Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

[Hamish McPanji]

.
She's got them crazy eyes!!!

^^^ Fixed, for added effect

 

[greg0205]

Just becaues you think she's hot doesn't mean she's not crazy.
She has those crazy eyes.

My Spidey senses are tingling. A "smirk" derail might be imminent.

Eniigma, that tiny, Latina freshman congresswoman from NY is living proof that "F**k Your Feelings" tee-shirt wearin', red hat totin', Acosta bashin', Lock Her Upin', Build That Wallin' "economically anxious" folk understand neither the term "snowflake", nor the concept of irony.

 

[Emjay]

My Spidey senses are tingling. A "smirk" derail might be imminent.

Eniigma, that tiny, Latina freshman congresswoman from NY is living proof that "F**k Your Feelings" tee-shirt wearin', red hat totin', Acosta bashin', Lock Her Upin', Build That Wallin' "economically anxious" folk understand neither the term "snowflake", nor the concept of irony.

It's very clear that she is a little Trump, but only the other side of the economic discussion. The irony has been picked up a while ago already. Her comments are less driven from her ego, and more from her complete and total ignorance though. At this point she has a cult following, which is interesting to watch.

Lets talk about Howard Schultz though. He would be insane to run as a Democrat. I really, really, really hope he runs as an independent. That would be just great (said in a Trump voice).

 

[greg0205]

It's very clear that she is a little Trump, but only the other side of the economic discussion. The irony has been picked up a while ago already. Her comments are less driven from her ego, and more from her complete and total ignorance though. At this point she has a cult following, which is interesting to watch.

Lets talk about Howard Schultz though. He would be insane to run as a Democrat. I really, really, really hope he runs as an independent. That would be just great (said in a Trump voice).

We’re never going to agree on AOC Emjay, but that’s okay... it’s because of our differences that you and I keep coming back for more.

EDIT: Oh, you, with your post-post edits. Schultz? Sure. I’m reading that his advisors are telling him his only path is to actively attack Dems. That’s always a winning strategy to attract leftist votes.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

No, the majority fly in.

The majority do not have the money or the documentation to fly in. Easier and cheaper to walk.

 

[C4Cat]

Just becaues you think she's hot doesn't mean she's not crazy.
She has those crazy eyes.

She's the only one saying what needs to be said and is not cowered by the old boys club. She also seems to be one of the few who actually understands what needs to be done to save the US.

 

[Unhappy438]

The majority do not have the money or the documentation to fly in. Easier and cheaper to walk.

According to your feels maybe. Facts say otherwise however.

 

[cerebus]

The majority do not have the money or the documentation to fly in. Easier and cheaper to walk.

You think it's easier to walk through the desert, swim the Rio Grande, etc than to fly in on a tourist visa? You've been smocking some good rocks.

 

[Eniigma]

She's the only one saying what needs to be said and is not cowered by the old boys club. She also seems to be one of the few who actually understands what needs to be done to save the US.

Please tell me you are not being serious?

If you are I think there is no hope for us to ever agree on this, I simply cannot fathom how you can arrive at that reasoning. We'll never be on the same page, heck we're not even reading from the same book in that case.

I'm not going to go into the reasoning behind it. There is enough evidence out there for me to be happy with my conclusions around her. If they evidence shows you something else, so be it.

But please I beg of you, for the love of all that is holy tell me that you’re pulling my leg with that statement?

 

[greg0205]

Please tell me you are not being serious?

If you are I think there is no hope for us to ever agree on this, I simply cannot fathom how you can arrive at that reasoning. We'll never be on the same page, heck we're not even reading from the same book in that case.

I'm not going to go into the reasoning behind it. There is enough evidence out there for me to be happy with my conclusions around her. If they evidence shows you something else, so be it.

But please I beg of you, for the love of all that is holy tell me that you’re pulling my leg with that statement?

 

[Emjay]

EDIT: Oh, you, with your post-post edits. Schultz? Sure. I’m reading that his advisors are telling him his only path is to actively attack Dems. That’s always a winning strategy to attract leftist votes.

Come now, Greg. You should be reading more into this than you are. I have full faith in you. He is not attacking the Dems, they are attacking him for his wealth. You must have noticed that Democrats are more interested in moderate candidates, so that means a lot of people will be on board with Schultz. The problem is that the DNC cannot be trusted (and rightly so), so he shouldn't run within the Democratic party. If he runs as an independent, Trump will probably win. Trump is supremely unpopular with the suburban voters. Especially suburban women. Schultz will draw these votes away from the Democrats, and not other voters from Trump at this stage.

Listening to him, I would actually vote for him over Trump. This is why the Democrats are gunning for him.

And now Crazy Eyes Booker has thrown his hat in the ring. One has to ask, who from the Democrats is NOT running?

 

[Emjay]

Please tell me you are not being serious?

If you are I think there is no hope for us to ever agree on this, I simply cannot fathom how you can arrive at that reasoning. We'll never be on the same page, heck we're not even reading from the same book in that case.

