Eskom has a net-billing tariff plan — with some heavy limits

So the TOU thing makes all the sense in the world in all honesty... it should have been implemented more than a decade ago.

But this limiting usage of credit to the TOU bracket you generated it in is just fscking retarded in the extreme as a starting point... also having a peak price at around R7 a kwh is also fscking retarded. at that point its very like cheaper for me to run a diesel generator for power than it is to draw off the grid.
Doubt it most likely the diesel generator will still work out moret

Just using google consumption searches

ie light load 1L per hour ie R22 for 2kw R11per kwh

Sure maybe at full load 3L/h and hour 8kw load the economics look better at R8.25
But it isn't like we all have 8kw lying around to allways get that rate, and still more expensive than that ridiculous R7 a unit

And maintenance extra costs

It baffles me that people still buy generators for home use

Sure they may make sense where the layout for battery backup is still astronomical if the load is too much ie your store or other high consumption enterprise

Though i haven't given it much thought why do the math on multiple usage levels to see how they compare , keyboard warrior is a fun game as long as you don't have to sacrifice too much time to do the actual math
 
What they talking about 'peak hours'.... we're literally perma-peak for years now, every hour is peak hour, there is not enough supply thus load shedding, we burn our 'peakers' just to get through a sunday afternoon ffs :ROFL:
Sure if they make the off peak cheaper some may shift some load around

If we did not have round the clock loadshedding ie just peak times it would make things better

As it is now it will just give us a more constant lower stage number round the clock
 
The other problem I see is that you can't actually -easily- design a hybrid smart system to take benefit from different grid pricing at different times. Hell even running a system without trying to take advantage of peak vs. off peak can be a daunting task that takes weeks to fine-tune (if you've built a system based on your actual usage, for most that'll be a typical 5kWh system with one battery like mine). The problem is loadshedding, the massive amount of unplanned outages many of us are experiencing and all that combined with unexpected cloudy days etc.

It becomes almost impossible to plan or automate without risking being left in the dark. The only people who could possibly benefit are probably those who have massively oversized systems with enough buffer... but those systems and the associated roof space and needed cost just don't make sense for most people, at least not yet.

Typically the idea is to use my stored solar to power my devices at night so I can refill the batteries with sunlight in the morning, so I want them to be at a low SOC in the morning on purpose... that doesn't cost anything so even lower grid rates at off-peak times are useless and I don't want a full battery when the sun comes up... unless of course there's an outage or bad weather is coming, but you really can't know.... those are the kinds of thing I think about each night before bed and plan/adjust my system accordingly if needed.

During peak/work hours it becomes more crucial to feed from the grid sometimes if the weather sucks for instance or if there's a multi-day unplanned outage, so not using Eskom during peak hours falls off the list.

Ultimately for me it comes down to this:
- Either get a hybrid system that's not oversized and can keep you going when it needs to with intermittent grid charging here and there when it's needed, regardless of what time slots it uses.
- Get a proper off-grid system and tell Eskom to GTFO.

Funny enough some of the issues I mentioned above goes away for those of us living in the Highveld during winter. Sure the days are shorter but the quality and consistency of sunlight makes everything easier (the "will the sun shine tomorrow" dimension goes away). The past few rainy weeks we've had is when I usually monitor my system the most

Now allow me a small prayer to the Electron Gods:
Thank God for decent inverters in the year 2024 AD with proper blending and precise configurable time slot charging and minimum battery level specifications....
/PrayerDerail
Trust me on this: if you're someone looking at a cheaper Growatt/Mecer etc. inverter 'cause you want to save 5000 bucks... do yourself a massive favor and DON'T DO IT... I'm saving more money now and have less issues with just 4 solar panels in a crappy spot and a decent inverter than I did with my 6 panels in a perfect spot with a cheaper Growatt inverter
 
Last edited:
The other problem I see is that you can't actually -easily- design a hybrid smart system to take benefit from different grid pricing at different times. Hell even running a system without trying to take advantage of peak vs. off peak can be a daunting task that takes weeks to fine-tune (if you've built a system based on your actual usage, for most that'll be a typical 5kWh system with one battery like mine). The problem is loadshedding, the massive amount of unplanned outages many of us are experiencing and all that combined with unexpected cloudy days etc.

