Grant
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
- Messages
- 60,621
Of course.Ahh “rectal cancer”…. It’s because it’s pride month…. Makes sense now!
How astute of you.
Of course.Ahh “rectal cancer”…. It’s because it’s pride month…. Makes sense now!
Cos that requires them to actually pay attention to logic and stuff and that is not their strong point.The pharmaceutical company that discovers something like a widespread cure for cancer (not really possible but hey lets keep it simple) will effectively make their competitors products obsolete. They'll make so much money relative to their competitors they'll end up eating them in the end.
People will always get cancer. That's not going to change. You will have a market for your cure until the end of time. If you have the only drug in the world that addresses it effectively you've basically won.
Why this escapes the average Big Pharma conspiracy nut I'll never understand.
Ha ha.
You need a bigger hat.
The most significant cardiovascular risk for transgender women is the prothrombotic effect (increased blood clotting) of estrogens. This manifests most significantly as an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE): deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), which occurs when blood clots from DVT break off and migrate to the lungs. Symptoms of DVT include pain or swelling of one leg, especially the calf. Symptoms of PE include chest pain, shortness of breath, fainting, and heart palpitations, sometimes without leg pain or swelling.
We don't even need that as trannies just off themselves when they realise that all the medical treatments in the world will still never make them a real woman.However the solution you your problem - ABORT THEM
lol wutIt’s an article from the nypost…
Pathetic.Pfft. We all know Ivermectin solves all problems. From virus to bacteria to cancer.
Big Pharma is hiding this fact. Follow the money peeps.
/s /S /s /S /s
Pathetic.
Don't mind him - he's talking outta his arse!Of course.
How astute of you.
As usual you miss the point.From the horses mouth:
Hormone Therapy: $1,500/Year
Gender Reassignment Surgery: $30,000-Plus
Facial Feminization Surgery: $25,000-$60,000
Breast Augmentation: $5,000-$10,000
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/transgender-operations-hormone-therapy-costs
And that is just the "desired" qualities. Then we have the entirely preventable medical risks that these "treatments" cause:
We don't even need that as trannies just off themselves when they realise that all the medical treatments in the world will still never make them a real woman.
Why do you think big pharma and their unknowing progressive allies are so hellbent on grooming children into transgenderism?
Convince healthy children that they are deformed and need hormonal medication and antidepressants for the rest of their life. Which all have delicious side effects like bone loss and endocrine diseases
There's more money in treatment than cure. The pharma co. who discover a cure for cancer would have a short to medium gain in their stock which would probably make shareholders very healthy, but in the long run they'll make less money. I think capitalism as a system isn't really grounded on the good of anyone but the profiteers. That's the system.The pharmaceutical company that discovers something like a widespread cure for cancer (not really possible but hey lets keep it simple) will effectively make their competitors products obsolete. They'll make so much money relative to their competitors they'll end up eating them in the end.
People will always get cancer. That's not going to change. You will have a market for your cure until the end of time. If you have the only drug in the world that addresses it effectively you've basically won.
Why this escapes the average Big Pharma conspiracy nut I'll never understand.
yeah, lot of people dye due to hair loss. They need to find some solution pronto.Cure for cancer but no cure for hair loss? Ridiculous.
yeah, lot of people dye due to hair loss. They need to find some solution pronto.
I doubt that's the case when the cure trumps treatment and you're the only game in town.There's more money in treatment than cure.
True. All it would take is some up and comer willing to manufacture it and they ruin the Big Pharma boys.The pharma co. who discover a cure for cancer would have a short to medium gain in their stock which would probably make shareholders very healthy, but in the long run they'll make less money. I think capitalism as a system isn't really grounded on the good of anyone but the profiteers. That's the system.
In reality however, it'll be near impossible to keep a cure under wrap. It would inevitably leak - I am not sure how much money is spent on finding a cure over what they spend finding treatments. I think government and other funders being involved is good though the best minds would still gravitate toward the big money.
yeah, lot of people dye due to hair loss. They need to find some solution pronto.
Keeps.Cure for cancer but no cure for hair loss? Ridiculous.