Donald J. Trump: President of the USA Part III Covfefe

[greg0205]

If the media had treated Trump like they treat other politicians, his campaign would have been dead before it started. His idiocy has been treated with much more gentleness and credibility than it deserves.

More than that.

He had a well established reputation as a serial liar, financial failure and relationship cheat with most media houses, but they *still* gave him a clean slate and wall-to-wall coverage and they called it a level playing field.

 

[Emjay]

Don't need to bring race into it, it's bad enough already. Definitely not justified.

Just pointing out the double standard.

More than that.

He had a well established reputation as a serial liar, financial failure and relationship cheat with most media houses, but they *still* gave him a clean slate and wall-to-wall coverage and they called it a level playing field.

And he still managed to beat Hillary. Imagine that.

That's how unlikable she was. And how badly the DNC messed up. Looks like they are heading down the same road again. So much fun in store for us over the next two years.

 

[greg0205]

Just pointing out the double standard.



And he still managed to beat Hillary. Imagine that.

That's how unlikable she was. And how badly the DNC messed up. Looks like they are heading down the same road again. So much fun in store for us over the next two years.

Oh Emjay.

Read what I wrote again... Then take a moment to think about it.

Then get back to me.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

That's how unlikable she was. And how badly the DNC messed up. Looks like they are heading down the same road again. So much fun in store for us over the next two years.

Haha, libs are mad as hell at Howard Schultz atm. *popcorn time*

 

[Emjay]

Oh Emjay.

Read what I wrote again... Then take a moment to think about it.

Then get back to me.

Hillary was polled to win. She was the media darling, so please cry some more.

Talking about media:

As has been the case since the President took office, the tone of network coverage has been exceptionally hostile, ranging from 82% negative in April 2017 (after Trump was praised for a missile strike punishing Syria for a chemical weapons attack) to 96% negative in February 2018 (when the news agenda focused on the Russia investigation, demands for gun control, and a White House aide accused of domestic abuse).

Remarkably consistent:

The 90% negative spin we calculated roughly matches what the Pew Research Center, not a conservative group, found in their study of coverage of Trump’s first 60 days in office. They found 62% of network stories were negative, vs. 5% positive and 33% neutral. If you remove the neutral stories and look at just the stories with a clear spin, Pew’s bottom line looks like ours: 93% negative spin, vs. just 7% positive.

Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson looked at coverage of Trump’s first 100 days in office. He found NBC’s coverage was 93% negative, CBS’s 91% negative; ABC was not included. His study also found highly negative coverage from leading newspapers and CNN, while only Fox News offered balanced coverage (52% negative vs. 48% positive).

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...hed-trump-90-negative-spin-2018-did-it-matter

 

[greg0205]

Hillary was polled to win. She was the media darling, so please cry some more.

Talking about media:








https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/n...hed-trump-90-negative-spin-2018-did-it-matter

Donald John Trump - 62 979 636 votes
Hillary Rodham Clinton - 65 844 610 votes

Also

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsbusters/

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Donald John Trump - 62 979 636 votes
Hillary Rodham Clinton - 65 844 610 votes

Also

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsbusters/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/snopes/

Find a less garbage site to work from, kthx.

 

[Unhappy438]

Talking about media:

Doesnt Trump have the lowest average approval rating of any president since world war two? Would then make sense that he is spoken about negatively in the media since his election.

 

[greg0205]

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/snopes/

Find a less garbage site to work from, kthx.

Aah the old, I-don't-like-it-so-it's-fake-news chestnut. Surprising, said no one ever.

 

[Emjay]

Donald John Trump - 62 979 636 votes
Hillary Rodham Clinton - 65 844 610 votes

Also

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsbusters/

If only the Constitution actually worked that way.

And, if you read the article, it makes mention of other studies which back up it's claims.

Doesnt Trump have the lowest average approval rating of any president since world war two? Would then make sense that he is spoken about negatively in the media since his election.

At one stage (before the shut down), I think it was actually running higher the Obama's. There was a link in the other thread a few days ago.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

Aah the old, I-don't-like-it-so-it's-fake-news chestnut. Surprising, said no one ever.

No, that's what you did to Emjay. I am merely pointing out what a garbage site you used to do it.

 

[Unhappy438]

At one stage (before the shut down), I think it was actually running higher the Obama's. There was a link in the other thread a few days ago.

Average approval rating

 

[Emjay]

Average approval rating

No idea. I am sure you know how to use Google?

 

[Unhappy438]

No idea. I am sure you know how to use Google?

Ok then let me state it as fact:

Trump has the lowest average approval rating of any president since world war two! It makes sense then that he is spoken about negatively in the media since his election.

 

[greg0205]

If only the Constitution actually worked that way.

... and if only polsters had a better way of accounting for the difference 77 744 votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan would make to a campaign that won by 2 864 974 votes in the popular vote.

If only Emjay, if only.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

... and if only polsters had a better way of accounting for the difference 77 744 votes in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan would make to a campaign that won by 2 864 974 votes in the popular vote.

If only Emjay, if only.

Too bad Hillary never thought to campaign there and instead focused on places like California, where she already had it in the bag, huh?

 

[greg0205]

No, that's what you did to Emjay.

I did, didn’t I? Three extra hail Marys for me at bedtime it seems.

 

[greg0205]

Too bad Hillary never thought to campaign there and instead focused on places like California, where she already had it in the bag, huh?

That’s exactly the point I was making. Well done GBM!

 

[Gingerbeardman]

That’s exactly the point I was making. Well done GBM!

On the other hand, if the elections had not been ruled by the electoral college, one would expect Trump would have had the good sense to go to places like California where there's such a retardedly huge percentage of the American national population...

 

[Techne]

Oh man, at least two more years of all these butthurt demdrones. Glorious.