Swa
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 4, 2012
- Messages
- 31,217
And here we have it. You keep going with this binary thinking mentality the more it's pointed out like a broken record.Let me go outside at this time right now, pretty sure that isn't the sun above my head.
You're also ignoring the costs of decommissioning solar and wind which has to be done in half the time of a nuclear you're also ignoring the fact costs of the supplementary power needed. What do you think that the solar panels are going to last forever? Also what happens at night when the sun doesn't shine? What happens when the wind doesn't blow enough? Like what's happened in the UK recently and even in South Australia? Magic? Is that how renewables will keep going?
Also you renewables always keep saying we can't keep putting the eggs into one basket we must mix, which also increases the costs as now you need more specialized people, equipment and so on.
Anti-renewable: "The sun doesn't shine a night."
"But what about the wind?"
Anti-renewable: "The wind doesn't blow that much during the day."
SA is actually one of the best places for renewables. We have sunshine for most of the year and at night the wind usually picks up. But whenever this is brought up we don't hear anything more and the same arguments are rehashed the next time. And no I haven't ignored the cost of deconstructing renewables but as I said you can hardly be serious in comparing that to getting rid of nuclear waste. The costs are so astronomical that no country includes it in their calculations and it's always a problem passed on for future generations.