EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
Warner ATTACKS Johnny Depp! CLICK HERE NOW! WATCH THE ADS! I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK IN THE COMMENTS BELOW!

Oh, and wasn't the media evil, bad and vilified Amber? Wonder why the sudden change of heart... only one way to know... CLICK HERE NOW!
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
Oh yeah there's no doubt about it.
NBC's documentary was a good start:


Then Gayle King interviewed Camille and said Amber was vilified (7:28)

She also said this :D


And now HBO is strongly rumored to be reaching out to YouTubers for a documentary called "framing Amber Heard".
gykz0f2ts0e91.png


It already stinks and it's only going to get worse. I don't think anyone should be comfortable with the idea that a case involving domestic abuse where one person is going to be forced to recount moments of horrendous sexual abuse should ever be televised. Especially not when there's already a vociferous movement of people who believe her to be a liar from the outset.

Since you refuse to watch the trial I've gathered some more of your type of evidence for you:

167999-huisgenoot-cover-2016-june-2-issue.jpg




3.jpg




cover-of-the-july-27th-issuebc500d.jpg
 
Last edited:

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
It already stinks and it's only going to get worse. I don't think anyone should be comfortable with the idea that a case involving domestic abuse where one person is going to be forced to recount moments of horrendous sexual abuse should ever be televised. Especially not when there's already a vociferous movement of people who believe her to be a liar from the outset.

Well now, the unsealed documents now shows who let that cat out of the bag before the trial even started...
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
Oh, unsealed documents! More court documents to talk about!

Lol y'all wanted this to come out :laugh:

No photo manipulation by Heard

iwxhygllume91.jpg


z6t8tgllume91.jpg


But there was photo manipulation from Depp

aobqizwmgne91.png


2gb6gwqjgne91.png


Revenge porn

1g26yueldme91.png


Trying to insinuate that Heard killed someone in a car

vhfsrbqu7ne91.png



Well, that was worth the money I'm sure. Anyway I'm going on holiday this afternoon so I guess i'll be offline. Y'all gonna have to live without the pleasure of my company for a while.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
Lol y'all wanted this to come out :laugh:

No photo manipulation by Heard

iwxhygllume91.jpg


z6t8tgllume91.jpg


But there was photo manipulation from Depp

aobqizwmgne91.png


2gb6gwqjgne91.png
You obviously don't understand any of this if you think this exonerates Amber and incriminates Depp.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
Lmao. Alright then

This was in the trial. Metadata proves that it is not the original picture but it cannot prove that a picture has been edited.

What does prove that Amber's pictures were edited is the many different versions of the same picture with different levels of hue/saturation/contrast/exposure seemingly changed to make her "injury" stick out.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
This was in the trial. Metadata proves that it is not the original picture but it cannot prove that a picture has been edited.

What does prove that Amber's pictures were edited is the many different versions of the same picture with different levels of hue/saturation/contrast/exposure seemingly changed to make her "injury" stick out.

If those pics were edited they would have shown up on metadata. What's far more likely is that her iPhone saved an hdr copy of her images and she was confused when it was brought up by Camille.

Depp also submitted duplicate photos with different lighting applied. I could find it for you if I didn't already know how pointless it is to show you anything - but it's there in his evidence. It doesn't imply anything nefarious, it's just how iPhones work.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
If those pics were edited they would have shown up on metadata. What's far more likely is that her iPhone saved an hdr copy of her images and she was confused when it was brought up by Camille.

Depp also submitted duplicate photos with different lighting applied. I could find it for you if I didn't already know how pointless it is to show you anything - but it's there in his evidence. It doesn't imply anything nefarious, it's just how iPhones work.
What? That's a ridiculous explanation which makes no sense in the context of the evidence. Go watch the trial.

But OK Mr. digital forensics expert. Teach me more about how iPhones "automatically" take multiple pictures, send them to third party apps to get "automatically" edited, resized and go through a bruise colorization algorithm so that you end up with many different versions with completely different exif data, colors and sizes.
 

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
Revenge porn

That's a bit of stretch. He offered it up for evidence and they rightly went "lol, no." and I agree that those images have no place in this trial unless some of them show the bruises and abuse given.

Is that revenge porn? Very far from it.
 

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
Was watching this earlier but gave up because it was just incredibly boring.

If you do make it through the video, please let us in on the timestamps of the juicy bits, if there are any?

It was much to do about nothing. The most damning thing is that Elaine let it slip that Amber was sexually abused which resulted in it going public, and if she'd been a little better at her job she could have had the camera's off and the sexual abuse parts confidential and not in the public viewing.

So it comes out when Amber crys about how her abuse is on display, it's actually her own legal teams blunder and not Depp + Team's fault.

Otherwise, a while bunch of Lawyer nonsense going on. Seems like Elaine is either incompetent OR she like to break the rules to get a win.
 

G'Wobblez

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
1,823
Was watching this earlier but gave up because it was just incredibly boring.

If you do make it through the video, please let us in on the timestamps of the juicy bits, if there are any?
Made it halfway. Will attempt the last part later.
Nothing to write home about at this moment.
Nothing shattering the case.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
That's a bit of stretch. He offered it up for evidence and they rightly went "lol, no." and I agree that those images have no place in this trial unless some of them show the bruises and abuse given.

Is that revenge porn? Very far from it.

Yeah that was an attempt at revenge porn. Why else would they try to introduce it in the trial when it's completely irrelevant? The world needs to see more nudie pics of Amber so we know she's lying about abuse right?

The sad thing is if they'd been able to get them in, you all would have had no problem with it.

Anyway I can see you all scrambling desperately to make these documents seem less damaging to Depp than they clearly are. Just admit it was a huge self-own and get on with life.

Most of the time the obvious answer is the right one. Gone Girl isn't real you know.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
Yeah that was an attempt at revenge porn. Why else would they try to introduce it in the trial when it's completely irrelevant? The world needs to see more nudie pics of Amber so we know she's lying about abuse right?

The sad thing is if they'd been able to get them in, you all would have had no problem with it.

Anyway I can see you all scrambling desperately to make these documents seem less damaging to Depp than they clearly are. Just admit it was a huge self-own and get on with life.

Most of the time the obvious answer is the right one. Gone Girl isn't real you know.

Because if she took pictures of herself at a time when she claimed to have sustained injuries and the pictures show that there are no injuries then they can prove that she's lying.
 

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
Yeah that was an attempt at revenge porn. Why else would they try to introduce it in the trial when it's completely irrelevant? The world needs to see more nudie pics of Amber so we know she's lying about abuse right?

Anyway I can see you all scrambling desperately to make these documents seem less damaging to Depp than they clearly are. Just admit it was a huge self-own and get on with life.

Most of the time the obvious answer is the right one. Gone Girl isn't real you know.

Ah... so far you are the one who as been scrambling through it really... no-one else has really posted as much about it as you?
 

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
Because if she took pictures of herself at a time when she claimed to have sustained injuries and the pictures show that there are no injuries then they can prove that she's lying.

Yeah, "revenge porn" is such a metal jump to conclude too... it really does highlight Cerebus' mental state really.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
Because if she took pictures of herself at a time when she claimed to have sustained injuries and the pictures show that there are no injuries then they can prove that she's lying.

From the time before she even met Depp? Riiiiiiight
 
Top