wingnut771
Honorary Master
I wasn’t referring to the refueling but rather that there was still more work needed to complete the upgrade.Already did2 articles mention the refueling
I wasn’t referring to the refueling but rather that there was still more work needed to complete the upgrade.Already did2 articles mention the refueling
Even on fully overcast days my panels put out 50% of the power.Is it March 2025 that we are going to see n increase of 12.74%? How much does one unit power cost to generate with solar/generator because if the sun is missing like it has been for the last couple of days I guess a generator must charge the batteries.
Already did2 articles mention the refueling
I wasn’t referring to the refueling but rather that there was still more work needed to complete the upgrade.
Oh they don't actually require that for the lifespan extension, the core catcher can come later.I wasn’t referring to the refueling but rather that there was still more work needed to complete the upgrade.
I read the article. My first comment hasn’t changed.Once again, an issue that would have been easily resolved if you had actually read the article that you decided to comment on.
You're not the only one I've noticed who does this. Sign of the times I suppose. Shorter and shorter attention spans in the digital era.
Yeah it's never mentioned in that article.I read the article.
I read the article. My first comment hasn’t changed.
Yeah it's never mentioned in that article.
Not the core catcher, refueling and the pressure testing. That's not mentioned though the pressure testing is only mentioned by the energy "expert" Chris YellandUnit 1 is very clearly mentioned in the article. Are you guys reading something different to me?
Here is the quote:
'Koeberg Unit 1 was synchronised to the grid following similar work in November 2023. It subsequently secured an extension of its operational licence in July 2024. It can continue to operate until 2044.
“Unit 1, contributing 930MW to the grid, has shown exceptional reliability since its return to service,” said Eskom.'
In other words, unit 1 was completed first. Now unit 2 has as well. I really don't see what's so difficult to understand here.
Is that related to the life extension project?Not the core catcher, refueling and the pressure testing. That's not mentioned though the pressure testing is only mentioned by the energy "expert" Chris Yelland
Core catcher was supposed to be, but it's not a necessity so it's been put on hold.Is that related to the life extension project?
Not the core catcher, refueling and the pressure testing. That's not mentioned though the pressure testing is only mentioned by the energy "expert" Chris Yelland
Now you're being informed that unit 1 will more than likely be shut down soon. It's been running 412 daysYou're now referring to specific parts of the unit. The other poster as well your previous post said that unit 1 is not mentioned at all in the article when it is.
Now you're being informed that unit 1 will more than likely be shut down soon. It's been running 412 days
Spent fuel pools for ten years, dry storage casks on site after that.so what happens to all the spent nuclear fuel, where does that go?
does SA have a repository of nuclear fuel or does it get reprocessed and recycled?
better than our coal plants then.Even on fully overcast days my panels put out 50% of the power.
Only when it's pouring does it drop down to 25%.
I mean if we have to, it did no work for the whole of 2023Unit 2 is back in operation, can we, in the spirit of the new year allow unit 2 to bask in its 930MW magnificence and glory and just be happy for it instead of shifting the spotlight to unit 1?