EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
So he was abused just not the emotional distressy kind? Abuse-lite. Ok then.



Daily Mail picking up on the drop

According to the legal document, the lawyers were after money made in Pirates 5 and not Pirates 4. Do these tabloids even read the legal document or just copy paste as quickly as possible?
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
So your rebuttal is that she is not a gold digger?

My rebuttal to what? I’m just reposting what Daily Mail said. I’ve long since given up trying to get through to the remoras at this point.
 

G'Wobblez

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
1,823
IIRC, the demands were far higher. USD14 million, USD50k a month, utilities, a few of the condos in the building where they were living (I remember thinking if she was so badly abused, why would she want to own condos close to JD?), a vehicle...

It's one hell of a strange argument.
All the penthouses. The up keep. The Range Rover the up keep.
The security the staff everything paid for. So she and her friends can stay without paying.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
Having your finger cut off by your partner is abuse. Just because he didn't claim to suffer PTSD or other mental health issues, doesn't mean the physical abuse didn't happen. Which is why both sides had medical experts on in the case to testify about that particular injury.

It is might as well also have been a tactical decision to only talk about the physical abuse Heard inflicted on Depp, rather than any psychological abuse. Physical abuse, when it happens leaves mountains of evidence, like a severed finger. Psychological abuse does not. Depp's team focussed on what they could prove.

Had Amber Heard made a similar tactical decision to only focus on the psychological abuse that might have occurred, her defamation claim would have been extremely difficult to disprove and she would have won. I suspect that this is something a previous legal team probably suggested to her, but she didn't want anything to do with it, which is why she settled on a more incompetent team.

Funny then that they wouldn’t hand over ANY evidence related to alleged abuse:

Among the unsealed court documents is a counterclaim filed by Depp’s legal team on February 7, 2022, objecting to Heard’s “fourth set of interrogatories.” In response to Heard’s team’s demand that Depp “Please describe in detail each and every incident during which You contend that Ms. Heard inflicted any type of physical or emotional violence or abuse upon you,” along with “dates, times and location, as well as a description of the communications and actions leading up to, through, and following such alleged violence or abuse,” Depp’s team “further objects to this interrogatory as unlikely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and that it seeks documents and communications that are irrelevant, immaterial, or unnecessary to the issues in this Action.”


The hoops you lot are jumping through to defend this guy…
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
Funny then that they wouldn’t hand over ANY evidence related to alleged abuse:




The hoops you lot are jumping through to defend this guy…

You on the other hand are defending Amber Heard tooth and nail when she is unarguably 100x more vile. Depp at least has some self awareness to admit some things he said or did were not great.
 

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,118
Funny then that they wouldn’t hand over ANY evidence related to alleged abuse:




The hoops you lot are jumping through to defend this guy…
Are you absolutely sure Daily Beast got that source right?

They say:
Among the unsealed court documents is a counterclaim filed by Depp’s legal team on February 7, 2022, objecting to Heard’s “fourth set of interrogatories.” In response to Heard’s team’s demand that Depp “Please describe in detail each and every incident during which You contend that Ms. Heard inflicted any type of physical or emotional violence or abuse upon you,” along with “dates, times and location, as well as a description of the communications and actions leading up to, through, and following such alleged violence or abuse,” Depp’s team “further objects to this interrogatory as unlikely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and that it seeks documents and communications that are irrelevant, immaterial, or unnecessary to the issues in this Action.”
The document repo is here
https://andreaburkhart.com/documents

The Forth set of interrogatories were actually made by Depp's team:
Screenshot 2022-08-01 170625.png

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/a5c67c18-f1c1-4485-b1dd-fbfba0ae3f0c/downloads/12 - 12.22.21 - Motion to Compel.pdf?ver=1659126339059

According to this, it was Amber Heard's team not wanting to provide the information. So it is the exact opposite of what the DailyBeast is claiming. Now I stand to be corrected here, but unless you provide the document that states that Amber Heard's interrogatories happened to be the same number as Depp's team, I am calling B.S on the Daily Beast.
Specifically, what you are looking for is a motion to compel Depp to answer those questions that were raised in the Daily Beast's article. I couldn't find anything like that before the date of Depp's team's motion to compel.

Here is a question for you: why doesn't the Daily Beast link to a copy of the original documents in their article?
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
Are you absolutely sure Daily Beast got that source right?

They say:

The document repo is here
https://andreaburkhart.com/documents

The Forth set of interrogatories were actually made by Depp's team:
View attachment 1357939

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/a5c67c18-f1c1-4485-b1dd-fbfba0ae3f0c/downloads/12 - 12.22.21 - Motion to Compel.pdf?ver=1659126339059

According to this, it was Amber Heard's team not wanting to provide the information. So it is the exact opposite of what the DailyBeast is claiming. Now I stand to be corrected here, but unless you provide the document that states that Amber Heard's interrogatories happened to be the same number as Depp's team, I am calling B.S on the Daily Beast.
Specifically, what you are looking for is a motion to compel Depp to answer those questions that were raised in the Daily Beast's article. I couldn't find anything like that before the date of Depp's team's motion to compel.

