EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[HunterNW]

Unbelievable the amount of men who's stroking JD d!ck.

 

[UrBaN963]

"Quite a claim" is different from "a serious allegation". I think it's bizarre and doesn't have an ounce of evidence behind it.

Oh wait random youtube guy says there's artifacts from photoshop in there and we all know how credible random youtubers are.

Again, I have no opinion on the images. I haven't looked into it and don't have reason to assume they're fake so it's a non-issue for me.

 

[Howdy]

Unbelievable the amount of men who's stroking JD d!ck.

Nope, not JD's, much less Amber's. I'm crushing on team Vasquez and Curry ...

 

[cerebus]

Nope, not JD's, much less Amber's. I'm crushing on team Vasquez and Curry ...

They do make quite a team

 

[Howdy]

They do make quite a team

Not quite. They're missing a member.

 

[cerebus]

Not quite. They're missing a member.

Yeah Adam Waldman, now there's a scrummy bit of rat**** cheesecake hey

Who Is Adam Waldman? Lobbyist With Ties to Putin Testifying in Depp Trial

Attorney Adam Waldman has made headlines recently through his ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a possible leak of confidential information.

www.newsweek.com

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1527329111772782608

 

[G'Wobblez]

Who is the muffin man!

 

[G'Wobblez]

Stop trying to put the shyt back into the horse.

AH let it out.
It’s out.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Yeah Adam Waldman, now there's a scrummy bit of rat**** cheesecake hey

Who Is Adam Waldman? Lobbyist With Ties to Putin Testifying in Depp Trial

Attorney Adam Waldman has made headlines recently through his ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a possible leak of confidential information.

www.newsweek.com

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1527329111772782608

Oh no, Depp is a Putin supporter! He must have abused Amber badly then, and the whole court case was a sham!

 

[Howdy]

Stop trying to put the shyt back into the horse.

AH let it out.
It’s out.

I thought it was the poodle with an impossibly large doodle.

 

[Howdy]

Yeah Adam Waldman, now there's a scrummy bit of rat**** cheesecake hey

Wrong member

 

[cerebus]

Wrong member

Indeed

 

[G'Wobblez]

So they made friends during the trial?
Same person tweeting this as the person getting a witness kicked off the witness list with falsified information.

Now who will believe.
Fartlow?

 

[KleinBoontjie]

Oh no, Depp is a Putin supporter! He must have abused Amber badly then, and the whole court case was a sham!

Explains the Z tattoo, amaright?

 

[Howdy]

Indeed

Cleaning up after Amber's dog?

Speed bumps ahead.

 

[tetrasect]

You and I both know that those types of farmed content videos are HUGELY disproportionately favouring Depp. And they work on people like Emjay whose huge lawyerly intellect can't tell the difference between clickbait and reality. The irony of saying I'm the one who listens to videos like that is beyond me, honestly.

Yeah I meant the general quality of the content which is based purely on twitter/insta/facebook comments which seems to be your bread and butter in this thread.

 

[cerebus]

Yeah I meant the general quality of the content which is based purely on twitter/insta/facebook comments which seems to be your bread and butter in this thread.

What are you talking about? I'm trying to get credible information from firsthand records. Sorry if there isn't a lot of it that didn't come from a social media feed but that's just how it is. The information can't be found elsewhere. If you have better sources, post them. If you keep talking about how the trial disproved something, post where that happened.

 

[konfab]

What I'm suggesting is that if it comes to the expert opinion of Dr Curry versus Dawn Hughes since they are opposite, there are enough red flags in Dr Curry's assessment to give more weight to the latter.

- Dr Curry is nowhere near as qualified as Dr Hughes
- Dr Curry has an existing relationship with Vasquez that wasn't fully disclosed, and was "wined and dined" at Depp's home.
- Dr Curry isn't board certified whereas Dr Hughes is
- The depth of Dr Curry's evaluation was significantly less than Dr Hughes.

Pretty much none of that matters. Seriously, it doesn't matter. Heard's legal team didn't object to Curry being an expert witness on any of the grounds that you gave. Doing the qualifications-dick-measuring-contest isn't a legal argument, and doesn't really convince anyone considering experts on both sides are chosen to be favourable to their side.

What actually matters, is how they carry themselves during direct examination, and more importantly, during cross examination. Curry carried herself extremely well during cross examination. Hughes got ripped to shreds during cross examination. That speaks to volumes about her credibility more so than any of the things you are going on about.

Now to be fair, I think a big portion of this is probably because Heard's legal team is borderline incompetent when it comes to examining witnesses. During direct examination, her legal team repeatedly got hit with an objection by asking leading questions. During cross exam, they would ask the witness to speculate, and again was hit with an objection. Basic stuff like this can decimate the credibility of a witness.

 

[tetrasect]

Ok that's fair enough. Although personally I disagree that their relationship is immaterial. I think it's a glaring conflict of interest and a red flag.

Did you know that Dr Curry was taken out by Depp for dinner the day before she met with Amber?

Shock twist about witness at Depp trial

Psychologist who made bombshell claims about Amber Heard may not be a credible witness.

www.nzherald.co.nz

So much professionalism.

If you had watched the trial then this would be the last point you would try to make.

This is truly embarrassing.

 

[s0lar]

Come on guys. Amber and Johnny have moved on.

Perhaps you should too.