Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

[buka001]

Ah, yes. CountCrypto was banned to ensure that everyone's ideological safe spaces remained in tact.

Yeah sad that. I miss him. Having him expose his sheer hatred and puerile views was useful to an extent. But Nazis have always got to Nazi. At least he was sort of honest in that respect.

I spotted him for who he was from his first post here. As with people on the far fringes of the spectrum it was easy to draw out his views by triggering socio-economic anxieties in some of the posts, to test the water of his views. He did not fail to miss an opportunity to express his deep seated anxiety there at all

Besides his plagiarism of Mein Kampf, my all time favourite is how, due to his cognitive dissonance, he assumed (based on a typical right wing meme) that I was some ultra soyboy, infertile cuck, because I dared to call him out on his extremist views.
He could not have been more wrong lol. Ironically I doubt very much he is married, let alone ever had the chance to father a kid.

 

[STS]

What I do or don't do in no way detracts from your misprepresentation of what your own position is. You're free to continue speaking as much kak as you like, but as per the smiley, don't expect me to pay much attention.

Unless, of course, it triggers my funny bone.

You do nothing for the unwanted kids? Still just a clown on the internet huh?

Anyway, tick tock, day is coming

 

[Gingerbeardman]

You do nothing for the unwanted kids? Still just a clown on the internet huh?

Such a leftie am I, no?

Anyway, tick tock, day is coming

 

[cerebus]

Another one with a very poor memory.

I have a pretty good memory

Still does not change the fact that you were supremely triggered.

Mmhmm...

CountCrypto was banned to ensure that everyone's ideological safe spaces remained in tact.

I more interested in your lack of resilience to bad ideas, than to his banning.

After 10 years on this forum, I think my resilience to bad ideas is just fine.

I still don't get how James Damore is vile and a racist. There have been studies to actually back up what he said, but I am sure you know this already and that I am preaching to choir.

There's this, but I admit it doesn't make much of a case for him being vile and a racist, so I'll step that back. He is a total nincompoop though, and Cernekee is a scumbag.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

There's this, but I admit it doesn't make much of a case for him being vile and a racist, so I'll step that back. He is a total nincompoop though, and Cernekee is a scumbag.

Aw schit, @Gnarls had a point.

After 10 years on this forum, I think my resilience to bad ideas is just fine.

 

[scudsucker]

veridical

Thesaurus.com's word of the day has failed you, Xarog. Or, you failed to read the definition?

I wonder which option is true.

I lean towards the latter, particularly as you are very prone to sesquipedalia.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Thesaurus.com's word of the day has failed you, Xarog. Or, you failed to read the definition? I wonder which option is true.

I lean towards the latter.

Wooosh.

Scudsucker, I do acknowledge, the word is inappropriate given the context, but please do explain in excruciating detail what that error is so that I can cc @Gnarls and we can have a good laugh about your appeal to the overton window.

 

[Gnarls]

Wooosh.

Scudsucker, I do acknowledge, the word is inappropriate given the context, but please do explain in excruciating detail what that error is so that I can cc @Gnarls and we can have a good laugh about your appeal to the overton window.

 

[scudsucker]

You two are so sweet together. It's sad you never got that threesome with the Count.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

You two are so sweet together. It's sad you never got that threesome with the Count.

The Count is no doubt with us in spirit given how critical theory was used so masterfully against you in the ultimate act of subversive reactionaryism.

 

[cerebus]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ternet-facebook-ads-racism-immigrant-invasion

The second version of ad copy reads in part: “We have an INVASION! So we are BUILDING THE WALL to STOP IT. Dems will sue us. But we want a SAFE COUNTRY! It’s CRITICAL that we STOP THE INVASION. Nancy Pelosi and Democrats have not negotiated in good faith to fund a wall at our Southern Border, proving that OBSTRUCTION is far more important to them than YOUR SAFETY. I cannot allow America’s safety and security to be put at risk any longer. We need the wall, and I must put AMERICA FIRST!”



I'm trying to think where I heard that rhetoric used recently...

 

[scudsucker]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ternet-facebook-ads-racism-immigrant-invasion

The second version of ad copy reads in part: “We have an INVASION! So we are BUILDING THE WALL to STOP IT. Dems will sue us. But we want a SAFE COUNTRY! It’s CRITICAL that we STOP THE INVASION. Nancy Pelosi and Democrats have not negotiated in good faith to fund a wall at our Southern Border, proving that OBSTRUCTION is far more important to them than YOUR SAFETY. I cannot allow America’s safety and security to be put at risk any longer. We need the wall, and I must put AMERICA FIRST!”