Here is a question for you: why doesn't the Daily Beast link to a copy of the original documents in their article?

I don’t have any way to find this info out atm
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
Are you absolutely sure Daily Beast got that source right?

They say:

The document repo is here
https://andreaburkhart.com/documents

The Forth set of interrogatories were actually made by Depp's team:
View attachment 1357939

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/a5c67c18-f1c1-4485-b1dd-fbfba0ae3f0c/downloads/12 - 12.22.21 - Motion to Compel.pdf?ver=1659126339059

According to this, it was Amber Heard's team not wanting to provide the information. So it is the exact opposite of what the DailyBeast is claiming. Now I stand to be corrected here, but unless you provide the document that states that Amber Heard's interrogatories happened to be the same number as Depp's team, I am calling B.S on the Daily Beast.
Specifically, what you are looking for is a motion to compel Depp to answer those questions that were raised in the Daily Beast's article. I couldn't find anything like that before the date of Depp's team's motion to compel.

Here is a question for you: why doesn't the Daily Beast link to a copy of the original documents in their article?

It was sus when the source was not provided. So, the second time they have printed absolute bunk.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,114
You on the other hand are defending Amber Heard tooth and nail when she is unarguably 100x more vile. Depp at least has some self awareness to admit some things he said or did were not great.

No he doesn’t. And Heard was very upfront in admitting to her role in starting fights and doing things she wasn’t proud of. Unlike Depp who made the laughable claim that he never touched her.

Meanwhile people here (you) are vilifying her for allegedly having affairs, while Depp was messaging Marilyn Manson about sex dungeons and 18-year old groupies. It’s sickening how you can stand by this guy.
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
No he doesn’t. And Heard was very upfront in admitting to her role in starting fights and doing things she wasn’t proud of. Unlike Depp who made the laughable claim that he never touched her.

Meanwhile people here (you) are vilifying her for allegedly having affairs, while Depp was messaging Marilyn Manson about sex dungeons and 18-year old groupies. It’s sickening how you can stand by this guy.

I do stand by him. In fact, I would have a beer with the guy and not bat an eyelid.

I take a very dim view to using sexual assault allegations (and fake abuse allegations) for personal gain. Heard even stole another women's sexual assault story to play the victim. So, carry on carrying water for that. Everyone has seen this woman for what she is, and she is reaping what is due to her.
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,441
No he doesn’t. And Heard was very upfront in admitting to her role in starting fights and doing things she wasn’t proud of. Unlike Depp who made the laughable claim that he never touched her.

Meanwhile people here (you) are vilifying her for allegedly having affairs, while Depp was messaging Marilyn Manson about sex dungeons and 18-year old groupies. It’s sickening how you can stand by this guy.

I talk about BDSM dungeons all the time with my friends. Almost convinced @UrBaN963 's cute friend/girlfriend (I actually don't know) that a mybb meet was a BDSM fetishist meetup if @Akasha 's husband didn't burst out laughing.
 

G'Wobblez

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
1,823
No he doesn’t. And Heard was very upfront in admitting to her role in starting fights and doing things she wasn’t proud of. Unlike Depp who made the laughable claim that he never touched her.

Meanwhile people here (you) are vilifying her for allegedly having affairs, while Depp was messaging Marilyn Manson about sex dungeons and 18-year old groupies. It’s sickening how you can stand by this guy.
Statements like this just show you didn’t watch the trial.
You and AH is trying to shovel shyt back into the horse.
She never admitted to anything, until after the court’s break and then after they saw what social media was saying she tried to change her testimony.

And what about the fecalphobia
And the Amica cream..
And the exact same pallet of bruise make up she was using that would have been shown in court.

Stop making fetch happen.
The shyt is out of the horse and you can not shovel it back.
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
Oh, and this Marylin Manson case is just next level crazy stuff. cerebus is on the wrong side yet again (unsurprisingly).

4 grown women with repressed memories, faked FBI letters, etc. You guys should check it out.
 

G'Wobblez

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
1,823

Maybe he should try not to be biased until he has all the evidence.
I haven’t made up my mind.
Loads still to come out.
But maybe we should start a whole new thread.
 

Lucas Buck

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
5,628

Maybe he should try not to be biased until he has all the evidence.
I haven’t made up my mind.
Loads still to come out.
But maybe we should start a whole new thread.
It just so happens that there is a MM thread which I directed Cerebus to, where everyone can dump all their MM related information.

 

G'Wobblez

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Messages
1,823
It just so happens that there is a MM thread which I directed Cerebus to, where everyone can dump all their MM related information.

Thank you. Will follow.
 
Top