EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[2023]

The Manson messages are so gross and creepy.



So this is the guy you’re going to bat for, really?

I don't really care about Manson. I'm finding the dodgy things Amber and her team did quiet entertaining though.

 

[cerebus]

I don't really care about Manson. I'm finding the dodgy things Amber and her team did quiet entertaining though.

Ok bubble boy

 

[2023]

Ok bubble boy

Oh shame, have you run out of unsealed documents to read through that support your case that you have to go fishing into Manson so that you can justify yourself defending the lying domestic abuser who stole millions from a children's home?

 

[lowriderza]

Nothing it’s just hilarious.

Here, dig in:

Unsealed Depp v. Heard Court Docs Reveal Shocking New Claims

More than 6,000 pages of docs were unsealed in the Depp v. Heard defamation saga, including Heard’s worry that Depp would use her nude pics and the exclusion of Marilyn Manson.

www.thedailybeast.com

Over the weekend, more than 6,000 pages of court documents in the Depp v. Heard trial were unsealed. The docs, which were viewed by The Daily Beast, shed new light on the case seen ‘round the world, providing new insights into either team’s legal strategy and the reams of evidence that were excluded. Ultimately, as you’ll see, the mountain of docs do not appear to reflect too well on Team Depp.


Though Depp’s team spent many hours of the trial trying to paint Heard as the abuser in the relationship, an unsealed motion by Depp’s team opposing a mental examination of Depp argued that the actor should not be subjected to an independent medical examination, “Because Mr. Depp Is Not Alleging Harm Based On A Specific Physical or Mental Injury.” Depp’s team further claimed that, “Mr. Depp does not allege a specific cause of action for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress; does not assert that Ms. Heard’s actions caused him a specific psychiatric injury; and does not claim that Ms. Heard’s actions caused him to experience unusually severe emotional distress.”

Ah yes. The article where the journalist claimed many people didn't testify and had to post an update correcting himself. He also would not have stated the above as it was resolved by different means.

 

[tetrasect]

So… Jonnie Darvo didn’t allege under oath that he was a victim of abuse? But here he tells the court that he isn’t alleging any abuse in order to avoid being investigated on his claims. Your boy committed perjury.

Huh? They never claimed she didn't assault him, they are saying he didn't suffer a psychiatric injury as a result. Do you understand the difference? Amber said that Depp's abuse caused her to have PTSD. Johnny never did that. So why would he need a psychiatrist to evaluate his non-existent claims of traumatic psychological injury?

Anyway keep spamming the thread with irrelevant nonsense that nobody cares about.

Wow. You call evidence of lies and deceit by Amber and her lawyers "irrelevant nonsense that nobody cares about" and then in your very next post you harp on about Marilyn Manson.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself.

 

[Lucas Buck]

So… Jonnie Darvo didn’t allege under oath that he was a victim of abuse? But here he tells the court that he isn’t alleging any abuse in order to avoid being investigated on his claims. Your boy committed perjury.

Anyway keep spamming the thread with irrelevant nonsense that nobody cares about.

There is no perjury here, so I'm not sure why you think that this is some kind of gotcha. Depp claimed harm based on defamation. He was not the one who claimed to have a diagnosed psychiatric disorder as a result of abuse, so why on earth would he have to be diagnosed.

 

[Emjay]

So… Jonnie Darvo didn’t allege under oath that he was a victim of abuse? But here he tells the court that he isn’t alleging any abuse in order to avoid being investigated on his claims. Your boy committed perjury.

Anyway keep spamming the thread with irrelevant nonsense that nobody cares about.

You are the only one who does not care about the truth.

 

[Emjay]

cerebus linking Daily Beast is just so on brand...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1553842176236437505

 

[cerebus]

Oh shame, have you run out of unsealed documents to read through that support your case that you have to go fishing into Manson so that you can justify yourself defending the lying domestic abuser who stole millions from a children's home?

Oh I’m just enjoying my holiday.

 

[Emjay]

No substance. All show.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1553644780340518914

 

[konfab]

The Manson messages are so gross and creepy.

So this is the guy you’re going to bat for, really?

So you think being a degenerate should automatically make you guilty of a crime if you are accused of said crime?

Well ok

 

[2023]

No substance. All show.

So the allegations were allowed to be public viewed, but the actual evidence for/against it would not be viewed by the public?

Interesting considering Elaine leaked the allegations to start with.

