Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

Status
Not open for further replies.

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472

Politico reported:

While Craig isn’t charged with failing to register as a foreign agent, a key issue at the trial is whether he was honest with Justice Department officials about his role in release of the report, which included providing an advance, embargoed version of the review to the veteran New York Times national security reporter David Sanger.
Gates maintained, however, that the decision to go to The Times through Craig had the desired effect.
“The overall strategy worked. … The article wasn’t the greatest, but at least it was viewed neutrally, so it did have an impact,” Gates said. “From our viewpoint, the success of it was very great.”
Gates conceded that Craig ultimately refused to participate in many of the rollout-related activities that were part of the various plans, but the Manafort aide was emphatic that Craig’s contact with Sanger was a part of the Ukraine team’s broader effort.
“Did Mr. Craig carry out the role that he had promised to carry out in relation to The New York Times?” prosecutor Fernando Campoamor-Sanchez asked.
“He did,” Gates said.
Gates also testified Thursday that, to his knowledge, Craig was the first to raise the possibility of essentially leaking the report to Sanger.
“Mr. Craig had named a reporter from The New York Times as somebody who … he had a specific relationship with that could help with that effort,” Gates said. “He said Mr. Sanger is a tough reporter but a fair reporter, and we wouldn’t necessarily get a good article, but he’s very credible in the space.”
Gates said Craig never said in detail how he knew Sanger. “He just said historically,” Gates said.
Gates also testified that there was some secrecy surrounding the selection of Sanger, at least for a time.

Greg Craig and his defense lawyers claimed that his contact with the New York Times and the media was not part of a larger coordinated effort.

Legal reporter for Politico Josh Gerstein said that Rick Gates also revealed explosive information about Tony Podesta.

“Rick Gates just testified that he told both Tony Podesta and Vin Weber that the the pro-Ukrainian organization they represented was actually a front group for the Ukrainian government,” Gerstein reported.

Recall, corrupt special counsel Robert Mueller gave Tony Podesta immunity in Manafort’s DC case even though he was doing the same work in the Ukraine and also retroactively filled out a FARA form.

Mueller was investigating the Podesta Group and its lobbying work on behalf of a nonprofit group called the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (ECMU).

According to Mueller’s indictments of Gates and Manafort, the Brussels-based European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (ECMU) functioned as a “mouthpiece” for Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine’s pro-Russian president between 2010 and 2014, reported Fox News.

But of course, the idea that Mueller is running interference for the Clintons is just preposterous. :sneaky:
 

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472

Any of the Clinton defenders who keep moaning about "lock her up" willing to admit the investigation into her emails was a sham yet?
 

access

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
13,703
What giant leaps did I make?
So you see a group of Neo-Nazi murderers and terrorists assembled
i saw a group of people in a picture with some funny flag, no idea who they were until i read the link and saw their ideologies
under a white power banner and your first thought is, they're protesting PC culture
i did not know that is a white power banner, my first thought was not protesting pc culture, it was what their ideologies are against according to the link

they protest what ever is against their beliefs according to the ideologies in that link. if you cannot work that out, you must be commenting just to argue.

Oh cool, so who do we blame for antifa's actions?
who do you think 'antifa'scists are angry about. is this a serious question?

both sides are working each other up, fake news, msm news, incorporated ideals, politicians.

at the moment its like a runaway reaction.

i acknowledge that both sides are actively engaging, do you? its kind of like one is more physical and the other more psychological.
 

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472

So assuming China aggressively buys Dollars to weaken the Yuan, and America aggressively buys Yuan to weaken the Dollar, what happens next? :unsure:
 

access

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
13,703

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122

62601ee05317aa03a01dbd9bc37d7840.jpg
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
What will Libertarians and free market champions who support President Trump, say of this?
d5af7d3c915d46da98eea8073f93306a.jpg
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
What will Libertarians and free market champions who support President Trump, say of this?
d5af7d3c915d46da98eea8073f93306a.jpg
Nothing. Trump doesn't have the power to order stuff like that. Lol.

Just the same old trade wars, nothing changed. Everything has been said.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
Pretty sure your ideologically tinted glasses blocked the part where Trump is ordering business how to run their businesses.
You seem to bethe only person in the world that takes Trump's tweets seriously, but only when you need something to moan about.
 

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
Pretty sure your ideologically tinted glasses blocked the part where Trump is ordering business how to run their businesses.
How?

I've never once stated that economic regulations are unneccessary or undersired. However, like most good things, they can be used to excess.

You have to be pretty childish to think that Trump's order is anything but a rhetorical flourish, but even in the case that it isn't, I have zero qualms with it in this context.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
How?

I've never once stated that economic regulations are unneccessary or undersired. However, like most good things, they can be used to excess.

You have to be pretty childish to think that Trump's order is anything but a rhetorical flourish, but even in the case that it isn't, I have zero qualms with it in this context.
The alternative to top down orders is actually teaching people that they need to support their local economy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top