Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pegasus

Honorary Master
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
13,975

President Trump is so eager to complete hundreds of miles of border fence ahead of the 2020 presidential election that he has directed aides to fast-track billions of dollars’ worth of construction contracts, aggressively seize private land and disregard environmental rules, according to current and former officials involved with the project.

He also has told worried subordinates that he will pardon them of any potential wrongdoing should they have to break laws to get the barriers built quickly, those officials said.

Asked for comment, a White House official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Trump is joking when he makes such statements about pardons.

And leftists take the bait...
 

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
Several Democratic National Committee members have a message to their organization’s top leadership: President Trump is crushing us.
After pledging to compete everywhere ahead of the next election, multiple DNC members told The Daily Beast they have privately sounded alarms about the organization’s strategy heading into 2020, emphasizing what they view as Chairman Tom Perez’s inability to reach swing voters in Midwestern battleground states who voted for the president. A handful of Midwestern targets were critical to Trump’s general election success in 2016.
Jim Zogby, who co-chairs the DNC’s ethnic counsel, a group that represents people across different ethnic, racial, national origin, and religious identities, says he has been pushing Perez and other party leaders to expand its outreach to voters in the same areas that Trump successfully captured: Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and—a Democratic sore spot in post-2016 politics—Wisconsin.
But that outreach to the committee has fallen on deaf ears.
“In Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, if we do events in those states that focuses on everyone else but them, that breeds resentment,” Zogby said. “That’s why [former Vice President Joe] Biden and [Sen.] Bernie [Sanders I-VT] do well, because they talk to those folks.”
Zogby was specifically referencing voters from Irish, Italian, Polish, Eastern Central European, Arab, and Armenian-American communities highly concentrated in the Midwest.
“I am frustrated beyond belief at the sheer neglect of the constituencies I represent,” he added.
Zogby’s chief concern—raised by several other current DNC members who spoke with The Daily Beast—is that the Trump campaign is already reaching swing voters while the Democratic Party is overwhelmingly focused on expanding their existing base.
“There’s a general unease right now among operatives and others who believe the DNC is not doing enough to build out the infrastructure before the next election,” one DNC member said, who requested to speak anonymously about internal party conversations.
“There’s a deep concern that while we’re turned inwards, the Trump campaign is already out there talking to general election voters.”


DNC showing anti-white bigotry that's not working for them, why am I not surprised?
:ROFL:
 

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
As the Trump DOJ attempts to sift through exactly what the Obama administration was pulling during the 2016 US election, Attorney General William Barr and his team of investigators are pursuing the following information, according to RealClear Investigations' Paul Sperry.
  • Agendas for former CIA chief John Brennan’s secret interagency task force meetings on alleged Trump-Russia collusion in the spring, summer and fall of 2016, which he sent in envelopes to FBI Director James Comey, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and National Security Adviser Susan Rice.
  • A series of papers that task force, known as the “fusion cell,” drafted for the White House.