 

[konfab]

Nothing it’s just hilarious.

Here, dig in:

Unsealed Depp v. Heard Court Docs Reveal Shocking New Claims

More than 6,000 pages of docs were unsealed in the Depp v. Heard defamation saga, including Heard’s worry that Depp would use her nude pics and the exclusion of Marilyn Manson.

www.thedailybeast.com

Over the weekend, more than 6,000 pages of court documents in the Depp v. Heard trial were unsealed. The docs, which were viewed by The Daily Beast, shed new light on the case seen ‘round the world, providing new insights into either team’s legal strategy and the reams of evidence that were excluded. Ultimately, as you’ll see, the mountain of docs do not appear to reflect too well on Team Depp.


Though Depp’s team spent many hours of the trial trying to paint Heard as the abuser in the relationship, an unsealed motion by Depp’s team opposing a mental examination of Depp argued that the actor should not be subjected to an independent medical examination, “Because Mr. Depp Is Not Alleging Harm Based On A Specific Physical or Mental Injury.” Depp’s team further claimed that, “Mr. Depp does not allege a specific cause of action for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress; does not assert that Ms. Heard’s actions caused him a specific psychiatric injury; and does not claim that Ms. Heard’s actions caused him to experience unusually severe emotional distress.”

Depp never claimed he suffered emotional distress from being assaulted by Heard. Therefore he doesn't need an independent witness to verify it.

Is this statement difficult for you to understand?

 

[cerebus]

Depp never claimed he suffered emotional distress from being assaulted by Heard. Therefore he doesn't need an independent witness to verify it.

Is this statement difficult for you to understand?

So he was abused just not the emotional distressy kind? Abuse-lite. Ok then.

Daily Mail picking up on the drop

 

[konfab]

So he was abused just not the emotional distressy kind? Abuse-lite. Ok then.

Having your finger cut off by your partner is abuse. Just because he didn't claim to suffer PTSD or other mental health issues, doesn't mean the physical abuse didn't happen. Which is why both sides had medical experts on in the case to testify about that particular injury.

It is might as well also have been a tactical decision to only talk about the physical abuse Heard inflicted on Depp, rather than any psychological abuse. Physical abuse, when it happens leaves mountains of evidence, like a severed finger. Psychological abuse does not. Depp's team focussed on what they could prove.

Had Amber Heard made a similar tactical decision to only focus on the psychological abuse that might have occurred, her defamation claim would have been extremely difficult to disprove and she would have won. I suspect that this is something a previous legal team probably suggested to her, but she didn't want anything to do with it, which is why she settled on a more incompetent team.

 

[Emjay]

So he was abused just not the emotional distressy kind? Abuse-lite. Ok then.

Daily Mail picking up on the drop

So your rebuttal is that she is not a gold digger?

 

[Emjay]

Having your finger cut off by your partner is abuse. Just because he didn't claim to suffer PTSD or other mental health issues, doesn't mean the physical abuse didn't happen. Which is why both sides had medical experts on in the case to testify about that particular injury.

It is might as well also have been a tactical decision, to only talk about the physical abuse Heard inflicted on Depp, rather than any psychological abuse. Had Amber Heard made a similar tactical decision to only focus on the psychological abuse that might have occurred, her claim would have been extremely difficult to disprove and she would have won.

Don't let facts get in the way of a narrative.

 

[G'Wobblez]

So he was abused just not the emotional distressy kind? Abuse-lite. Ok then.

Daily Mail picking up on the drop

Just as JD decided not to fight and settle with an NDA. Just to make it go away.
She still demanded 7 million.
Got rather pissed with JD when he decided to pay it straight to the charities she lied to..

 

[konfab]

Just as JD decided not to fight and settle with an NDA. Just to make it go away.
She still demanded 7 million.
Got rather pissed with JD when he decided to pay it straight to the charities she lied to..

If I were on that Jury, I would have awarded damages worth her divorce settlement. Considering she never donated that money, her coming up to pay for it wouldn't be an issue.

 

[Emjay]

Just as JD decided not to fight and settle with an NDA. Just to make it go away.
She still demanded 7 million.
Got rather pissed with JD when he decided to pay it straight to the charities she lied to..

IIRC, the demands were far higher. USD14 million, USD50k a month, utilities, a few of the condos in the building where they were living (I remember thinking if she was so badly abused, why would she want to own condos close to JD?), a vehicle...

It's one hell of a strange argument.