Eskom warns it may have to shut down 16,000MW after pollution exemptions declined

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,217
Let me go outside at this time right now, pretty sure that isn't the sun above my head.
You're also ignoring the costs of decommissioning solar and wind which has to be done in half the time of a nuclear you're also ignoring the fact costs of the supplementary power needed. What do you think that the solar panels are going to last forever? Also what happens at night when the sun doesn't shine? What happens when the wind doesn't blow enough? Like what's happened in the UK recently and even in South Australia? Magic? Is that how renewables will keep going?
Also you renewables always keep saying we can't keep putting the eggs into one basket we must mix, which also increases the costs as now you need more specialized people, equipment and so on.
And here we have it. You keep going with this binary thinking mentality the more it's pointed out like a broken record.
Anti-renewable: "The sun doesn't shine a night."
"But what about the wind?"
Anti-renewable: "The wind doesn't blow that much during the day."

SA is actually one of the best places for renewables. We have sunshine for most of the year and at night the wind usually picks up. But whenever this is brought up we don't hear anything more and the same arguments are rehashed the next time. And no I haven't ignored the cost of deconstructing renewables but as I said you can hardly be serious in comparing that to getting rid of nuclear waste. The costs are so astronomical that no country includes it in their calculations and it's always a problem passed on for future generations.
 

The Trutherizer

Executive Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
8,263
Of course they'll get the exemption from the minister.
What are the odds Gwede will let a chance pass to set a regressive precedent for coal power.
There're still a bit of patronage money to squeeze out of the old coal station carcases after all.
 

neoprema

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
10,827
Massive load-shedding on the cards after Eskom is denied pollution exemptions

Eskom has warned that the refusal of its applications for pollution exemptions at several of its coal-fired power stations would have a "very significant impact" on its ability to provide electricity to the country.

"If implemented, the decision will result in an immediate shutting down of 16,000MW of installed coal-fired capacity," Eskom said in a statement on Tuesday.
Of course Eskom will hold us ransom now. If one thing Africa is good at its NOT PLANNING for anything. Tomorrow is another day, we must steal everything today. Then when tomorrow it all runs out we will blame someone else, usually colonialists.
 

mypetcow

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
845
1. We are not talking reliability. It's more expensive to maintain with longer maintenance times.
2. You're ignoring the issue. By backup power I actually mean regular additional power from neighbouring states. No country has gone just nuclear without importing power from other sources. It would dramatically increase the costs.
3. Again you don't understand. Of all sources of electricity nuclear is the least dispatchable. So you have to provision for constantly providing peak power.
It’s okay. Don’t worry about it. You keep moving the goal posts from post to post to suit your narrative which is really sad. You do have good points. Maybe check out one of those Coursera electrical engineering courses focusing on power engineering over the Christmas break if you have time…or check out Wikipedia. There are quite a few good resources covering these topics…
 

Oldfut

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
2,340
My Zim 2c is that it highlights Eskom's gross incompetence (at best) and blatant refusal to abide by the law; let a small legitimate business try that and it would be fined and closed overnight. The other note is that the pollution control setup is almost, maybe more so, sophisticated than the actual operation, particularly as regards operation and maintenance. Power generation is the proverbial "bonfire in a box" but the emissions cleanup is complicated and specialised; way out of Eskom's current expertise league I would guess.
 

PaulMurkin

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
3,455
FYI, my reliable source... who has been right on the money told us this morning that we're going to be hit hard in January... Eskom's going to go full on ram it up your poophole crazy
 

Gordon_R

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
20,817
FYI, my reliable source... who has been right on the money told us this morning that we're going to be hit hard in January... Eskom's going to go full on ram it up your poophole crazy

New thread, they've upped the ante:
 

hawker

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
11,461
FYI, my reliable source... who has been right on the money told us this morning that we're going to be hit hard in January... Eskom's going to go full on ram it up your poophole crazy
I mean if you look at the numbers we should be in like permanent Stage1/Stage2
 

HumanShield

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
913
So quite literally their current generating capacity? They've been running the country on less than half of their installed capacity.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,982
So quite literally their current generating capacity? They've been running the country on less than half of their installed capacity.
Actually from the list it's basically the list of those that have been giving issues anyway, they tend to not tell us that 8GW is never ever coming back online and that we have the constant 8GW down for unplanned maintenance or more.
 

PaulMurkin

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
3,455
New thread, they've upped the ante:
Indeed they have, I see it as a purge, and its fine really, this will push my employer to close up shop here and move us overseas- win-win for me, with an immigration application in process too
 

PaulMurkin

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
3,455
So quite literally their current generating capacity? They've been running the country on less than half of their installed capacity.
Like I said, the number of "unplanned" on their Twitter "letters" has not changed much since 2019 when I began to check it..
 

richjdavies

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
2,100
Realistically what stops Eskom from starting to build more power stations?
Nope... Competence... They have spent 10 years failing to properly build Medupi and Kusile then managed to blow apart one of them!

Eskom CANNOT build power stations.

In the same time IPPs and thousands of cogen suppliers have built thousands of MW without a cent of public money.
 

Sinbad

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
81,152
Nope... Competence... They have spent 10 years failing to properly build Medupi and Kusile then managed to blow apart one of them!

Eskom CANNOT build power stations any more

In the same time IPPs and thousands of cogen suppliers have built thousands of MW without a cent of public money.
FTFY.
They used to be the best in the world at that.
 

Lupus

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
50,982
FTFY.
They used to be the best in the world at that.
Were they? Were they really? I mean the De Villiers commision in the 80s wasn't thrown together cause Escom/Evkom was performing well in the 80s.
 
Top