Eskom’s coal-fired power station breakdown lie

Read and weep:
An interesting observation is that Scherer and Wansley had an upward trend in their EAF figures as time progressed.

The large differential suggests that ageing infrastructure can still be reliable. With regular maintenance and using the latest technology, their performance can even improve.
 
Eskom’s latest EAF date, shared by electricity minister Kgosientso Ramokgopa, shows that age is not a big factor in breakdowns and poor performance.

  • Three of the newest power stations – Kusile (37%), Majuba (48%), and Kendal (47%) – have some of the worst EAF of all plants in Eskom’s fleet.
  • Eskom’s oldest power stations – Camden (70%) and Grootvlei (90%) – have some of the best EAF of all plants in Eskom’s fleet.
The EAF data further showed that Tutuka (26%), rife with corruption and mismanagement, has a much worse EAF than other power stations of the same age, like Letabo (74%) and Matimba (75%).

It clearly illustrates that age is not significant in EAF but rather how well the power station is managed.
And they're only figuring this out now?

/s

giphy.gif
 
Tell us something we don't know...

Interesting that the older plants who probably have legacy staff from the bad old days are running better than the newer ones.
Off course you decide to go racial instead of addressing the obvious reason the old plants are doing better, in fact the whole post ignores the most obvious reason as to why the older plants are able to have a higher EAF
 
Off course you decide to go racial instead of addressing the obvious reason the old plants are doing better, in fact the whole post ignores the most obvious reason as to why the older plants are able to have a higher EAF
You just have to think of the worst possible thing right from the start, don't you? No facts, just "RACISM!!"
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter