EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[Zyzzyva]

He really could have saved himself a lot of pain before putting a ring on her finger. She is textbook danger zone.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Good, you've quoted it yourself, saved me the time. She didn't win on "it's a hoax". She won on the very detailed, descriptive narrative regarding her and her friends roughing up the place and spilling wine, speaking to a lawyer and publicist...

THAT statement, made by his lawyer, not himself, was found to be defamation. That specific statement with all of it's embellishments. She failed on the other two.

No but Johnny is an arsehole abuser and Amber was white-washed in the court of public opinion... Don't you get it?

 

[ToxicBunny]

He really could have saved himself a lot of pain before putting a ring on her finger. She is textbook danger zone. View attachment 1330316

She is way outside of Danger Zone TBH.. her crazy level is at least 20.

 

[UrBaN963]

No but Johnny is an arsehole abuser and Amber was white-washed in the court of public opinion... Don't you get it?

Oh yea I forgot.

 

[cerebus]

Good, you've quoted it yourself, saved me the time. She didn't win on "it's a hoax". She won on the very detailed, descriptive narrative regarding her and her friends roughing up the place and spilling wine, speaking to a lawyer and publicist...

THAT statement, made by his lawyer, not himself, was found to be defamation. That specific statement in it's entirety with all of it's embellishments. She failed on the other two.

It's correct. he called the entire account a hoax. The jury disagreed, meaning they agreed with her account, meaning... what exactly?

 

[G'Wobblez]

Amber never won any case. The Sun did. Amber did get $2mil from the US verdict which is bizarrely contradictory. Anyway ultimately you just have to accept that the smear campaign worked on you, and I get that. Depp just comes across better than Heard. He's cheeky and charming and she's blubbery and icey. He had a killer team of lawyers and she had just boring normal lawyers with normal evidence and ****. You know Depp abused her and it doesn't matter, you just like Depp more. It's cool.

You should watch the trial.
Everyone thought that Depp bored the jury to tears. He struggles to talk and goes into these tangents and nobody stopped him. He only got a bit cheeky while they were presenting him with things that obviously came directly from AH. Like Mega Pint.

We all thought AH was going to be impact full, and all though she had the people hanging of her lips it was because of her strange acting. When she talked about truthful things she was actually very charming, then she would switch on acting when she retells things like her childhood and her "charity" work.. which turned out was because she was charged with Vehicular homicide and was court mandated that people would pick up the weirdness. It was like watching Jenkell and Hide, switching on and off and faces of hurt and then turn her face and no emotions at all.

That is why when the judge gave the time left before the break everyone was surprised since it felt like JD went on for months.

She lost the case for herself.
She made up so many lies that even if there was truth in between nobody could believe it, and then she had no one to back her up.
The text, photos and video from her phone was also not to be trusted.

​

 

[2023]

THAT statement, made by his lawyer, not himself, was found to be defamation. That specific statement in it's entirety with all of it's embellishments. She failed on the other two.

A much more mature, and nuance, discussion is how Depp is liable when the lawyer made the statement and can always hide behind his client confidentiality rights to hide who's statement is really is.

I'd also say lawyers don't do anything unless told too, but this is so hard to prove. I guess this is why liable cases are preponderance of the evidence?

 

[UrBaN963]

It's correct. he called the entire account a hoax. The jury disagreed, meaning they agreed with her account, meaning... what exactly?

No.

Quick question and not at all relevant to the discussion at hand but.......... did you watch the trial?

 

[G'Wobblez]

It's correct. he called the entire account a hoax. The jury disagreed, meaning they agreed with her account, meaning... what exactly?

no. There were 3 counts.

 

[G'Wobblez]

No.

Quick question and not at all relevant to the discussion at hand but.......... did you watch the trial?

He did not.

 

[konfab]

The requirements of proof were ludicrous. The UK trial had much more and definitive medical testimony. The US trial was pure media and as she put it "employees and randos". It WAS a smear campaign and it worked.

"Randos" like the TMZ editor who she leaked the story of her getting a protective order to her.

But onto what the UK trial claimed on:

In her witness statement, Ms Pennington said that Ms Heard had asked her to come over. She could see that Ms Heard’s hair was bloody from where a chunk had been pulled out, her face was red and her nose was swelling up. Her lip was bleeding. She said that Mr Depp had head butted her. Ms Pennington said that they called for assistance from a private nurse who was part of the concierge medical services which Mr Depp and Ms Heard used. Ms Pennington took pictures of Ms Heard’s face (see file 6/148(c)/F894.107-F894.120 and F894.124) which the metadata shows were taken on the morning and afternoon of 16th December 2015) and of the apartment including the graffiti on the counter-top (file 6/148(c)/F894.095)

One of the reasons why I am now a strict advocate of all trials being streamed on the internet is that you can get a good idea on whether the evidence of the case is actually good or not.

You know what the "evidence" of hair that were bloody were given?


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-hole-scalp-broken-bed-fight-Johnny-Depp.html

Where is the blood on the clump of hair? Where are the roots? Where is the skin?

Again, her own evidence does not match up with her testimony. If the hair broke, it would be sore, but there wouldn't be blood.

 

[dj2381]

"Randos" like the TMZ editor who she leaked the story of her getting a protective order to her.

But onto what the UK trial claimed on:


One of the reasons why I am now a strict advocate of all trials being streamed on the internet is that you can get a good idea on whether the evidence of the case is actually good or not.

You know what the "evidence" of hair that were bloody were given?

View attachment 1330320
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-hole-scalp-broken-bed-fight-Johnny-Depp.html

Where is the blood on the clump of hair? Where are the roots? Where is the skin?

Again, her own evidence does not match up with her testimony. If the hair broke, it would be sore, but there wouldn't be blood.

Probably pulled it out of the shower drain, lol.

 

[G'Wobblez]

"Randos" like the TMZ editor who she leaked the story of her getting a protective order to her.

But onto what the UK trial claimed on:


One of the reasons why I am now a strict advocate of all trials being streamed on the internet is that you can get a good idea on whether the evidence of the case is actually good or not.

You know what the "evidence" of hair that were bloody were given?

View attachment 1330320
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-hole-scalp-broken-bed-fight-Johnny-Depp.html

Where is the blood on the clump of hair? Where are the roots? Where is the skin?

Again, her own evidence does not match up with her testimony. If the hair broke, it would be sore, but there wouldn't be blood.

As a person with long hair I also thought wtf.
Her hair is longer than that, it looks like it comes form the shower. or broken off half way.
But no one questioned the evidence, the jury had to decide. And they obviously also thought wtf.

 

[konfab]

He did not.

It would be an affront to his religion. In the world of progressives, it is against the fundamental laws of reality that a rich white man can be a victim of abuse.

 

[cerebus]

"Randos" like the TMZ editor who she leaked the story of her getting a protective order to her.

The TMZ editor couldn't even confirm that it was her. It was speculative:

What the TMZ witness testified in the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial

Morgan Tremaine worked for the entertainment site known for its celebrity exclusives and gossip in 2016, and used to send paparazzi to photograph people after receiving tips

inews.co.uk

But onto what the UK trial claimed on:


One of the reasons why I am now a strict advocate of all trials being streamed on the internet is that you can get a good idea on whether the evidence of the case is actually good or not.

You know what the "evidence" of hair that were bloody were given?

View attachment 1330320
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-hole-scalp-broken-bed-fight-Johnny-Depp.html

Where is the blood on the clump of hair? Where are the roots? Where is the skin?

Again, her own evidence does not match up with her testimony. If the hair broke, it would be sore, but there wouldn't be blood.

Sorry are you talking about the UK trial now? Well let's look at that one shall we?