It becomes almost impossible to plan or automate without risking being left in the dark. The only people who could possibly benefit are probably those who have massively oversized systems with enough buffer... but those systems and the associated roof space and needed cost just don't make sense for most people, at least not yet.

Typically the idea is to use my stored solar to power my devices at night so I can refill the batteries with sunlight in the morning, so I want them to be at a low SOC in the morning on purpose... that doesn't cost anything so even lower grid rates at off-peak times are useless and I don't want a full battery when the sun comes up... unless of course there's an outage or bad weather is coming, but you really can't know.... those are the kinds of thing I think about each night before bed and plan/adjust my system accordingly if needed.

During peak/work hours it becomes more crucial to feed from the grid sometimes if the weather sucks for instance or if there's a multi-day unplanned outage, so not using Eskom during peak hours falls off the list.

Ultimately for me it comes down to this:
- Either get a hybrid system that's not oversized and can keep you going when it needs to with intermittent grid charging here and there when it's needed, regardless of what time slots it uses.
- Get a proper off-grid system and tell Eskom to GTFO.

Funny enough some of the issues I mentioned above goes away for those of us living in the Highveld during winter. Sure the days are shorter but the quality and consistency of sunlight makes everything easier (the "will the sun shine tomorrow" dimension goes away). The past few rainy weeks we've had is when I usually monitor my system the most

Now allow me a small prayer to the Electron Gods:
Thank God for decent inverters in the year 2024 AD with proper blending and precise configurable time slot charging and minimum battery level specifications....
/PrayerDerail
Trust me on this: if you're someone looking at a cheaper Growatt/Mecer etc. inverter 'cause you want to save 5000 bucks... do yourself a massive favor and DON'T DO IT... I'm saving more money now and have way less issues with just 4 solar panels in a crappy spot and a decent inverter than I did with my 6 panels in a perfect spot with a cheaper Growatt inverter
Maybe you can give me some advise on how you’ve set up your system. I’ve been quite lazy to actually get the benefit out of my system.
I’ve got an 8KW inverter with 5KW Hubble battery and 4x 540W Canadian solar panels.
I’ve got a built in 2 plate gas stove and gas geyser.
I’ve actually only just set the inverter to use grid power when the battery gets to 80%.
So naturally I use the system more for load shedding than any actual cost saving.

I’d appreciate if you could shed light (excuse the pun) on how I could get the most out of my system.
 
Eskom has a net-billing tariff plan — with some heavy limits

A new tariff plan with electricity net-billing introduced by Eskom in the past year provides little incentive for households to feed power back into the grid but offers potential cost savings when charging batteries outside peak hours.

The Homeflex tariff was one of several changes that Eskom proposed for electricity tariffs about a year and a half ago.
My question is how is the prepaid customers going to benefit out of this off peak charging option?
 
Couldn't even read halfway through this convoluted f**ing mess of an idea.
My degree didn't sufficiently prepare me to navigate and benefit from this model.
Maybe that's the whole point.
/ignore and pay more.

"Eskom argued this was necessary because those with grid-tied solar and batteries were effectively paying subsidised tariffs by those without their own power."

What an utter load of horsesh*t.

Am I stupid, or are Eskom saying that the poor are paying to subsidize people installing solar? The poor paying R100 a month are subsiding the guy spending 250K of his own money to install solar?

Because if that is what they are saying them their brains have evaporated beyond repair
 
Maybe you can give me some advise on how you’ve set up your system. I’ve been quite lazy to actually get the benefit out of my system.
I’ve got an 8KW inverter with 5KW Hubble battery and 4x 540W Canadian solar panels.
I’ve got a built in 2 plate gas stove and gas geyser.
I’ve actually only just set the inverter to use grid power when the battery gets to 80%.
So naturally I use the system more for load shedding than any actual cost saving.

I’d appreciate if you could shed light (excuse the pun) on how I could get the most out of my system.

So you've basically got the same basic system as I have... even though my inverter is only 5kWh (it's a fanless Deye BTW)

It's hard to give someone else advice on this since we're all doing out own thing and have different requirements.
Also, keep in mind I live alone so it's easier to predict my patterns, I'm assuming it gets much harder with a family around... although, it shouldn't be that much different... I don't know, my mail-order bride got lost in the SAPOS system. Bless her heart.

That said, here's my current time slot config from Solar Assistant:
If you're not familiar with Solar Assistant or these time slots, the Power setting is just how much/fast I allow the battery to be charged from the grid, typical newer 5kWh LFP batteries can take 1C (meaning 5000 Watts charging) but it's typically better to stay below that if you can, the slower you charge it the longer it takes of course, but also improves the battery charge cycles in the long term and it's better to go lower if you can so you don't become a power sucking problem when the grid goes up again. The State of Charge percentage is what you want the battery level to be... meaning if it's below that it'll charge from the grid if the grid is available. If the battery is above that percentage nothing happens. It'll just keep charging for solar as normal if it's available.

1705513339618.png

By the way it's probably not optimized, but that's 'cause it works for me right now so saving a buck here or there isn't at the top of my list.

Also, in regards to "losses", meaning times where the battery is full but I'm getting solar energy in, the inverter is hooked up to dump that energy into the geyser as long as the battery level is at or higher than the preferred charge state in the setting I've provided above. I'd assume yours is set up the same, if not, definitely look into that. You can identify an oversized system relatively easily this way, your battery will be full and your solar input will be almost nothing even when the sun is shining (or even if it's cloudy but you see almost no energy coming in). That's all wasted energy (that should have been fed back into the grid). Happens often on mine so that's how I know my system isn't optimized. But until feedback is a viable option I'm prioritizing availability because I work from home and haven't had an issue yet.

Summary:
Let's start after work at night, 9PM

Between 9PM and 1AM I allow the system to "quick charge" from the Grid to 65% if needed. That covers me if there's an outage during a time when there's no solar available and when I'm either asleep, drunk or just chilling in front of the TV, that keeps my fridge, night lights and security system running all night if needed. If the grid isn't available in that slot, well, then I use whatever the battery has to to give. I'd prefer this to be lower but with cable theft in the area it's better to charge if you can before the stealing starts (they usually steal between 1AM and 5AM).

Between 1AM and 7AM I allow the grid to keep the battery at 50% if the grid's available. If not then it's fine, there's enough to let the battery run down to just above it's recommended SOC, mine's set at 15% but 20% is usually the sweet spot with LFP batteries. I'd prefer the SOC to be lower, say 30-40%, but decided on 50% recently due to it being summer and cloudy. Will likely go down in Winter to my preferred setting of 30%.

Then, usually between 7AM and 9AM is when the sun starts doing its thing. I've adjusted it recently to keep the battery at 50% just because of the weather, but again like the time slot above, I'll take this setting down again when the weather becomes more predictable. This should typically have the lowest preferred SOC setting of the day since you really shouldn't need the grid to kick in at this point while you're waiting for that sweet-sweet solar energy.

From 9AM to 1PM I allow a slower grid charge to keep me at 40%, this is typically also too high since that's the perfect time slot for the batteries to be filled from solar, however I just keep it there now in case there's outages again, and also again, the weather. In Winter this slot will go down to 20-30%, easy 'cause I know the pack will charge fully from only Solar even if I'm using as many appliances as I can while the system is charging. (My max wattage on the panels is usually 2200 Watts between 12PM and 1PM)

Then from 1PM to 5PM I use grid again to keep the batteries at 85% if possible. This is typically too high as well BUT I keep it there for now sicne if the batteries (as the usually do) were charged fully during the 9AM to 1PM slot then it won't even use the grid, but if they aren't at 85% during this slot then something obviously went wrong (bad weather or outage) so this settings makes sense and works well for me. This is a very important timeslot. You want to go into dusk knowing you have energy. Even if you don't and the weather is crappy, then you can at least switch off some non-critical devices and even switch off the fridge etc. until the next morning to see what happens at dawn.

Then 5PM to 9PM I try to dump as much energy into the battery from grid again to keep it at 90% just in case there's an outage over night and bad weather the next day... however I think this setting is too high, I keep it because it gives me peace of mind.

Here's my usage for the past 12 Days.
As far as I'm concerned this is worst case scenario... so that's a good measuring stick.
The days where my solar vs. grid power is roughly 50/50 are the days where it's sunnier... the rest you can bet were cloudy days.

It's kind of obvious to me that if I wanted to go "off grid", I need to double my battery capacity and possibly double my panels too... so 10kWh battery storage with 8 X 550Watt panels... that's actually really not that bad. The only issue I have is space. But will figure that out somehow.

The first thing I would do is double my battery capacity, when monitoring the system throughout the day I'm noticing a lot of energy that doesn't have anywhere to go... I think that's where a lot of people get it wrong, they use general calculations to size the system so they add tons of panels but then don't realize that for hours at a time those panels are just idling and doing nothing, fine if you want to cater for cloudy days but you can also increase battery capacity for those situations (granted, panels are cheaper per watt so I'm likely wrong here. not really sure yet)

1705517288254.png


Another hard-learned tip I would add for people with smaller solar systems is this: Solar PV voltage.
Dearlord, I literally doubled my PV efficiency and input by changing to slightly higher voltage panels. My previous 4 panels were just licking the bottom of the barrel on my inverter in regards to how much DC voltage it needed from the panels.... sure the the system was still working, but the MPPT controller was working overtime... Once I changed to 50V panels instead of 38V I literally doubled my PV input.
 
Last edited:
Not being able to sell at high tariffs and buy at low tariffs makes this plan somewhat pointless...

Although you can charge at lower rates (or self-generate during the day) and offset high-priced usage against your batteries.
 
Playing devils advocate, it kind of makes sense. If there are 100 people and everyone was paying R2k per month to Eskom then they made R200k per month. Lets say R50k of this was for grid maintenance and R150k was for production (so Eskom makes no profit)

Now half of the users go and get solar and pay Eskom R0 per month instead of the R2000 they were paying before. So Eskom revenue is now 50 x 0 + 50 x 2000 = R100k. The grid maintenance is still R50k so they have only R50k to spend on production whereas they had R150k before. Usage has halved so they need R75k to have enough for supply. They need to get the extra R25k from somewhere. So they could either increase the remaining users bills by 25% to get the R25k needed or make the grid tied solar users pay for the grid cost.
The issue with this is that it's not cost based. Someone using 100kWh a month isn't putting nearly the same strain on the infrastructure as someone using 1000kWh. The only component that's not shared is the line going from the street pole to the house and that's paid for by the property owner in any case. Shared infrastructure doesn't work the same way. Also if the users (and usage) halves then so does the capacity that needs to be catered for and maintenance and provisioning decrease as well. One can clearly see the figures Eskom use are thumbsuck to punish those self providing and not research based so Nersa was right to decline it.

The correct approach would be to charge a higher initial tariff (also not something crazy like R10/kWh) and then reduce this closer to production cost as usage increase. This takes care of the grid charge and maintenance for those using little power.
 
Liberate yourself for ever from the oppressive monopoly of Eksdom and their corrupt handlers in the current regime, by going completely OFF THE GRID!

They will forever loot and pillage for as long as they can get access to tax money!

Since I went OFFGRID (for 97% of the time) two years ago, I lack words to express my joy and satisfaction of not suffering the relentless harrassment of Eskom any longer.

Go offgrid ... because you CAN!
 
Liberate yourself for ever from the oppressive monopoly of Eksdom and their corrupt handlers in the current regime, by going completely OFF THE GRID!

They will forever loot and pillage for as long as they can get access to tax money!

Since I went OFFGRID (for 97% of the time) two years ago, I lack words to express my joy and satisfaction of not suffering the relentless harrassment of Eskom any longer.

Go offgrid ... because you CAN!
That makes no sense.
 
So you've basically got the same basic system as I have... even though my inverter is only 5kWh (it's a fanless Deye BTW)

It's hard to give someone else advice on this since we're all doing out own thing and have different requirements.
Also, keep in mind I live alone so it's easier to predict my patterns, I'm assuming it gets much harder with a family around... although, it shouldn't be that much different... I don't know, my mail-order bride got lost in the SAPOS system. Bless her heart.

That said, here's my current time slot config from Solar Assistant:
If you're not familiar with Solar Assistant or these time slots, the Power setting is just how much/fast I allow the battery to be charged from the grid, typical newer 5kWh LFP batteries can take 1C (meaning 5000 Watts charging) but it's typically better to stay below that if you can, the slower you charge it the longer it takes of course, but also improves the battery charge cycles in the long term and it's better to go lower if you can so you don't become a power sucking problem when the grid goes up again. The State of Charge percentage is what you want the battery level to be... meaning if it's below that it'll charge from the grid if the grid is available. If the battery is above that percentage nothing happens. It'll just keep charging for solar as normal if it's available.

