EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
No, I got your point. You're just completely wrong. Weinstein and Cosby are prime examples of men who got away with abuse for years. It was covered up by those around them and in Cosby's case the first allegations go back to 1969. He was only convicted in 2018 - nearly 50 years after. We just let this disgusting predator carry on his behaviour because we couldn't stand the thought that America's dad could do anything bad, because in our minds his public persona and real personality are indistinguishable.

What has that got to do with public opinion? Who here is saying that Weinstein and Cosby are innocent? Without any kind of televised trial?

You actually believe everyone here thought JD was innocent from day 1? Hell no. I was just as shocked as everyone else when it turned out that Amber is a narcissistic psychopath.

You do know that Bill Cosby is not currently in prison? He got released on a technicality because a prosecutor gave him immunity, your point is rubbish. The idea that everyone just assumed he was guilty is ludicrous.

I'm confused. You seem to agree with Cerebus that televising trials is a miscarriage of justice (for some mysterious reason) yet you are pointing out how actual miscarriage of justice takes place hidden behind closed doors and outside of public knowledge and scrutiny.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Not even MM’s girlfriend believes AH.

Evan Rachel-Wood? I think it's more that she's also frightened of the rabid online stans going after her.

6iumbl5ssuc91.png


Anyway she's got her own trial coming and I wish her the best too. I have sympathy for anyone coming out against abuse after what happened to Amber Heard.
 

Cray

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
34,549
I'm confused. You seem to agree with Cerebus that televising trials is a miscarriage of justice (for some mysterious reason)
I specifically stated...

That's a terrible example, Cosby and Weinstein got away with their crimes for years because they were very powerful men in their industry and their victims were afraid to come forward. Especially Cosby with his oh-so-wholesome reputation.

I don't agree/disagree but citing Cosby and Weinstein is not a great way to make your point.

yet you are pointing out how actual miscarriage of justice takes place hidden behind closed doors and outside of public knowledge and scrutiny.
I was simply pointing out a silly comparison.

The Cosby bollocks didn't happen at trial, it happened when he made a deal with the prosecutor, same as with Weinstein. Television would have made no difference to those outcomes.

I don't agree that televising trials automatically makes them a miscarriage, I also don't think that all trials should be televised, I have no issue with the current rules where each trial is evaluated for television based on the merits, I do however think that any trial with massive media exposure should have sequestered juries.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
I'm confused. You seem to agree with Cerebus that televising trials is a miscarriage of justice (for some mysterious reason) yet you are pointing out how actual miscarriage of justice takes place hidden behind closed doors and outside of public knowledge and scrutiny.

I didn't say that televising all trials is a miscarriage. But this trial should never have been televised. Just step back for a hot second and imagine that Amber wasn't lying. I know she's a narcissistic abuser and it's impossible for her to be telling the truth, but just imagine if she was actually recounting events that happened to her.

Now think about the way the public response to her accounts will have affected her. She had to recount moments of horrific sexual assault, and have her physical revulsion at the memories memefied and jeered at. Now think about how other victims of sexual assault will have felt about the public response to her account, how triggering it would have been. You seem to have lost all perspective on the fact that there's a whole other world of survivors of assault out there watching what's happened with this trial and deciding how they should go ahead with their lives.

The domestic violence expert in the NBC documentary made a good point about this:

 

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,118
I didn't say that televising all trials is a miscarriage. But this trial should never have been televised. Just step back for a hot second and imagine that Amber wasn't lying. I know she's a narcissistic abuser and it's impossible for her to be telling the truth, but just imagine if she was actually recounting events that happened to her.

Now think about the way the public response to her accounts will have affected her. She had to recount moments of horrific sexual assault, and have her physical revulsion at the memories memefied and jeered at. Now think about how other victims of sexual assault will have felt about the public response to her account, how triggering it would have been. You seem to have lost all perspective on the fact that there's a whole other world of survivors of assault out there watching what's happened with this trial and deciding how they should go ahead with their lives.

The domestic violence expert in the NBC documentary made a good point about this:

Every single one of them would be sickened by Amber Heard lying about something that happened to them.

And again to trigger you and every other progressive: if you are abused by someone, go to the damn police.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
I didn't say that televising all trials is a miscarriage. But this trial should never have been televised. Just step back for a hot second and imagine that Amber wasn't lying. I know she's a narcissistic abuser and it's impossible for her to be telling the truth, but just imagine if she was actually recounting events that happened to her.

