She never claimed to have paid it in full. She only said she had donated the money. Big money donations do generally happen in the form of pledges. You were the one who claimed that they were not interchangeable and now you're shifting the rules to gripe about the manner in which she paid it, which is not honest.
God man, seriously, go get clarity on the exact meanings of these words dude.
SHE hasn't paid the money SHE promised to pay. She has had some money paid on her behalf, but she has not paid the money she promised to pay. So she has not donated the money. If you look in the bank account, the money is not there. Gone. Nada. Nothing. No money. Bounced debit orders. Where is the money? I'll tell you where it is - not there! Do you understand that part? So she HAS NOT donated the money. She has not attempted to donate the money. She has not made multiple partial payments towards a final sum.
The transactions have not taken place. Thus, the pledge remains unfulfilled and the donation remains a myth. A pipe dream. A fallacy. A nothing. A coulda-woulda-shoulda-didn't.
I never shifted a thing, I made the same statement months ago when this originally came up. Because the facts remain the same and the meanings of words remain constant.
Now, if your argument was that she has not YET donated the FULL amount but was working toward it in regular instalments, I'd be open to discussion on the matter. As it stands though, those charities are currently feeding the children tasty promises as there is no money to buy them actual food because no DONATION ever took place.
What's your native language? I'll try this again. Is it Tagalog? I feel like it's Tagalog.
thesaurus.plus
www.sportskeeda.com
Sign up with Google