Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

[NarrowBandFtw]

Funnily enough, if she goes home she can look forward to being stoned for adultery...

ah but she will die with a smile on her face having tasted true tolerance and diversity, the likes of which the fascist USA cannot provide

 

[Emjay]

I see the DNC is up to its usual tricks again.

How the DNC is unfairly tilting the field against Tulsi Gabbard

After the fiasco that was the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, the Democratic National Committee doesn’t exactly have a reputation for impartiality and fairness. You’d think, then, the DNC would take steps this time around to ensure that its decision-making is transparent and bias-free.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[OrbitalDawn]

I see the DNC is up to its usual tricks again.

How the DNC is unfairly tilting the field against Tulsi Gabbard

After the fiasco that was the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, the Democratic National Committee doesn’t exactly have a reputation for impartiality and fairness. You’d think, then, the DNC would take steps this time around to ensure that its decision-making is transparent and bias-free.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Eh, this is silly.

The criteria is not remotely unknown or opaque. It's been public information since 29 May.

DNC Announces Details For Third Presidential Primary Debate - Democrats

democrats.org

And the criteria kicked out a bunch of 'establishment' candidates, too.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Eh, this is silly.

The criteria is not remotely unknown or opaque. It's been public information since 29 May.

DNC Announces Details For Third Presidential Primary Debate - Democrats

democrats.org

And the criteria kicked out a bunch of 'establishment' candidates, too.

1. Polling Threshold. Candidates must receive 2% or more support in at least four polls (which may be national polls, or polls in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and/or Nevada) meeting the following criteria (“Qualifying Poll Criteria”):

1. • Each poll must be sponsored by an approved organization,

Can you explain why the DNC's choice of what is considered an "approved organisation" isn't arbitrary?

I'm gonna go ahead and guess that you can't.

 

[OrbitalDawn]

Can you explain why the DNC's choice of what is considered an "approved organisation" isn't arbitrary?

I'm gonna go ahead and guess that you can't.

Any criteria that is exclusionary can be accused of being arbitrary.

They want to (rightly) winnow the field for the debates, and at this point if these campaigns can't even breach 2% with some consistency they aren't going anywhere.

 

[Techne]

"DNC-approved"... corrupt little twats.

 

[cerebus]

Too soon to say. Compelling evidence of immigration fraud is emerging. If it turns out to be true she faces deportation or up to forty years in jail.

Link? I guess you're talking about the conspiracy that Emjay was going on about a while ago, it's been largely discredited. But don't worry, as long as your standard of proof is low enough you can keep on believing that she'll be deported for marrying her brother

 

[Arthur]

Link? I guess you're talking about the conspiracy that Emjay was going on about a while ago, it's been largely discredited. But don't worry, as long as your standard of proof is low enough you can keep on believing that she'll be deported for marrying her brother

I'll wait for the courts to decide, thank-you. Wonder why you won't.

 

[cerebus]

I'll wait for the courts to decide, thank-you.

Lol. It's never going to see the inside of a courtroom. The whole thing is ridiculously flimsy.

This article attempted to dig into the story with some rigor and came up with nothing:

PolitiFact - Did Ilhan Omar marry her brother? Her hometown newspaper investigated and told us what they found

For years, critics of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., have raised questions about her marriages and made the explosive claim t

www.politifact.com

So I assigned a couple of reporters to go back over the case. It turned out that most of the evidence behind (the notion that she had married her brother) was in social media. So we looked at the social media trail. It had been wiped clean, and that piqued our interest even more. But because the posts had been wiped, we had to rely on screen grabs that had been posted by people who we know have an ax to grind. So it was tricky.

Were these social media posts the main evidence for the allegation that she had married her brother?
As far as I can tell, it’s really only the social media posts. It seemed clear that there is some kind of personal relationship between Omar and Elmi. But whether they are family or not, we can’t tell. We weren’t able to come close to determining whether that was the truth. And frankly, we were wary of drawing any conclusions.

 

[rietrot]

ah but she will die with a smile on her face having tasted true tolerance and diversity, the likes of which the fascist USA cannot provide

It would obviously be Trumps fault for sending her home. Almost like he is going to throw the first stone.

 

[rietrot]

Can you explain why the DNC's choice of what is considered an "approved organisation" isn't arbitrary?

I'm gonna go ahead and guess that you can't.

It's kinda sad that they learned nothing from the last election cycle. I would have like a closer race whit a decent candidate.

 

[access]

For anyone not understanding what's up with China.

lol.. barbarian management. and the south african government fall for it hook line and sinker.

 

[C4Cat]

Link? I guess you're talking about the conspiracy that Emjay was going on about a while ago, it's been largely discredited. But don't worry, as long as your standard of proof is low enough you can keep on believing that she'll be deported for marrying her brother

Apparently some random guy's blog is now "compelling evidence". Arthur's standards have hit a new low here

I'll wait for the courts to decide, thank-you. Wonder why you won't.

don't hold your breath waiting

 

[Arthur]

Apparently some random guy's blog is now "compelling evidence". Arthur's standards have hit a new low here
don't hold your breath waiting

Random guy's blog? More like a letter to a county court by State Representative Steve Drazkowski.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=785685308500686

 

[C4Cat]

Random guy's blog? More like a letter to a county court by State Representative Steve Drazkowski.

I don't see any evidence she's an illegal immigrant and once again, social media posts are not compelling evidence, even if they are printed out and presented by Steve.

 

[Arthur]

I don't see any evidence she's an illegal immigrant and once again, social media posts are not compelling evidence, even if they are printed out and presented by Steve.

Agreed. I don't even have a FB account. The link was sent by a friend. So let's wait and see what happens. This isn't over yet.

 

[rietrot]

I don't see any evidence she's an illegal immigrant and once again, social media posts are not compelling evidence, even if they are printed out and presented by Steve.

It's getting to that. A court will decide. I definitely think even if she is illegal she is to high profile and politics will win over justice. She'll get to stay on some technicality.

 

[Unhappy438]

Im still trying to understand the right wing love in with Tulsi? She is just about a young female version of Bernie.

 

[rietrot]

Im still trying to understand the right wing love in with Tulsi? She is just about a young female version of Bernie.

Well being the young and especially female version makes her better. Who wants a old white, male

I can't think why the left aren't falling over themselves to make her president.

 

[Temujin]

Im still trying to understand the right wing love in with Tulsi? She is just about a young female version of Bernie.

Probably because you still don't understand that majority of people you label 'right wing' aren't... as soon as you realise that, it'll start making sense