I'm not going to go into the reasoning behind it. There is enough evidence out there for me to be happy with my conclusions around her. If they evidence shows you something else, so be it.

But please I beg of you, for the love of all that is holy tell me that you’re pulling my leg with that statement?

Welcome to MyBB.

 

[Eniigma]

Welcome to MyBB.

Yip, now you know why I only having just over a thousand posts despite being here since 2006.

They say a picture is worth a thousand words and well gregs response actaully perfectly sums up the EQ and IQ levels of most of these lefties/ liberals/ whatever the correct non-derogatory term for them is this month. No point discussing with someone when that's the level of response.

 

[Emjay]

Yip, now you know why I only have a few hundred posts despite being here since 2006.

They say a picture is worth a thousand words and well gregs response actaully perfectly sums up the EQ and IQ levels of most of these lefties/ liberals/ whatever the correct non-derogatory term for them is this month. No point discussing with someone when that's the level of response.

Some people really believe that an upheaval of the entire US economy is required to stop the world from ending in 12 years. Fighting against that ideology is a battle for another day.

 

[C4Cat]

Please tell me you are not being serious?

If you are I think there is no hope for us to ever agree on this, I simply cannot fathom how you can arrive at that reasoning. We'll never be on the same page, heck we're not even reading from the same book in that case.

I'm not going to go into the reasoning behind it. There is enough evidence out there for me to be happy with my conclusions around her. If they evidence shows you something else, so be it.

But please I beg of you, for the love of all that is holy tell me that you’re pulling my leg with that statement?

I'm big serious, yes. And you can be as condescending as you like to people that disagree with you, you're no authority on anything. I'm confident enough in my education and experience to know my opinions, which I do actually think through, are as valid as yours or Emjays.

 

[Emjay]

I'm big serious, yes. And you can be as condescending as you like to people that disagree with you, you're no authority on anything. I'm confident enough in my education and experience to know my opinions, which I do actually think through, are as valid as yours or Emjays.

Please explain how a Green New Deal is what America needs when there are ZERO details around it's implementation, or how it is funded?

 

[greg0205]

Come now, Greg. You should be reading more into this than you are. I have full faith in you. He is not attacking the Dems, they are attacking him for his wealth. You must have noticed that Democrats are more interested in moderate candidates, so that means a lot of people will be on board with Schultz. The problem is that the DNC cannot be trusted (and rightly so), so he shouldn't run within the Democratic party. If he runs as an independent, Trump will probably win. Trump is supremely unpopular with the suburban voters. Especially suburban women. He will draw away votes those from Democrats, and not Trump at this stage.

Listening to him, I would actually vote for him over Trump. This is why the Democrats are gunning for him.

And now Crazy Eyes Booker has thrown his hat in the ring. One has to ask, who from the Democrats is NOT running?

Em, you've been so busy thumbing your Rosary Beads, praying for red waves and the Mueller investigation to end that you haven't noticed that every single Dem candidate is left, way left of centre... That it's just where the base want 'em to be... That the devil-socialist Obama healthcare was the the number one issue in the midterms... That a majority of folk *want* to tax the super rich.

I'm going to point you back to my post #185 to let David Rothkopf tell you why Dems reject Schultz. He's beautifully eloquent and you'll be spared the snark I'll inevitably inject into the post. Spoiler Alert: It's not just his money.

Finally, can I just thank you for saying, out loud, exactly what I think Schultz does every time he opens his mouth... He's positions himself more and more as an unintended, independent, primary challenger to Donnie.
Sure, Dems are gun-shy 'cos Jill Stein, but they'll come around to entitled-self-obsessed-rich-white-guy-actually-poses-a-bigger-threat-to-other-entitled-self-obsessed-rich-white-guy soon enough. You did.

 

[Unhappy438]

Please explain how a Green New Deal is what America needs when there are ZERO details around it's implementation, or how it is funded?

Lol so now you are agreeing with me when i said we cant say if its good or bad until we have details?

 

[C4Cat]

Please explain how a Green New Deal is what America needs when there are ZERO details around it's implementation, or how it is funded?

We know America (actually the world) needs economic stimulus programs that address both economic inequality and climate change. It's actually a no-brainer. Once that is accepted as given, the various proposals can be considered and implementation and funding can be worked out. Just because the details of how to achieve something are not clear doesn't mean we should not start on the path towards achieving a result. We know things like addressing climate change and prioritizing renewable energy must be included in any future infrastructure package, for example.

 

[greg0205]

Red hat folk. Question for y'all... If it's just a hat, why does the MAGA gun girl from Kent State say, "Went through TSA with my #MAGA hat on to remind everyone that their jobs are disposable and they're non-essential"? If she thinks it sends a clear message, how come y'all don't?

Kaitlin Bennett
Follow @KaitMarieox

Went through TSA with my #MAGA hat on to remind everyone that their jobs are disposable and they're non-essential. Their paychecks come from someone else's paychecks. What a world we live in where we accept that. #AbolishTheTSA #TaxationIsTheft

3:12 AM - 31 Jan 2019

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090779707422007297