I'm trying to think where I heard that rhetoric used recently...

The late 1930s is not that recent.

 

[scudsucker]

reactionaryism.

Sorry, Xarog. Can you please use words you actually understand? Start with one syllable words, and build up to two - or even three - syllables as you get more confident. Take it slow. Don't hurt your brain with complicated words yet.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Sorry, Xarog. Can you please use words you actually understand? Start with one syllable words, and build up to two syllables as you get more confident. Take it slow.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/reactionaryism

reactionaryism (uncountable)

1. (politics) The advocacy of reactionary political positions. quotations ▼

Problem? You know, this taking potshots at my vocabulary isn't working out very well for you...

 

[scudsucker]

Problem? You know, this taking potshots at my vocabulary isn't working out very well for you...

Scudsucker, I do acknowledge, the word is inappropriate given the context

Can anyone else see a spot of cognitive dissonance here? Xarog?

 

[cerebus]

https://www.wired.com/story/the-looser-a-states-gun-laws-the-more-mass-shootings-it-has/

Both Texas and Ohio, where the latest terror attacks were carried out, also scored high on gun law permissibility. In both states it’s legal to carry concealed weapons in public, provided the gun owner has the proper permits to own it. In Texas, permits are issued to applicants over the age of 21 who pass a four-to-six-hour training course and don’t have any pending criminal charges. According to Ohio’s gun laws, residents 21 years and older must complete an eight-hour training course, not be addicted to any controlled substances, and be able to pass a criminal background check.
Most relevant to the recent killings in El Paso and Dayton though, is the fact that the semi-automatic weapons used to carry out the attacks can be purchased legally. Only six states and the District of Columbia have enacted bans on these types of military-style firearms. Texas and Ohio are not among them. Both states also allow large-capacity magazines like those the gunmen in both El Paso and Dayton appear to have used to fire dozens of rounds in seconds without having to reload.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Can anyone else see a spot of cognitive dissonance here? Xarog?

The word is inappropriate because one has to understand the inappropriateness in order to get the joke, but the joke itself cannot be made without having the necessary mastery of the language in order to understand where and how to use the word properly, so the only thing that you are in fact demonstrating is that you (a) don't understand the joke, and (b) are perfectly willing to make an utter fool of yourself to the entertainment of everyone who has the fortune to read the stupidity you post.

But of course, this is the point where I usually cut our interactions short, because this is the usual point where your argument becomes an appeal to idiocy and I don't want to catch whathever IQ reducing contagion it is that you're carrying.

 

[Emjay]

 

[Emjay]

https://www.wired.com/story/the-looser-a-states-gun-laws-the-more-mass-shootings-it-has/

Both Texas and Ohio, where the latest terror attacks were carried out, also scored high on gun law permissibility. In both states it’s legal to carry concealed weapons in public, provided the gun owner has the proper permits to own it. In Texas, permits are issued to applicants over the age of 21 who pass a four-to-six-hour training course and don’t have any pending criminal charges. According to Ohio’s gun laws, residents 21 years and older must complete an eight-hour training course, not be addicted to any controlled substances, and be able to pass a criminal background check.
Most relevant to the recent killings in El Paso and Dayton though, is the fact that the semi-automatic weapons used to carry out the attacks can be purchased legally. Only six states and the District of Columbia have enacted bans on these types of military-style firearms. Texas and Ohio are not among them. Both states also allow large-capacity magazines like those the gunmen in both El Paso and Dayton appear to have used to fire dozens of rounds in seconds without having to reload.

Chicago has the strictest gun laws, don't they? Do you know how many people were shot in Chicago over the weekend? 53.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/...-shootings-lawndale-douglas-park-gun-violence

 

[scudsucker]

...the usual nonsense...

Perhaps if you applied yourself to learning the language, rather than relying on thesaurus.com you could actually manage to clearly state an argument?

In any case, well done for standing down at the point where your "appeal to idiocy" claims would be tested by rational arguement. It, for you, is a wise choice.

Cowardice is better than to be exposed as a liar, right, Xarog? Oops. Too late for that. Too late for both of those.