Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

[Gnarls]

Have you explained any of the topics you've been trolled on?

Oh, but of course, there's no way the trolling could actually be landing a valid criticism, could it?

Case in point: You've got no indication that there is anything about James Damore that is "vile" unless you're applying a cultural Marxist worldview, and you know it.

Which neatly encapsulates cerebus' trolling, gaslighting and strawmanning.

Here is a troll post for you @cerebus

 

[STS]

You aren't conservative. But you say you are right wing. Ergo, you are also a Nazi. Where is the confusion?

By the very reasoning you have endorsed, you have proved that you are a Nazi. And thereby I have shown that your standards are so absurd that I need not concern myself with your baseless accusations about my political point of view.

P.S. I don't want you to be nice to me, I much prefer the antagonism.

I am a Nazi AND a cultural Marxist?!? Jesus, I must be making your nuts and bolts spin! Even you are confused by your narrative now.

So am I the left or the right now in your eyes? And how does this affect all the bs you're spewing, your illuminati conspiracy and tje shooters manifesto?

If you can't even tell which side I am on, you're not really in a position to comment on a manifesto, are you?

 

[Gingerbeardman]

I am a Nazi AND a cultural Marxist?!? Jesus, I must be making your nuts and bolts spin! Even you are confused by your narrative now.

Yes, I don't think you are actually a Nazi. I think your claim that you are right-wing is inaccurate. You clearly demonstrate all the leftie control tendencies, so I don't have difficulty validating your authoritarian tendencies. You don't display any right wing sensitivities on a variety of topics.

I don't have any problem, however, taking your reasoning and entertaining it and its logical consequences for the purposes of making a point.

So am I the left or the right now in your eyes? And how does this affect all the bs you're spewing, your illuminati conspiracy and tje shooters manifesto?

If you can't even tell which side I am on, you're not really in a position to comment on a manifesto, are you?

"Jokes aside" means what?

 

[Pitbull]

Yes, I don't think you are actually a Nazi. I think your claim that you are right-wing is inaccurate. You clearly demonstrate all the leftie control tendencies, so I don't have difficulty validating your authoritarian tendencies. You don't display any right wing sensitivities on a variety of topics.

I don't have any problem, however, taking your reasoning and entertaining it and its logical consequences for the purposes of making a point.

"Jokes aside" means what?

Looking at the classification I would say most people on MyBB is mainly central with right leaning tendencies.

Going by that reasoning all the libtards on here are extremely left, no matter what they claim. I have been called 'n racist, nazi damn even a pathetic excuse of a human because I don't agree with some of their views. I'm Right, nothing centre, but a far stretch from extreme right some would belief me to be ...

I'll even go as far as saying you're even more central to right from my view. Only cause you're on my left

 

[Gnarls]

Going by that reasoning all the libtards on here are extremely left, no matter what they claim. I have been called 'n racist, nazi damn even a pathetic excuse of a human because I don't agree with some of their views. I'm Right, nothing centre, but a far stretch from extreme right some would belief me to be ...

Respond in kind though and you'd swear there is a pitchfork and torch clearout sale!

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Looking at the classification I would say most people on MyBB is mainly central with right leaning tendencies.

Going by that reasoning all the libtards on here are extremely left, no matter what they claim. I have been called 'n racist, nazi damn even a pathetic excuse of a human because I don't agree with some of their views. I'm Right, nothing centre, but a far stretch from extreme right some would belief me to be ...

I'll even go as far as saying you're even more central to right from my view. Only cause you're on my left

Like, is it too much to ask for leftism without cultural Marxism? Apparently so.

 

[theratman]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/sports/trump-violent-video-games-studies.html

After two mass shootings over the weekend that killed 31 people and wounded dozens more, powerful Republicans, including the president, blamed an old boogeyman: video games.

“We must stop the glorification of violence in our society,” President Trump said on Monday in a White House address on the shootings. “This includes the gruesome and grisly video games that are now commonplace.”

 

[Gingerbeardman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158584283742605313

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158714506035499008

A tale in two tweets. The tail now wags the dog.

 

[cerebus]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/sports/trump-violent-video-games-studies.html

After two mass shootings over the weekend that killed 31 people and wounded dozens more, powerful Republicans, including the president, blamed an old boogeyman: video games.

“We must stop the glorification of violence in our society,” President Trump said on Monday in a White House address on the shootings. “This includes the gruesome and grisly video games that are now commonplace.”

As soon as they say the words 'video games' you know it means they're not gonna do ****

 

[buka001]

Looking at the classification I would say most people on MyBB is mainly central with right leaning tendencies.

Going by that reasoning all the libtards on here are extremely left, no matter what they claim. I have been called 'n racist, nazi damn even a pathetic excuse of a human because I don't agree with some of their views. I'm Right, nothing centre, but a far stretch from extreme right some would belief me to be ...

I'll even go as far as saying you're even more central to right from my view. Only cause you're on my left

Ok simply said, the people who agree with you are centrist with right leaning tendancies (no name calling used).

Everyone you disagree with (aka libtards - note the name calling) are extreme leftists.