Now think about the way the public response to her accounts will have affected her. She had to recount moments of horrific sexual assault, and have her physical revulsion at the memories memefied and jeered at. Now think about how other victims of sexual assault will have felt about the public response to her account, how triggering it would have been. You seem to have lost all perspective on the fact that there's a whole other world of survivors of assault out there watching what's happened with this trial and deciding how they should go ahead with their lives.

The domestic violence expert in the NBC documentary made a good point about this:


Funny that you dismiss the actual trial and instead link to an NBC production. The same NBC that was caught editing out Amber's Freudian slip from their interview:

 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Every single one of them would be sickened by Amber Heard lying about something that happened to them.

And again to trigger you and every other progressive: if you are abused by someone, go to the damn police.

Konfab telling abuse victims how they should feel:

FYCTF_KWIAQJ2le
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
Konfab telling abuse victims how they should feel:

FYCTF_KWIAQJ2le

Except there's thousands of comments on youtube, twitter, facebook, instagram and news articles around the world made by actual abuse victims speaking out against Amber and expressing utter disgust at her blatant lies and the fact that she is trying to piggyback off real abuse victims for her own personal gain.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Except there's thousands of comments on youtube, twitter, facebook, instagram and news articles around the world made by actual abuse victims speaking out against Amber and expressing utter disgust at her blatant lies and the fact that she is trying to piggyback off real abuse victims for her own personal gain.

I'm happy for them. It's nice that Amber can be useful for victims as well as abusers.
 

G'Wobblez

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
1,823
Just a reminder what a liar Heard is.


More karma incoming.


And here is her personality disorders coming through where she tries to blame Depp:

No no. You got it wrong. Johnny apologized so he is the guilty one… just like when he apologized to AH when she abused him..
Cause never in the history of being a victim of DV has a victim apologized to make things better.

But lets be hypocrites and only woman can be victims, like AH’s expert testified
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Perfect example of how abuse victims talk to their abusive husbands, hey @Cerberus? o_O

Lol what? Y'all obsessing over some incorrect paperwork to prove that Amber is a psychopath. Meanwhile Depp just paid off his colleague for battering him while drunk on set, you know, just like Amber said he did to her, only behind the scenes and for years. So victimly of him.

The hoops you all will jump through because you refuse to believe that the simplest narrative is also the most likely one; it boggles my mind. But sure, she faked bruises and lied to her parents and therapists, and staged scenes where they frankly discussed his abuse, and roped in witnesses, and recorded him howling drunk while he claimed he was asleep in an airplane toilet, and smashing furniture and yelling at her and throwing her phone, and got his underlings to apologize for him kicking her, and stole his iPhone to fake rapey messages after they were divorced, all while secretly abusing him without him presenting a shred of evidence to make a credible case for being a victim of abuse. Sure. It all fits when you think about how much you can't stand Amber.
 
Last edited:

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
Lol what? Y'all obsessing over some incorrect paperwork to prove that Amber is a psychopath. Meanwhile Depp just paid off his colleague for battering him while drunk on set, you know, just like Amber said he did to her, only behind the scenes and for years. So victimly of him.

The hoops you all will jump through because you refuse to believe that the simplest narrative is also the most likely one; it boggles my mind. But sure, she faked bruises and lied to her parents and therapists, and staged scenes where they frankly discussed his abuse, and roped in witnesses, and recorded him howling drunk while he claimed he was asleep in an airplane toilet, and smashing furniture and yelling at her and throwing her phone, and got his underlings to apologize for him kicking her, and stole his iPhone to fake rapey messages after they were divorced, all while secretly abusing him without him presenting a shred of evidence to make a credible case for being a victim of abuse. Sure. It all fits when you think about how much you can't stand Amber.

Maybe listen to the audio recording that I quoted instead of going on some tangent rant? :ROFL:

Amber Heard, the "victim of savage violent abuse who is scared for her life" gets right up in Depp's face (you can hear the footsteps) and tells him to "go suck my fking dick you fking cowardice ball-less piece of siht".

Followed by "you think I want anything to fking do with you? You think I want that fking old ass fking piece of siht? Fck you. You're a fking joke, man. And you're an embarrassment that I even came here and wasted my time trying to get you back." "Oooohh, what do you wanna say....? What do you wanna say?"

Now that you know what I'm talking about, do you think this is common in abusive relationships? For the victim to taunt and insult the abuser like that? To belittle the very person they are so frightened of? The person who at any moment might start punching them bloody without any provocation? With such fearless confidence?

And do you think it makes sense that an abusive husband who regularly beats his wife to a pulp and rapes her with broken bottles would have such a non-violent response to that?

This recording shows exactly what their relationship was like and it isn't one where Amber is scared for her life and Depp is a violent maniac.