View attachment 1647737

By the way it's probably not optimized, but that's 'cause it works for me right now so saving a buck here or there isn't at the top of my list.

Also, in regards to "losses", meaning times where the battery is full but I'm getting solar energy in, the inverter is hooked up to dump that energy into the geyser as long as the battery level is at or higher than the preferred charge state in the setting I've provided above. I'd assume yours is set up the same, if not, definitely look into that. You can identify an oversized system relatively easily this way, your battery will be full and your solar input will be almost nothing even when the sun is shining (or even if it's cloudy but you see almost no energy coming in). That's all wasted energy (that should have been fed back into the grid). Happens often on mine so that's how I know my system isn't optimized. But until feedback is a viable option I'm prioritizing availability because I work from home and haven't had an issue yet.

Summary:
Let's start after work at night, 9PM

Between 9PM and 1AM I allow the system to "quick charge" from the Grid to 65% if needed. That covers me if there's an outage during a time when there's no solar available and when I'm either asleep, drunk or just chilling in front of the TV, that keeps my fridge, night lights and security system running all night if needed. If the grid isn't available in that slot, well, then I use whatever the battery has to to give. I'd prefer this to be lower but with cable theft in the area it's better to charge if you can before the stealing starts (they usually steal between 1AM and 5AM).

Between 1AM and 7AM I allow the grid to keep the battery at 50% if the grid's available. If not then it's fine, there's enough to let the battery run down to just above it's recommended SOC, mine's set at 15% but 20% is usually the sweet spot with LFP batteries. I'd prefer the SOC to be lower, say 30-40%, but decided on 50% recently due to it being summer and cloudy. Will likely go down in Winter to my preferred setting of 30%.

Then, usually between 7AM and 9AM is when the sun starts doing its thing. I've adjusted it recently to keep the battery at 50% just because of the weather, but again like the time slot above, I'll take this setting down again when the weather becomes more predictable. This should typically have the lowest preferred SOC setting of the day since you really shouldn't need the grid to kick in at this point while you're waiting for that sweet-sweet solar energy.

From 9AM to 1PM I allow a slower grid charge to keep me at 40%, this is typically also too high since that's the perfect time slot for the batteries to be filled from solar, however I just keep it there now in case there's outages again, and also again, the weather. In Winter this slot will go down to 20-30%, easy 'cause I know the pack will charge fully from only Solar even if I'm using as many appliances as I can while the system is charging. (My max wattage on the panels is usually 2200 Watts between 12PM and 1PM)

Then from 1PM to 5PM I use grid again to keep the batteries at 85% if possible. This is typically too high as well BUT I keep it there for now sicne if the batteries (as the usually do) were charged fully during the 9AM to 1PM slot then it won't even use the grid, but if they aren't at 85% during this slot then something obviously went wrong (bad weather or outage) so this settings makes sense and works well for me. This is a very important timeslot. You want to go into dusk knowing you have energy. Even if you don't and the weather is crappy, then you can at least switch off some non-critical devices and even switch off the fridge etc. until the next morning to see what happens at dawn.

Then 5PM to 9PM I try to dump as much energy into the battery from grid again to keep it at 90% just in case there's an outage over night and bad weather the next day... however I think this setting is too high, I keep it because it gives me peace of mind.

Here's my usage for the past 12 Days.
As far as I'm concerned this is worst case scenario... so that's a good measuring stick.
The days where my solar vs. grid power is roughly 50/50 are the days where it's sunnier... the rest you can bet were cloudy days.

It's kind of obvious to me that if I wanted to go "off grid", I need to double my battery capacity and possibly double my panels too... so 10kWh battery storage with 8 X 550Watt panels... that's actually really not that bad. The only issue I have is space. But will figure that out somehow.

