Donald John Trump: The 2nd Greatest President of the USA (by volume)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,916
Hey, we agree on something. Whaddya know. :p

'tis true, though. Protesting is all well and good, but if they don't follow through with action at the ballot box it's not enough.

Same goes for SA. Luckily we have seen change in PTA, JHB, PE etc.

Yeah but when your options are trump or hillary and you would rather vote explosive diarrhea, what then. Protest seems like your only legitimate action.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Well, whaddya know indeed...I feel all warm and fuzzy inside. :D Happy remainder of Sunday, everyone. :)

Cheers. :)

Yeah but when your options are trump or hillary and you would rather vote explosive diarrhea, what then. Protest seems like your only legitimate action.

Sure, but then you pinch your nose, vote Clinton because she's more sane policy wise, and then protest/push like hell to pressure her administration. I'm totally on board with you regarding keeping the pressure on, post-election. It's what people should do to the DA, too. Don't relax now that they've taken more metros. Keep the pressure on.
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,916
Sure, but then you pinch your nose, vote Clinton because she's more sane policy wise, and then protest/push like hell to pressure her administration. I'm totally on board with you regarding keeping the pressure on, post-election. It's what people should do to the DA, too. Don't relax now that they've taken more metros. Keep the pressure on.

I honestly think Clinton is abhorrent and evil , I don't think I could vote for her despite Trump. Plus I really don't like the whole family dynasty thing like Bush and Kennedy
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Here's the sad part:

Rural America, already hurting, could be most harmed by Trump’s promise to repeal Obamacare

The health of rural America is failing, and a repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) without adequate replacement could prove disastrous. A December, 2016 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that for the first time in 20 years, life expectancy in the United States has declined, particularly in small cities and rural areas, where people are dying at much higher rates. This shocking trend is driven in part by increasing mortality rates for white, working-class Americans, many of whom live in rural America.

...

Taken as a whole, Medicaid expansion through the ACA has resulted in critical gains toward improving rural population health by expanding insurance coverage and stabilizing rural hospitals.

The repeal of Medicaid expansion and collapse of the individual insurance market, which could occur as part of repeal of the ACA, could threaten strides the country has made in advancing the health of rural America.

It is no surprise that rural Americans experienced the highest rates of coverage gains through the ACA. They have been more likely to have had inadequate access to affordable health care for years. This dramatic increase in insurance is translating into improved health for these communities.

For example, in Arkansas and Kentucky, Medicaid expansion resulted in fewer people skipping medications due to cost, a decline in difficulty paying medical bills and an increase in regular doctor visits for chronic illnesses.
 

whatwhat

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
6,353
First day in office and Trump already got thousands of woman out of the kitchen and marching in the streets.

Imagine the progress after 8 years.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
No its not. Less than a quarter of voters chose Trump.
What bs. It was almost 50-50. Maybe you can claim Clinton got 51% or 52% if you really want to beat the popular vote drum, but that's pointless as that isn't how their system works.
If people don't use their votes it doesn't count.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
What bs. It was almost 50-50. .

46.2 vs 48.1, if you want to be accurate; not sure where the 'less than a quarter' statistic comes from. And of the electoral college win, that came down to around 79,000 votes that swung the difference, out of around 130 million total. I'd say American voters have a right to feel ripped off at the election results. Wait till those who actually voted for Trump realize how much his election promises meant.
 

schumi

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
25,085
US legal watchdog to sue Trump over foreign payments

A US legal watchdog says it will file a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, alleging he is violating a constitutional ban on accepting payments from foreign governments.

The group of lawyers and researchers say he is receiving payments from foreign governments via guests at his hotels and leases on his buildings.

They argue that a clause in the constitution bans such payments.

Mr Trump's son Eric described the move as "harassment for political gain".

Eric Trump, who is an executive vice-president of the Trump Organization, said the company had taken greater steps than the law required to avoid legal exposure, the New York Times reported.

He said it had agreed to donate any hotel profits that come from foreign government guests to the US treasury.

'We were forced to take action'


Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew) said it would file the lawsuit in a Manhattan federal court on Monday morning.

"We did not want to get to this point," Crew executive director Noah Bookbinder said in a statement.

"It was our hope that President Trump would take the necessary steps to avoid violating the Constitution before he took office. We were forced to take legal action."

More at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38714446
 

BBSA

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
21,905
Pic comparing inauguration turnouts:

Only to be expected. Trump's supporters are mainly from out of town, from "flyover country". Obama's supporters are mainly urbanites, and uber-Democrat DC has two hundred thousand Dem-voting fedgov bureaucrats/employees who absolutely lurv Obama, out in force at his inaugs.

Reading too much into the pic is to risk making the same mistake the MSM pundits and pollsters made three months ago: misread the signs of the times.

46.2 vs 48.1, if you want to be accurate; not sure where the 'less than a quarter' statistic comes from. And of the electoral college win, that came down to around 79,000 votes that swung the difference, out of around 130 million total. I'd say American voters have a right to feel ripped off at the election results. Wait till those who actually voted for Trump realize how much his election promises meant.

Those voters did not really had a choice, the alternative had a record of lying. Most of them was just tired of the liberal nonsense.
 

Shayd

Expert Member
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
3,276
This is going to be an interesting 4 years. I wonder if putting a businessman in the White House will lead to a faster growing economy. If Trump delivers growth and jobs, there is going to be a lot of whining in 4 years..

What am I saying, there is going to be a lot of whining no matter what happens.
 

C4Cat

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
14,307
Yoh, is this what people refer to as being triggered? [video=youtube_share;0RMwjaZouNY]https://youtu.be/0RMwjaZouNY[/video]
 

Nick333

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
35,114
Yoh, is this what people refer to as being triggered? [video=youtube_share;0RMwjaZouNY]https://youtu.be/0RMwjaZouNY[/video]
To be fair I didn't catch it the first time I watched him, but outrage is his shtick.
 

Arthur

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
26,879
This whole discussion on inaug crowds and popularity polls raises an interesting conundrum for the MSM that I've not seen addressed in the media:

Here's the MSM narrative:

The Trump inaug was particularly poorly attended - far smaller crowds than the hugely popular Barry Soetoro/Obama at his inaugs.
There was no large-scale popular turnout in DC to support Big Orange on his Big Day. The photos prove it.
Furthermore, he is the least popular POTUS at inaug than any previous president. Polls prove it.
Add in a reminder that Clinton won the popular vote, and we have the picture of an unpopular president opposed by the majority.

Fair enough. I don't have a problem with that. It might well be true.

But here's the problem:

So how then can Trump be both a populist and unpopular?

They can't have it both ways. The very notion of an unpopular populist is a contradiction in terms. Especially when you're arguing that your favourite candidate is more popular, with broader majority support.

On the other hand, Trump is claiming the crowds were huge. He seems to be saying he has broader popular support than Clinton. Yet the MSM are doing all they can to undermine that claim.

The ironies of politics are many indeed. Interesting times.

All the more so when we recall that for EU elites the term "populist" is about the worst thing you could possibly say about anyone's politics (understandably so, given their experience in the last century).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top