked, "which Dems?"

Start here.

 

[Techne]

@Emjay A while ago you asked, "which Dems?"

Start here.

This is awesome news!
I wonder what her campaign message will be
Make California Mexico Again then Make America like California.
Or perhaps
If you are not a minority then FU.

 

[greg0205]

This is awesome news!
I wonder what her campaign message will be
Make California Mexico Again then Make America like California.
Or perhaps
If you are not a minority then FU.

Good thing you watched the clip 'tho.