The first thing I would do is double my battery capacity, when monitoring the system throughout the day I'm noticing a lot of energy that doesn't have anywhere to go... I think that's where a lot of people get it wrong, they use general calculations to size the system so they add tons of panels but then don't realize that for hours at a time those panels are just idling and doing nothing, fine if you want to cater for cloudy days but you can also increase battery capacity for those situations (granted, panels are cheaper per watt so I'm likely wrong here. not really sure yet)

View attachment 1647785


Another hard-learned tip I would add for people with smaller solar systems is this: Solar PV voltage.
Dearlord, I literally doubled my PV efficiency and input by changing to slightly higher voltage panels. My previous 4 panels were just licking the bottom of the barrel on my inverter in regards to how much DC voltage it needed from the panels.... sure the the system was still working, but the MPPT controller was working overtime... Once I changed to 50V panels instead of 38V I literally doubled my PV input.
Don't forget you're measuring summer. You likely need 3x the number of panels, if not more.
 
Am I stupid, or are Eskom saying that the poor are paying to subsidize people installing solar? The poor paying R100 a month are subsiding the guy spending 250K of his own money to install solar?

Because if that is what they are saying them their brains have evaporated beyond repair
There's a fixed cost to Eskom to provide the grid infrastructure (the part of the network that the distribution side of Eskom owns) before they supply a single kWh of power. This cost needs to be distributed amongst all grid users and is currently included in the cost per kWh.

Everyone who has their own solar generation but is still connected to the grid expects to use the grid as backup when they don't have enough generation, so they should contribute for the upkeep of the grid even during the times they're not using it, as they will need to use it at some point. The only time this shouldn't apply is if someone is totally off-grid and has removed their connection from the grid.
 
Everyone who has their own solar generation but is still connected to the grid expects to use the grid as backup when they don't have enough generation, so they should contribute for the upkeep of the grid even during the times they're not using it, as they will need to use it at some point. The only time this shouldn't apply is if someone is totally off-grid and has removed their connection from the grid.

The issue I have is that the connection fees are totally out of wack because of inefficiency. I've seen first hand how 11kV step down transformers are not serviced for 20 years until they eventually leak all their oil out, blow up and then need to replaced at a massive cost. Also a cable develops a fault and three or four bakkie loads full of contractor teams stand around for 4 hours while two guys fix a cable.

There is so much inefficiency baked into the proposed fees that it's daylight robbery. I recon R2400 per annum (R200 per month) would be more than adequate if Eskom was forced to compete with other electricity providers instead of being protected.
 
Installing Solar but still keeping Eskom as a backup is as hypocritical as buying an EV but carrying a Gennie to charge it, just in case, or going Vegan, but buying food that tastes like meat, or dumping your chick because she no longer does it for you but still jerking off to pics of her.

Have the courage if your convictions.

Go off grid.
 
For starters and simplicity, I would be happy with a fair system that does this for now:

Export X kWh, write off your "connection" fee for that month, export Y KWh, credit with set fixed amount and so on.

Hell it'd be enough incentive for me to start looking at a second string and even double my storage.
 
That makes no sense.
True and I suspect Andre means still having a connection but not needing power for 97% of the time (or maybe 97% of his power requirements) so not getting involved any tariffs etc.
 
There's a fixed cost to Eskom to provide the grid infrastructure (the part of the network that the distribution side of Eskom owns) before they supply a single kWh of power. This cost needs to be distributed amongst all grid users and is currently included in the cost per kWh.

Everyone who has their own solar generation but is still connected to the grid expects to use the grid as backup when they don't have enough generation, so they should contribute for the upkeep of the grid even during the times they're not using it, as they will need to use it at some point. The only time this shouldn't apply is if someone is totally off-grid and has removed their connection from the grid.
That's not actually true. Except for the very last few meters, which was supplied by the house owner in any case, there's no extra cost to supply to a single user which is what the tariff is supposedly for. The grid distribution is directly proportional to how much is used overall starting from absolute zero for both. So if you don't use or use very little you don't really contribute to that cost just by being connected.

Eskom is double dipping by adding those costs to the cost per kWh and charging users for it directly. As with the electricity price we have no idea what the realistic value should be because it's state controlled and influenced by corruption and inefficiency but I bet the real cost is multiple times less than what they currently charge. Ekurhuleni charges R73.90 for a normal 80A connection so Eskom's proposed tariff is outrageous. All it would result in is more people going off-grid and using a neighbours connection for those occasions it's not sufficient.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter