EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,823
why do I keep coming back to this thread? Ai

Maybe you're into s&m or things like that. You're quite 'woke' for lack of a better definition but the telling thing in this thread is that the usual crowd that would 'like' your posts or back you up are conspicuously absent, quieter than crickets. You're like a lone soul tilting at windmills which says a lot. It's entertaining though.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Maybe you're into s&m or things like that. You're quite 'woke' for lack of a better definition but the telling thing in this thread is that the usual crowd that would 'like' your posts or back you up are conspicuously absent, quieter than crickets. You're like a lone soul tilting at windmills which says a lot. It's entertaining though.

I know I know. There is just. so. much. evidence though. What can I do?

josh-drew.jpeg

Screenshot 2022-06-29 at 10.07.48.png

Screenshot 2022-06-29 at 10.08.14.png

Screenshot 2022-06-29 at 10.10.49.png

Screenshot 2022-06-29 at 10.11.26.png
FWRirA0UEAE-LbJ.jpeg

FWRisGiUIAAwghI.jpeg



The collective delusion in this thread is really something to see
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
22,991
So a pathological liar married a pathological egotist..... how do you tell which is which?

You let them speak and found out..... well we found out.
 

Splinter

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
30,829
Oh I'm sure there's a lot you tldr'd.

Tell me something - where was all this "evidence" in the trial and why was she found guilty of defamation and him, by default, not guilty of abuse?

Also, how long have you been in love with her?
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Tell me something - where was all this "evidence" in the trial and why was she found guilty of defamation and him, by default, not guilty of abuse?

All that evidence is either in the US trial or the UK trial.

Why was she found guilty? I don't know. It's an abysmal verdict. The evidence is absolutely overwhelming.
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
All that evidence is either in the US trial or the UK trial.

Why was she found guilty? I don't know. It's an abysmal verdict. The evidence is absolutely overwhelming.

She was not found guilty. They found Depp's version of the story to be more credible. The evidence is not overwhelming as it was not in the trial. There is a legal process for a reason.

Move on, man. She is a despicable human. She did this for fame and attention. She did abuse Depp and he begged her to not to go public. He was trying to look after her after her divorce and she did what she did anyway. Depp went in and at least admitted he is flawed and he is deeply ashamed by what happened. Ms Heard cannot even own up to bald face lies. The reality is she had some very serious character flaws and those two probably played off one another. If she didn't lie the way she did, and admitted to her own faults, flaws and mistakes the outcome would have been very different.
 

Splinter

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
30,829
All that evidence is either in the US trial or the UK trial.

Why was she found guilty? I don't know. It's an abysmal verdict. The evidence is absolutely overwhelming.

Yes, the evidence that you are totally infatuated with Turd-girl is indeed overwhelming.
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
She was not found guilty. They found Depp's version of the story to be more credible. The evidence is not overwhelming as it was not in the trial. There is a legal process for a reason.

She was found guilty of defamation. what are you talking about? I think someone needs to spend more time watching very qualified lawtubers

Move on, man. She is a despicable human. She did this for fame and attention. She did abuse Depp and he begged her to not to go public. He was trying to look after her after her divorce and she did what she did anyway. Depp went in and at least admitted he is flawed and he is deeply ashamed by what happened. Ms Heard cannot even own up to bald face lies.

Wow your version of Depp is quite a hero. What's the evidence of Depp begging her not to go public? Perhaps you're mistaking it for when he said she was "begging for global humiliation". Or for the clip where Heard begged Depp not to cut himself when he was drunk and suicidal, then he asks her if she wants to be cut as well?

 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
She was found guilty of defamation. what are you talking about? I think someone needs to spend more time watching very qualified lawtubers



Wow your version of Depp is quite a hero. What's the evidence of Depp begging her not to go public? Perhaps you're mistaking it for when he said she was "begging for global humiliation". Or for the clip where Heard begged Depp not to cut himself when he was drunk and suicidal, then he asks her if she wants to be cut as well?


Guilty is not a term used for such cases. Even journalists know this.

There is a long recording of him begging her. I would post it, but I really am not going to waste my time because you will not accept anything but your own sources. I have seen all the evidence presented and I just don't find anything credible. Depp explained the circumstances around why he asked her to cut him, and I believe him. You can find the source yourself.

She lost. Get over it.
 

YoungSandwich

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
705
Wow your version of Depp is quite a hero. What's the evidence of Depp begging her not to go public? Perhaps you're mistaking it for when he said she was "begging for global humiliation". Or for the clip where Heard begged Depp not to cut himself when he was drunk and suicidal, then he asks her if she wants to be cut as well?


First link is wrong - That surgeon didn't prove anything

1st) It was his opinion. Depp's brought on another surgeon to counter his claims. Proves nothing.

2nd) He never said it was impossible - only that he could not determine what caused the damage. Even then, his testimony did not make sense when looking at the actual damage to the finger. Depp's surgeon backed up the claim that it could be caused by a glass shard, which was backed up by evidence of broken glass found at the scene. In the exact place that Depp's doctor at the time (either doctor or bodyguard) stated the glass would be found, which in turn matched Depps story on how the finger was cut in the first place.

2nd link - If you watched the trial you would know we are dealing with a very theatrical character in Depp.

He brought the knife because Amber invited him over months after they had broken up and defamed him in the media with false abuse allegations, so when he arrived there he pulled out the knife and told Amber to "take my blood because that is all I have left to give you."

Again, if you took the time to research what you are actually posting you would understand the context behind this "evidence". But you are too smart for that apparently. Pretty sure we have covered this again like 20 pages back.
 
Last edited:

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
First link is wrong - That surgeon didn't prove anything

1st) It was his opinion. Depp's brought on another surgeon to counter his claims. Proves nothing.

2nd) He never said it was impossible - only that he could not determine what caused the damage. Even then, his testimony did not make sense when looking at the actual damage to the finger. Depp's surgeon backed up the claim that it could be caused by a glass shared, which was backed up by evidence of broken glass found at the scene. In the exact place that Depp's doctor at the time (either doctor or bodyguard) stated the glass would be found, which in turn matched Depps story on how the finger was cut in the first place.

Depp said at least 3 times that he cut his finger off. But yeah fair enough let's agree with Depp's witness that it's impossible to say definitively what happened with his finger.

2nd link - If you watched the trial you would know we are dealing with a very theatrical character in Depp.

He brought the knife because Amber invited him over months after they had broken up and defamed him in the media with false abuse allegations, so when he arrived there he pulled out the knife and told Amber to "take my blood because that is all I have left to give you."

Again, if you took the time to research what you are actually posting you would understand the context behind this "evidence". But you are too smart for that apparently. Pretty sure we have covered this again like 20 pages back.

That is what Depp claims yeah. You certainly believe whatever he says and disbelieve anything Amber says, even if it predates the trials by 5 years. He did ask her if he should cut her too.

Guilty is not a term used for such cases. Even journalists know this.

There is a long recording of him begging her. I would post it, but I really am not going to waste my time because you will not accept anything but your own sources. I have seen all the evidence presented and I just don't find anything credible. Depp explained the circumstances around why he asked her to cut him, and I believe him. You can find the source yourself.

I know you believe him. I'm just looking for the recording. Google comes up empty.
 
Top