EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

2023

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
10,673
She showed recorded confession of him hitting her. And messages. And witness testimonies. And pictures. And videos. And medical evidence. My opinion is based on the evidence.

I remember there being a lack of medical evidence in the trial?
 

Moosedrool

Honorary Master
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
11,442
She showed recorded confession of him hitting her. And messages. And witness testimonies. And pictures. And videos. And medical evidence. My opinion is based on the evidence.

Wasn't all of this refuted in this trail?
 
Last edited:

YoungSandwich

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
705
She showed recorded confession of him hitting her. And messages. And witness testimonies. And pictures. And videos. And medical evidence. My opinion is based on the evidence.
None of which holds up to any cross-examination.

The messages are taken out of context - half of the texts that Amber's team showed 0 contexts, and if you took 5 minutes to look up the full transcript you would understand this.

All of Amber's witnesses had an invested interest in her winning as most of them were living on Depps paycheck, in his home, free of charge. Not to mention - none of their stories correlate with each other.

Pictures that prove nothing - and have been altered.

Videos that prove nothing - and have been set up during instances of manipulation of Depp.

Medical evidence - that does not exist.

Your opinion is based on nothing but your own opinion which is wrong.
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
22,991
She is just so unlikable with all that spin and BS.
It does not help that she actually chose to wear the evil uniform

cyZwaWQ9QXBp
QSZwaWQ9QXBp
OCZwaWQ9QXBp
 

Lucas Buck

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
5,628
Yes he implied it and perhaps believes it and perhaps it's even true. But it's still speculation.
The sequence of events;
1 )Depps lawyer accuses Heard of contacting tmz

2) Heard says that she did not contact tmz

3) Depps lawyer then plays a clip of a deposition where Heard stays that she wanted Depp to find out about the divorce filing and I quote "from someone other than tmz which was alerted". In the deposition her reaction is that of someone who had slipped up by mentioning that tmz was alerted.

Depps lawyers then manage to get an ex-tmz employee to testify on how they were provided with the video of Depp slamming the cabinets, and all the times that they were called out to photograph Heard. The video recording could have only come from Heard or people close to her because she was the copyright owner.
So, at this point whose version of events would the jury or any normal person start believing regarding tmz? Heards denial on the stand or the dots that Depps team were connecting?
 
Last edited:

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
Jees the "Truth to Power" crap.. what is this, the 90's?

Nope. It's a real thing. It's not speaking truth. It's speaking "power to my truth". Or speaking "power to truth". She says it often and it's a manipulation tactic. It's very popular in circles that push the concept of intersectionality.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,498
Nope. It's a real thing. It's not speaking truth. It's speaking "power to my truth". Or speaking "power to truth". She says it often and it's a manipulation tactic. It's very popular in circles that push the concept of intersectionality.

Yeah sorry... "Power to Truth"...

And its 100% a manipulation tactic and its largely a big sign that the person is talking shyte and will shout you down if you try point it out.
 

Lucas Buck

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
5,628
Yeah sorry... "Power to Truth"...

And its 100% a manipulation tactic and its largely a big sign that the person is talking shyte and will shout you down if you try point it out.

She has been given a script of talking points by her pr team, and as long as her target audience buys what she is selling it doesn't matter how much shyte she talks.
The "injustice" of this trial is feminist porn, they will be feasting for years on the outcome.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,498
She has been given a script of talking points by her pr team, and as long as her target audience buys what she is selling it doesn't matter how much shyte she talks.
The "injustice" of this trial is feminist porn, they will be feasting for years on the outcome.

Yeah I know... and its going to be a glorious feast to watch because they'll just make utter retards of themselves all over again.
 
Top