Evolution From The Last Universal Common Ancestor

Phronesis

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
3,675
A thread to discuss the evolution of life from the Last Univesral Common Ancestor (LUCA).

Current evidence suggest that the LUCA emerged about 3.5 to 3.8 billion years ago (bya) (perhaps even earlier 4 bya). The features of these organisms, as suggested by the evidence, are quite interesting.
They include:
1) A superbly optimal genetic code with the following features:
  • A) No better codes out of a million biosynthetically restricted codes. (Freeland et al., 2000)
  • B) The actual code is far better than other possible codes in minimizing the number of amino acids incorporated until translation is interrupted after a frameshift error occurred. (Itzkovitz and Alon, 2007)
  • C) The code is highly optimal for encoding arbitrary additional information, i.e., information other than the amino acid sequence in protein-coding sequences. (Itzkovitz and Alon, 2007)
  • D) The genetic code is generally regarded as the biological element least capable of evolving (Vetsigian et al.,2006)
  • E) Out of all possible codes (not only biosynthetically restricted codes), the genetic code is partially optimal with regards to error minimization. The analysis only included a subset of the possible "optimality features" of the code.(Novozhilov et al., 2007)
  • F) Massey (2008) found that ten thousand random codes have an average Error Minimization value of 74.5, and only 0.03% of these have equal or greater optimality than the Standard Genetic Code. He suggests that selection is at best only partly responsible for the property of error minimization.
  • G) Biro (2008) have shown that the properties of the code allow it to maintain its own functional integrity.
  • H) The code has the following mathematical properties (Gonzalez, 2004): Parity coding, Palindromic symmetry, Binary coding, Error-correction mechanism based on parity checking
  • I) Gilis et al., (2001) have shown that with regards to minimizing the consequences of translation errors on the 3D structure and stability of proteins, only two random codes in a billion are fitter than the natural code.

2) Biomolecular machine apparatus (some here) for the following processes (from: A minimal estimate for the gene content of the last universal common ancestor—exobiology from a terrestrial perspective):
A) Replication related machinery including;
  • DNA polymerase
  • Excinuclease ABC
  • DNA gyrase
  • Topoisomerase
  • NADdependent DNA ligase
  • DNA helicases
  • DNA mismatch repair MutS and MutT
  • Endonucleases
  • RecA
  • Chromosome segregation SMC
  • Methyltransferase (Epigenetics related enzyme)
  • Methyladenine glycosylase and adenine glycosylase
  • Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase
  • Deoxyribodipyrimidine photolyase
  • Integrase
  • HAM1 Sir2 (involved invarious aspects of genomic stability and known to play a role in inducing variability)
  • TatD—a recently discovered DNase
  • Histone deacetylase (More epigentically related enzymes)

B) Transcription/regulation
C) Translation/ribosome
D) RNA processing
E) Quality control processes (e.g. cell division control)
F) Transport/membrane
G) Electron transport
H) Metabolism
I) And several with unknown function (unknown function does not imply junk DNA though)

3) Spatial cell biology suggest that bacteria employ various "intricate and dynamic three dimensional organization that is central to their capacity to grow and divide". Bacteria are the simplest organisms that probably most resemble the state of the LUCA.

4) These organisms likely communicated like bacteria do:
'Rosetta Stone' Of Bacterial Communication Discovered

So we have abiogenesis processes that converged into a population of organisms known as the LUCA with the following properties (Figures 1 and 2):
1) Universal and very optimal genetic code
2) Quality control mechanisms and variation inducers
3) Replication machinery as well as several other molecular machine complexes crucial for survival.
4) Cell signaling mechanisms and controlled communication

picture.php

Figure 1: Doolittle's tree of life and abiogenesis.

picture.php

Figure 2: Convergence of abiogenesis processes into the LUCA. (bigger version)​

From there onwards, the evolution of life looks something like this:
picture.php

Figure 3: Tree of life (Adapted from discoverlife.org)​

With repeated emergence of several interesting structures... such as the eye, echolocation, carbonic anhydrase etc.

Feel free to add more interesting information.
 
Last edited:

Techne

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
12,851
Viruses plays a crucial role in evolution. About 8-10% of our (homo sapiens) genome consists of retroviral elements (viruses that insert their genomes into ours and then we pass it on) and they have many crucial functions, some even related to reproduction. They also play role in marine evolution:
World's Largest, Most Complex Marine Virus Is Major Player in Ocean Ecosystems

ScienceDaily (Oct. 31, 2010) — UBC researchers have identified the world's largest marine virus--an unusually complex 'mimi-like virus' that infects an ecologically important and widespread planktonic predator.

Cafeteria roenbergensis virus has a genome larger than those found in some cellular organisms, and boasts genetic complexity that blurs the distinction between "non-living" and "living" entities.

"Virus are classically thought of small, simple organisms in terms of the number of genes they carry," says UBC professor Curtis Suttle, an expert in marine microbiology and environmental virology and lead author of the study.

"Much of the genetic machinery we found in this virus you would only expect to find in living, cellular organisms, including many genes required to produce DNA, RNA, proteins and sugars."

The findings are reported in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Viruses cannot replicate outside of living host cells and they depend on proteins provided by the cell, a boundary that is often used to delineate "non-living" from "living" organisms. Giant viruses challenge this definition, as they still need a cell to replicate, but encode in their own genome most of the proteins required for replication.

Discovered in Texas coastal waters in the early 1990s, Curtis and his team where able to determine that the pathogen's genome contains approximately 730,000 base pairs. That makes Cafeteria roenbergensis virus the largest known marine virus, and the second largest known virus, after the fresh water-borne Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus, which weighs in at 1.2 million base pairs.

Cafeteria roenbergensis virus also infects a major marine zooplankter which occupies a key position in marine food webs.

"Even though predation by these marine plankton grazers is a major pathway of carbon transfer and nutrient recycling in marine and freshwater systems, we know next to nothing about the role viruses play in this system," notes Curtis, cross appointed to the departments of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Botany, and Microbiology and Immunology.

"There's little doubt that this virus is just one representative from a major group of largely unknown but ecologically important marine giant viruses."

Also on the research team were UBC graduate student Matthias Fischer, Michael Allen of the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, United Kingdom, and William Wilson of the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, United States.

Funding for the research was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Tula Foundation through the UBC Centre for Microbial Diversity and Evolution.
What a name for a virus :p.

The origin of viruses are still largely unknown, and probably will remain so as a result of their size and lack of enduring long periods of time.
A good start for those interested in viruses;
http://www.mcb.uct.ac.za/tutorial/virorig.html
 

Jola

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
20,124
Very impressive - wish that I knew more about this - maybe some day when I retire ?
 
Top