Some of them cannot be centrists with left leaning tendencies, they have to be far left.

Such naked and obvious bias is so often never seen. Thanks for the honesty in showing your bias. Appreciate it, thank you.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

@STS Timestamped for your convenience, although you should watch the whole thing for context.



Own goal, much?

 

[Pitbull]

Ok simply said, the people who agree with you are centrist with right leaning tendancies (no name calling used).

Everyone you disagree with (aka libtards - note the name calling) are extreme leftists.

Some of them cannot be centrists with left leaning tendencies, they have to be far left.

Such naked and obvious bias is so often never seen. Thanks for the honesty in showing your bias. Appreciate it, thank you.

Exactly. I have not seen a SINGLE centre left on here. They do claim to be...

 

[STS]

@STS Timestamped for your convenience, although you should watch the whole thing for context.



Own goal, much?

Put it this way, even if it as posted to Instagram first, the fact that it ended up on 8chan with the wording "spread the message far and wide brothers" should tell you all you need to know about the site.

the fact that two manifestos have made it to 8chan before this one also doesn't really give the site any credibility, on top of people praising the shooter and turning him into a martyr.

On top of that, he references that Christchurch shooter and his manifesto, which appeared on 8chan and said it was his inspiration.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Put it this way, even if it as posted to Instagram first, the fact that it ended up on 8chan with the wording "spread the message far and wide brothers" should tell you all you need to know about the site.

the fact that two manifestos have made it to 8chan before this one also doesn't really give the site any credibility, on top of people praising the shooter and turning him into a martyr.

On top of that, he references that Christchurch shooter and his manifesto, which appeared on 8chan and said it was his inspiration.

Whatever you say, cultural Marxist.

Anyway, so defending free speech is obviously not a right-wing priority, right? Cuz you're right wing, right?

So I can freely claim that championing free speech is left wing and anti-authoritarian, and you won't object, correct?

 

[Gnarls]

Put it this way, even if it as posted to Instagram first, the fact that it ended up on 8chan with the wording "spread the message far and wide brothers" should tell you all you need to know about the site.

the fact that two manifestos have made it to 8chan before this one also doesn't really give the site any credibility, on top of people praising the shooter and turning him into a martyr.

On top of that, he references that Christchurch shooter and his manifesto, which appeared on 8chan and said it was his inspiration.

Correlation != Causation

 

[STS]

Whatever you say, cultural Marxist.

Anyway, so defending free speech is obviously not a right-wing priority, right? Cuz you're right wing, right?

So I can freely claim that championing free speech is left wing and anti-authoritarian, and you won't object, correct?

Free speech isn't hate speech, intimidation or threat to life. It is not the words, it is the intention. A site that not only breeds shooters, but also glorifies them is not healthy. The site can either deal with the hate speech(as the 4chan owner did which caused people to fk off to 8chan) or it can be dealt with as the service providers dealt with 8chan. If free speech is so important to you and your fellow SS comrades, why did the owner take the manifesto down faster than he could **** his pants? not very first amendment-like is it?

Same could be said for you, you're the one crying here every day about cultural Marxism - why aren't you defending the left's free speech? it isn't hurting anyone is it?

 

[STS]

Correlation != Causation

I agree - apply that thinking to cultural Marxism now

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Free speech isn't hate speech, intimidation or threat to life. It is not the words, it is the intention.

This is the left-wing politically correct position, not the right wing position. Your mask is slipping. Hate speech is still free speech, even if you don't like it. Intimidation and incitement to violence actually speaks to action instead of emotion, and that's the crucial distinction.

So I guess that must mean my free speech position is the left wing one? You didn't answer the question.

Same could be said for you, you're the one crying here every day about cultural Marxism - why aren't you defending the left's free speech? it isn't hurting anyone is it?

Yes it is, you're just selectively blind to the consequences. And I don't care to censor it, I just care to call to everyone's attention how crap it is.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

I agree - apply that thinking to cultural Marxism now

Except there is a causal, non-correlative link between cultural Marxism as it is practiced and the terminology invented in critical theory and its related fields, a blatant fact you have failed to acknowledge, the failure in turn serving as evidence of ideological posession.

 

[STS]

This is the left-wing politically correct position, not the right wing position. Your mask is slipping. Hate speech is still free speech, even if you don't like it. Intimidation and incitement to violence actually speaks to action instead of emotion, and that's the crucial distinction.

Bullshit, multiple right-wing forumites also hold this view, it is only the the alt-right who are free of all consequences and want to troll the world that hold the view that anything goes. We had this debate the other day in a racist thread that WORDS cannot hurt you, it is the intention behind the words and what they lead to. Else next time you can go into a Malema racism thread and defend him, see the backlash you get.

So I guess that must mean my free speech position is the left wing one? You didn't answer the question.

Yes it is, you're just selectively blind to the consequences. And I don't care to censor it, I just care to call to everyone's attention how crap it is.

We are stuck between two crazy sides, the one side wants you to call a man a woman when he isn't and the other side wants us to accept a gunman plotting to murder people online on a public forum has his democatic right to free speech.

Again, you are so far right that you're falling off the spectrum