Hell, if someone talked to me that way I would stand up, point to the door and tell them to get the fck out of my house in a very loud voice while walking toward them. Depp is acting in the most chilled way a person could possibly act in that situation.

Amber on the other hand is anything but chilled and my guess is that that is the kind of behavior that escalates to the point where she is punching him.
Physical abuse is always preceded by verbal abuse. And the fact is that Amber is the one being verbally abusive, here and in other recordings.
 
Last edited:

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
Hell, if someone talked to me that way I would stand up, point to the door and tell them to get the fck out of my house in a very loud voice while walking toward them. Depp is acting in the most chilled way a person could possibly act in that situation.

Who did the recording? If it was Depp it would make sense he's so chilled as he'd want her to continue on for the recording.

The recording sounds like she's provoking him to act violently, which is not normal for abuse victims.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Who did the recording? If it was Depp it would make sense he's so chilled as he'd want her to continue on for the recording.

The recording sounds like she's provoking him to act violently, which is not normal for abuse victims.

Maybe listen to the audio recording that I quoted instead of going on some tangent rant? :ROFL:

Amber Heard, the "victim of savage violent abuse who is scared for her life" gets right up in Depp's face (you can hear the footsteps) and tells him to "go suck my fking dick you fking cowardice ball-less piece of siht".

Followed by "you think I want anything to fking do with you? You think I want that fking old ass fking piece of siht? Fck you. You're a fking joke, man. And you're an embarrassment that I even came here and wasted my time trying to get you back." "Oooohh, what do you wanna say....? What do you wanna say?"

Now that you know what I'm talking about, do you think this is common in abusive relationships? For the victim to taunt and insult the abuser like that? To belittle the very person they are so frightened of? The person who at any moment might start punching them bloody without any provocation? With such fearless confidence?

And do you think it makes sense that an abusive husband who regularly beats his wife to a pulp and rapes her with broken bottles would have such a non-violent response to that?

This recording shows exactly what their relationship was like and it isn't one where Amber is scared for her life and Depp is a violent maniac.

Hell, if someone talked to me that way I would stand up, point to the door and tell them to get the fck out of my house in a very loud voice while walking toward them. Depp is acting in the most chilled way a person could possibly act in that situation.

Amber on the other hand is anything but chilled and my guess is that that is the kind of behavior that escalates to the point where she is punching him.
Physical abuse is always preceded by verbal abuse. And the fact is that Amber is the one being verbally abusive, here and in other recordings.

Yeah you know she's just not a very good victim is she? She calls him out on his bullshit, she fights back, sometimes she even starts fights. And sometimes when he's sober he also talks back to her calmly. But sometimes when he's drunk or high, he destroys apartments and scrawls obscene fantasies about her sleeping with her co-stars on the walls, and his fingertip gets cut off in circumstances nobody can seem to explain adequately. Sometimes he goes on a rampage in an airplane and howls like a gibbon monkey and has to apologize to everyone around him the day after and send his minions to beg Amber to stay with him.

All you're doing is regurgitating the same tired old myths about abuse that have been debunked a million times by experts in domestic violence, but still keep getting dragged up and used to defend abusers. And as long as you keep believing it, it's going to keep happening. The backlash against Evan Rachel-Wood has already started online, being pushed by exactly the same people that spearheaded the campaign against Amber.



I'm just waiting for you all to jump on the bandwagon to defend Manson against his own, multiple, credible accusations of abuse.

Domestic violence usually has a pretty simple narrative. And fighting back against someone who is abusive is not itself a form or a proof of abuse. Victims are allowed to fight back. They're even allowed to be bad people themselves; they can be slutty or dishonest or weak and pathetic or anything really. Abuse is multivariate. That's why it's disheartening to see so many victims siding with Depp because they don't think Amber's form of abuse is like theirs. And it's disheartening to see Evan try to distance herself from Amber Heard because she's scared of facing online retribution. Because they're coming for her just the same.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,104
Yeah you know she's just not a very good victim is she? She calls him out on his bullshit, she fights back, sometimes she even starts fights.
So when she attacks him and he defends himself, she is the victim. Got it. o_O

And sometimes when he's sober he also talks back to her calmly. But sometimes when he's drunk or high, he destroys apartments and scrawls obscene fantasies about her sleeping with her co-stars on the walls, and his fingertip gets cut off in circumstances nobody can seem to explain adequately. Sometimes he goes on a rampage in an airplane and howls like a gibbon monkey and has to apologize to everyone around him the day after and send his minions to beg Amber to stay with him.
Exactly. This shows that he would rather take out his anger at inanimate objects and by expressing it through screaming, and that he does not take it out on Amber.

All you're doing is regurgitating the same tired old myths about abuse that have been debunked a million times by experts in domestic violence, but still keep getting dragged up and used to defend abusers. And as long as you keep believing it, it's going to keep happening.
In all of the recordings we never hear Depp verbally abusing Heard while she just sits there and takes it.
What we do hear is Heard verbally abusing Depp while he just sits there and takes it.

Like I said, physical abuse comes after verbal abuse and we don't even see Depp abusing Amber verbally.

Out of all the recordings we would expect at least one where Amber is crying and Depp is being abusive, either verbally or physically, but we don't.


The backlash against Evan Rachel-Wood has already started online, being pushed by exactly the same people that spearheaded the campaign against Amber.



I'm just waiting for you all to jump on the bandwagon to defend Manson against his own, multiple, credible accusations of abuse.
Make another thread for this.

Domestic violence usually has a pretty simple narrative. And fighting back against someone who is abusive is not itself a form or a proof of abuse. Victims are allowed to fight back.
But she's not "fighting back", she's attacking him.

Show me one piece of evidence where Depp is getting in Amber's face and she is trying to escape the situation.
It's always Amber who is in Depp's face and he is always the one that is trying to escape. She even mocks him for it on tape.

They're even allowed to be bad people themselves; they can be slutty or dishonest or weak and pathetic or anything really.
If they are dishonest about being abused then they are not victims of abuse, they are victims of mental problems, as we have seen doctors testify about Amber.

Abuse is multivariate. That's why it's disheartening to see so many victims siding with Depp because they don't think Amber's form of abuse is like theirs.
You mean how someone who actually got punched in the face countless times and subsequently spent days in hospital and weeks recovering at home thinks that that is different to Amber who only says the got punched in the face countless times, yet didn't have a scratch on her?

Yeah I would say those "forms of abuse" are in fact different.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
So when she attacks him and he defends himself, she is the victim. Got it. o_O

I didn't say that did I? I said her standing up for herself does not invalidate the fact that she's a victim.

Exactly. This shows that he would rather take out his anger at inanimate objects and by expressing it through screaming, and that he does not take it out on Amber.


In all of the recordings we never hear Depp verbally abusing Heard while she just sits there and takes it.
What we do hear is Heard verbally abusing Depp while he just sits there and takes it.

Firstly if you really believe that Depp in a drunken blackout destroyed an apartment while screaming at Amber and painting obscenities on the wall just so that he didn't have to actually touch her, you are an idiot.

But even if you can believe that, that level of behavior on its own is abusive. Blacking out drunk and destroying your wife's apartment is abuse.

Like I said, physical abuse comes after verbal abuse and we don't even see Depp abusing Amber verbally.

We see plenty of Depp abusing her verbally. Pull the other one will you?


Out of all the recordings we would expect at least one where Amber is crying and Depp is being abusive, either verbally or physically, but we don't.

Oh in fact we absolutely do have that. Here's Amber crying and begging Depp to stop drinking because it makes him violent and crazy, while Depp tells her that it's actually her who makes him like that.


Blaming the other partner for making you act violently? That's abusive.

Make another thread for this.


But she's not "fighting back", she's attacking him.

Show me one piece of evidence where Depp is getting in Amber's face and she is trying to escape the situation.
It's always Amber who is in Depp's face and he is always the one that is trying to escape. She even mocks him for it on tape.

Sure here you go. Depp is clearly getting in Amber's face and she is clearly scared of him which is why she's recording him. Then when he sees her recording him he grabs her phone and throws it against the wall. That in itself is abusive behavior.


If they are dishonest about being abused then they are not victims of abuse, they are victims of mental problems, as we have seen doctors testify about Amber.

Even Dr Curry who somehow diagnosed Amber with BPD also diagnosed her with severe PTSD, which is consistent with years of abuse. Do you really believe looking at Depp that he's a victim of abuse? He has no evidence, no consistent narrative, and no indications that he's been traumatised at all.

You mean how someone who actually got punched in the face countless times and subsequently spent days in hospital and weeks recovering at home thinks that that is different to Amber who only says the got punched in the face countless times, yet didn't have a scratch on her?

Yeah I would say those "forms of abuse" are in fact different.

Oh look at you acknowledging that there are different forms of abuse. That's great, you're making progress. Your ignorance and prejudice on this matter is quite astonishing. True experts in domestic violence recognize the patterns of behavior and are behind Amber Heard.



https://twitter.com/k4mil1aa/status/1550926676300668928
 
Top