EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[2023]

If you like, sure. But it's not what I'm saying. There's a conspiracy on here that JD never touched her, that all her accusations are a bald-faced lie, and that in reality the victim all along was HIM. It's beyond absurd. It's a pure fantasy. Somehow I guess it worked with the jury though so... whatever.

Well, this case the requirements of proof aren't as high as that as criminal cases. So it comes down to how authentic you think Amber's claims are. Not that it matters, I don't think Depp cares about the money really, its was more about airing the dirty laundry.

Amber came out as flappy fish market at the end of it, and I think that is all Depp really wanted at the end of the day.

 

[cerebus]

Well, this case the requirements of proof aren't as high as that as criminal cases. So it comes down to how authentic you think Amber's claims are. Not that it matters, I don't think Depp cares about the money really, its was more about airing the dirty laundry.

The requirements of proof were ludicrous. The UK trial had much more and definitive medical testimony. The US trial was pure media and as she put it "employees and randos". It WAS a smear campaign and it worked.

Amber came out as flappy fish market at the end of it, and I think that is all Depp really wanted at the end of the day.

You're not wrong about that

Lovely fellow this Depp.

 

[Howdy]

cerebus is always on the wrong side of these issues. In the Kavanaugh debacle, he also refused to acknowledge even basic facts.

But you don't understaaaand, the trial does not count. The reputable, credible fact checked sources says otherwise. iO says otherwise.

 

[2023]

The requirements of proof were ludicrous. The UK trial had much more and definitive medical testimony. The US trial was pure media and as she put it "employees and randos". It WAS a smear campaign and it worked.

Civil cases like this are usually preponderance of the evidence as I understand it. With Amber coming across as a total flappy fish market, you could easily lean towards her OP-ED being malicious.

Well, she has herself to blame for most of it really. Her witnesses were terrible paid for morons, Elaine is still a total dumbass as we speak.

So Depp wins in accordance to the US law. Just like Amber won her case too. Problem is that Amber isn't really worth much so she'd never get more out of it than Depp did.

Laughable to ask for 100 Million, and already puts her as disingenuous before the trial even starts.

 

[cerebus]

Civil cases like this are usually preponderance of the evidence as I understand it. With Amber coming across as a total flappy fish market, you could easily lean towards her OP-ED being malicious.

Well, she has herself to blame for most of it really. Her witnesses were terrible paid for morons, Elaine is still a total dumbass as we speak.

So Depp wins in accordance to the US law. Just like Amber won her case too. Problem is that Amber isn't really worth much so she'd never get more out of it than Depp did.

Laughable to ask for 100 Million, and already puts her as disingenuous before the trial even starts.

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

 

[Tman*]

This woman is delusional.

 

[ponder]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

You're losing your schit.

 

[YoungSandwich]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

You don't get to say what did and what didn't work on anybody.

 

[UrBaN963]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

You're from the same planet as Heard bru.

There was insufficient credible evidence to find Depp guilty.

There was sufficient credible evidence to find Heard guilty of defamation, so she was.

Each side presented evidence to support their claims. His side did a better job because they had evidence to produce. Her side did a worse job because they had to attempt to show evidence to backup false testimony, which they failed at.

At the end of the day, we don't know the full details of what exactly happened as we weren't there. The best we can do is go on the eivdence presented. And the evidence presented was sufficient to find his charges valid.

 

[2023]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

You know she counter sued for the comments made by Depp's lawyer right?

 

[Looney]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

Even if Depp did beat the shite out of her, she probably deserved it, the way she behaves, sis. She ain’t no lady. She an evil biatch. I’d love to beat the snot out of her myself. Disgusting excuse of a human. A waste of oxygen.

 

[cerebus]

You know she counter sued for the comments made by Depp's lawyer right?

Yes I know. And she won because her lawyer called her account "a hoax". Which contradicts the entire verdict in his favour.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

You have completely lost the plot here dude.

 

[G'Wobblez]

Even if Depp did beat the shite out of her, she probably deserved it, the way she behaves, sis. She ain’t no lady. She an evil biatch. I’d love to beat the snot out of her myself. Disgusting excuse of a human. A waste of oxygen.

you do sound looney. He should just not have married her.
Let her go in 2013.
But I guess we learned that people who are abused often goes back because they think the person will stop.

 

[UrBaN963]

Yes I know. And she won because her lawyer called her account "a hoax". Which contradicts the entire verdict in his favour.

Dude you literally don't even know what she won on. How are you arguing this **** when you're oblivious to anything that actually happened?

 

[cerebus]

You're losing your schit.

Even if Depp did beat the shite out of her, she probably deserved it, the way she behaves, sis. She ain’t no lady. She an evil biatch. I’d love to beat the snot out of her myself. Disgusting excuse of a human. A waste of oxygen.

Yeah what was I thinking

 

[2023]

Yes I know. And she won because her lawyer called her account "a hoax". Which contradicts the entire verdict in his favour.

Well, if I remember correctly, it was specifically saying they called the cops a 2nd time and roughed the place up. That was the part that was considered false and malicious.

Which doesn't contradict the OP-ED defamation rulings, so I don't see how that contradicts anything?

 

[cerebus]

Dude you literally don't even know what she won on. How are you arguing this **** when you're oblivious to anything that actually happened?

During the verdict, the jury found Depp liable of defamation for a statement his lawyer, Adam Waldman, published in The Daily Mail on April 27, 2020. The statement read: “Quite simply, this was an ambush. A Hoax. They set Mr. Depp up by calling the cops, but the first attempt did not do the trick. The officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly searched and interviewed and left after seeing no damages to face or property. So Amber and her friends spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their story straight under the direction of a lawyer and a publicist, and then placed a second call to 911.”

How am I wrong?

 

[TheMightyQuinn]

 

[UrBaN963]

How am I wrong?

Good, you've quoted it yourself, saved me the time. She didn't win on "it's a hoax". She won on the very detailed, descriptive narrative regarding her and her friends roughing up the place and spilling wine, speaking to a lawyer and publicist...

THAT statement, made by his lawyer, not himself, was found to be defamation. That specific statement in it's entirety with all of it's embellishments. She failed on the other two.