  • A classified August 2016 document Brennan hand-delivered in a sealed envelope to Obama containing information from someone Brennan described as "a critical informant close to Putin." The informant is believed to have beeen a Russian source recycled from a largely debunked dossier compiled by ex-British agent Christopher Steele for the Hillary Clinton campaign.
  • An email exchange from December 2016 between Brennan and Comey in which Brennan is said to have argued for using the Steele dossier in early drafts of the task force’s January 2017 intelligence assessment, which spread the narrative that Vladimir Putin personally ordered a hacking operation to harm Hillary Clinton’s election chances against Donald Trump.
  • All drafts of the Russia intelligence assessment, or ICA, along with classified footnotes revealing the sourcing behind it.
  • Confidential source reports, known as FD-1023s, summarizing briefings between FBI agents and the informants and assets they jointly handled with the CIA, including Christopher Steele, Felix Sater, Azra Turk, and ex-Cambridge professor Stefan Halper, who apparently lured Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page overseas, where he secretly tape-recorded them.
  • Transcripts of conversations Halper recorded prior to July 31, 2016, in which Papadopoulos allegedly "denies any illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia,” according to Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz.
  • Copies of all FBI, CIA and State Department records related to Joseph Mifsud, the mysterious Maltese professor whose statements regarding Papadopoulos allegedly triggered the original Russia-collusion probe.
  • Diplomatic cables between Australia and the U.S. that mention former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer’s tip to the FBI that Papadopoulos allegedly bragged about Mifsud telling him the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton.
  • Queries former Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice and U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power made to the NSA between January 2016 and January 2017 to unmask the identities of Trump figures caught up in upstream collections, or intercepts, of foreign nationals -- including logs that remain under lock and key at an Obama Foundation storage site outside Chicago.
  • An Obama "interagency memorandum of understanding" signed by the FBI and CIA enabling outside contractors — including possibly Clinton campaign contractor Fusion GPS — to gain “improper access” (per a court opinion) to raw FISA data from November 2015 to April 2016.
  • Classified notes from late spring 2016 of Comey briefing White House officials on “the [Carter] Page information.”
  • At least four previously undisclosed, sealed Comey memos memorializing his conversations with Trump that are said to document the investigative steps taken by the FBI, as well as the codename and true name of a “confidential human source” — and evidence obtained from this source, including the identification of at least one Trump target.
  • Allegedly rejected FISA applications for warrants to spy on Page filed in June and July of 2016.
  • FISA applications to monitor Papadopoulos, former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort in 2016 -- in addition to all versions of the Page applications that were approved from October 2016 to June 2017, along with supporting materials.
  • All summaries of interviews the FBI conducted with Steele in 2016, known as FD-302s, as well as the unredacted 302 reports of the FBI's dozen interviews with Justice official Bruce Ohr, who provided back-channel briefings from Steele after the FBI terminated him in November 2016.
  • FBI 302 reports summarizing 2016 meetings with Russian oligarch (and FBI informant) Oleg Deripaska, who reportedly scoffed at the idea that Trump colluded with Moscow when agents visited him in New York.
  • FBI 302s of agents’ Feb. 10, 2017, interview with Mifsud during which the Mueller Report says Mifsud lied to agents.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Leftists at work...

A) it's from 2018
B) the context of this snippet is that the speaker Marcel de Graaff is claiming that the UN resolution is going to make criticism of migration a criminal offense. The person speaking is not the one pushing the law, he is inaccurately criticizing the proposed new law.


One objection aired by Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff is that the agreement sets the precedent for countries to enact law that makes: “criticism of migration … a criminal offense.”

This is incorrect. The document asks nations to “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination…against all migrants.” And any country that took this further and tried to criminalise criticism of migration would likely be breaching human rights legislation.

Making sure migrants aren’t discriminated against is a very different thing to asking states to criminalise criticism of migration. The document explicitly says: “We also commit to protect freedom of expression.”


Please check your sources before posting stuff.
 

scudsucker

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
9,024
I really don't follow what's going on there.
Strange- it is your best pal, Xarog, posting. I thought you guys were new best friends?

And here you are implying that Xarog doesnt make any sense.

Don't worry, Emjay, on that count - at the very least - I am on your side.
 
Last edited:

scudsucker

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
9,024
It's a desperate attempt to convince Q believers to unfollow/block all the prominent Q accounts, as if this would somehow stem the tide of inevitability. :ROFL:
And how much, exactly, do you believe in any of the Q thing being truthful, Xarog?

Enought to place a bet?
 
Last edited:

Arthur

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
26,879
It's also nonsense. Ilhan Omar isn't an illegal immigrant.
Too soon to say. Compelling evidence of immigration fraud is emerging. If it turns out to be true she faces deportation or up to forty years in jail.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
A) it's from 2018
B) the context of this snippet is that the speaker Marcel de Graaff is claiming that the UN resolution is going to make criticism of migration a criminal offense. The person speaking is not the one pushing the law, he is inaccurately criticizing the proposed new law.


One objection aired by Dutch MEP Marcel de Graaff is that the agreement sets the precedent for countries to enact law that makes: “criticism of migration … a criminal offense.”

This is incorrect. The document asks nations to “commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination…against all migrants.” And any country that took this further and tried to criminalise criticism of migration would likely be breaching human rights legislation.

Making sure migrants aren’t discriminated against is a very different thing to asking states to criminalise criticism of migration. The document explicitly says: “We also commit to protect freedom of expression.”


Please check your sources before posting stuff.

But what would they have left if they can't just lie brazenly?
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Too soon to say. Compelling evidence of immigration fraud is emerging. If it turns out to be true she faces deportation or up to forty years in jail.

lol Arthur, are you seriously also falling for this obvious guff?

I'm mildly disappointed.
 

Gingerbeardman

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
5,472
Too soon to say. Compelling evidence of immigration fraud is emerging. If it turns out to be true she faces deportation or up to forty years in jail.
Funnily enough, if she goes home she can look forward to being stoned for adultery...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top