Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

[cerebus]

Check out what @Google is up to for the 2020 election!

Kevin Cernekee, the new James Damore only somehow more vile and racist.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/05/...servs-richard-spencer-golden-state-skinheads/

BTW, there is a bounty to track down Dr. Spencer’s assailant:
https://www.wesearchr.com/bounties/exposetheantifawhosuckerpunchedrichardspencer
Should we put together a group donation in the name of “freespeech@Google”? It would be a nice gesture.

 

[Unhappy438]

I was being more than reasonable, seeing that the full list of 200 something always gets used to make a point about how bad mass shootings in the US is. It's dishonest to now go and want to change the criteria.

However if you can find a credible list, unlike the nonsense cerebus posted last night, that would be interesting to see who are the actual terrorist.

So are we talking about mass shootings or terrorism? Seems like its terrorism and your everyday criminals are not terrorists no matter what linguistic twisting you try and do.

 

[jack_spratt]

Kevin Cernekee, the new James Damore only somehow more vile and racist.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/05/...servs-richard-spencer-golden-state-skinheads/

Oh, and how is he a racist?

 

[cerebus]

Oh, and how is he a racist?

You read the article?

 

[jack_spratt]

You read the article?

Yes. He wants to find someone who sucker punched someone? Both are white...?

 

[cerebus]

Yes. He wants to find someone who sucker punched someone? Both are white...?

"Someone"

 

[rietrot]

So are we talking about mass shootings or terrorism? Seems like its terrorism and your everyday criminals are not terrorists no matter what linguistic twisting you try and do.

Just put up your list, whichever list you like.

Mass shooting are pointed to as the problem, it isn't my linguistic twisting.

Eiter, or, is fine me. Whatever point you would like to make. Just do it.

 

[Unhappy438]

Just put up your list, whichever list you like.

Mass shooting are pointed to as the problem, it isn't my linguistic twisting.

Eiter, or, is fine me. Whatever point you would like to make. Just do it.

If its mass shootings and not terrorism you are talking with then i have no problem with your list.

 

[jack_spratt]

"Someone"

Yes. Stop bleating about racism when there isnt any.

 

[cerebus]

Yes. Stop bleating about racism when there isnt any.

Richard Spencer is the leader of the alt-right. He's literally a neo-nazi. And Cernekee has a history of supporting him and the Golden State Skinheads.

Mike Wacker, another conservative Googler, wrote a good blog about Cernekee and previously called him 'the face of the alt-right'. He dismantles Cernekee's entire persona and disowns him.

At the outset, I said I would withdraw my claim that Kevin was “the face of the alt-right,” as I wanted readers to make their own judgment. At this point, though, I’m not too worried about assigning a label to Kevin, and I trust that the readers could come up with an accurate label in my absence.
I do have one question for Kevin, though: if he thinks that the label I previously used was unfair, then what label would he use instead? I will give him a wide degree of latitude in answering that, but there is one label in particular that I will not let Kevin use to describe himself: conservative.
Whatever Kevin is, he’s clearly not a conservative.

Cernekee is a scumbag.

 

[jack_spratt]

Richard Spencer is the leader of the alt-right. He's literally a neo-nazi. And Cernekee has a history of supporting him and the Golden State Skinheads.

Mike Wacker, another conservative Googler, wrote a good blog about Cernekee and previously called him 'the face of the alt-right'. He dismantles Cernekee's entire persona and disowns him.



Cernekee is a scumbag.

A person is a scumbag if said person contradicts your ideology.

 

[Gnarls]

Kevin Cernekee, the new James Damore only somehow more vile and racist.

Please explain why James Damore is both racist and vile?

A person is a scumbag if said person contradicts your ideology.

This is known.

 

[cerebus]

A person is a scumbag if said person contradicts your ideology.

I'm obviously not going to convince people who will deny that someone is racist unless they carve a swastika onto their foreheads. But in the real world where most of us live he obviously is.

 

[cerebus]

Please explain why James Damore is both racist and vile?

I don't owe you ****

 

[Gnarls]

I don't owe you ****

So you don't know ****. As expected.

 

[RyanPCMR]

Just a quick question to people posting negative stuff in this thread, what do you get out of this?

Is it empowering, etc.?

 

[STS]

I'm obviously not going to convince people who will deny that someone is racist unless they carve a swastika onto their foreheads. But in the real world where most of us live he obviously is.

Even then, just because someone has a swastika carved into their forehead, it doesn't mean they're actually racist, you're judging the person based on his appearance, he is being ironic and trying to troll the left

 

[Grant]

/raises hand

Pretty well established pattern by now. The right never have any agency or responsibility. Anything they do is only in response so some other slight from "the left".
.
.
.
But no, I don't think you're even looking at what "the left" (whoever that's even supposed to be) is saying or doing.

was that a flip-flop i just saw ?

 

[Temujin]

 

[cerebus]

I mean, they kind of have a point:

https://www.texastribune.org/2019/0...-participates-el-paso-shooting-investigation/

Mexican officials say El Paso massacre was terrorism aimed at their citizens — and vow to be part of investigation
The shooting, which killed 22 people, has reignited Mexican officials' criticism of what they consider lax U.S. gun laws.