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Judgment-FINAL.pdf

In her witness statement, Ms Pennington said that Ms Heard had asked her to come over. She could see that Ms Heard’s hair was bloody from where a chunk had been pulled out, her face was red and her nose was swelling up. Her lip was bleeding. She said that Mr Depp had head butted her. Ms Pennington said that they called for assistance from a private nurse who was part of the concierge medical services which Mr Depp and Ms Heard used. Ms Pennington took pictures of Ms Heard’s face (see file 6/148(c)/F894.107-F894.120 and F894.124) which the metadata shows were taken on the morning and afternoon of 16th December 2015) and of the apartment including the graffiti on the counter-top (file 6/148(c)/F894.095). 424. Ms Pennington said that Ms Heard gave an account of what had happened. This was broadly in line with her subsequent statement. Ms Pennington said that the next day she and Ms Heard were exhausted and Ms Heard was shaken, upset and trying to pull herself together for the show.

So her neighbour testified to seeing her hair ripped out but Konfab knows she's lying because "the photo". Credit where it's due, you never met a conspiracy you didn't like. 11 eyewitnesses testifying against Depp but you're suddenly an expert on forensic photography. Ok.

 

[Lucas Buck]

The TMZ editor couldn't even confirm that it was her. It was speculative:

What the TMZ witness testified in the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial

Morgan Tremaine worked for the entertainment site known for its celebrity exclusives and gossip in 2016, and used to send paparazzi to photograph people after receiving tips

inews.co.uk

Here is the 16 minute tmz testimony. Maybe it will give you a better idea as to why it's not far fetched to conclude that Heard and her team were the ones leaking information to tmz. He did not have to confirm that Heard leaked the video. The testimony allowed everyone to connect the dots.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Here is the 16 minute tmz testimony. Maybe it will give you a better idea as to why it's not far fetched to conclude that Heard and her team were the ones leaking information to tmz. He did not have to confirm that Heard leaked the video. The testimony allowed everyone to connect the dots.

He's lying cos he has a crush on Johnny, it's obvious.. Amber is still the shiznit and a victim of evil dickwad Johnny.

 

[G'Wobblez]

He testified so that he doesn’t throw tmz or the sources under the bus.
He explained how verification works and how TMZ became the legal owner of the copyrighted video.
Even the channels showing the trial was struck with a copyright violation. Although it was court footage.

 

[G'Wobblez]

The TMZ editor couldn't even confirm that it was her. It was speculative:

What the TMZ witness testified in the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial

Morgan Tremaine worked for the entertainment site known for its celebrity exclusives and gossip in 2016, and used to send paparazzi to photograph people after receiving tips

inews.co.uk

Sorry are you talking about the UK trial now? Well let's look at that one shall we?

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Judgment-FINAL.pdf

So her neighbour testified to seeing her hair ripped out but Konfab knows she's lying because "the photo". Credit where it's due, you never met a conspiracy you didn't like. 11 eyewitnesses testifying against Depp but you're suddenly an expert on forensic photography. Ok.

She never saw the hair being ripped out Amber told her that that is what happened.

She saw hair.
And she saw the red marks on her scull.( the evidence doesn’t show her scalp being ripped out) its a small red dot.
If she went to a doctor or a dermatologist it would have been documented.

But she never saw JD do it.
For all the jury know she could have done it herself and told her friend that is what happened.

If the metadata was produced at the uK hearing why did she go to all the lengths to not give it to the virginia court?
Where is the medical records?

Her lies made it difficult for the jury to believe secondhand testimony.

You need to watch the trial.

 

[G'Wobblez]

Oh in regards to the medical records, rocky said they did but the nurse said she didn’t see anything and there were no records of her seeing AH ( iirc) the nurse weren’t called in the uk trial.
Who do you believe. A medical professional paid by JD or AH friend who is living remt free who might be loosing her place of residence?

Difficult. Because either one could have motifs to lie.