EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[Emjay]

Depp said at least 3 times that he cut his finger off. But yeah fair enough let's agree with Depp's witness that it's impossible to say definitively what happened with his finger.



That is what Depp claims yeah. You certainly believe whatever he says and disbelieve anything Amber says, even if it predates the trials by 5 years. He did ask her if he should cut her too.



I know you believe him. I'm just looking for the recording. Google comes up empty.

 

[cerebus]

Thanks i'll take a listen

 

[lowriderza]

I would be interested to see if the people who studied and understood Logic Systems in their technical careers correlates with the people supporting Johnny Depp on here. Simmilar systems are of course found in Epistemology. And when you link this to the American Justice System which rely a lot less on hearsay as say France and the UK the outcome of the case in Virginia actually makes a lot of sense.

 

[G'Wobblez]

She wasn’t found guilty.
This was a defamation trial.
Not a guilty not guilty trial.

It was a civil case not criminal

 

[cerebus]

She wasn’t found guilty.
This was a defamation trial.
Not a guilty not guilty trial.

It was a civil case not criminal

Ok, ok conceded fair enough. I'm hardly a lawyer. But on the other hand the closest I've ever come in my marriage to a blood bath is when we didn't realize she was on her period till afterwards.. So There's that I guess.

 

[Lucas Buck]

Lawyers reacting to Heard's lawyer's ineptitude.

 

[tetrasect]

All that evidence is either in the US trial or the UK trial.

Why was she found guilty? I don't know. It's an abysmal verdict. The evidence is absolutely overwhelming.

Did you actually watch the trial?

She claims he beat the living **** out of her, literally punching her in the face more times than she could count, yet in pictures taken the next day she's seen laughing it up, looking like a million bucks.

Google image search for "domestic abuse victims" and you will see what actual evidence looks like that would corroborate her insane stories.

The only evidence that's absolutely overwhelming in this case is the evidence of her blatant and frankly disgusting lies.

 

[YoungSandwich]

Did you actually watch the trial?

She claims he beat the living **** out of her, literally punching her in the face more times than she could count, yet in pictures taken the next day she's seen laughing it up, looking like a million bucks.

Google image search for "domestic abuse victims" and you will see what actual evidence looks like that would corroborate her insane stories.

The only evidence that's absolutely overwhelming in this case is the evidence of her blatant and frankly disgusting lies.

To answer your question, no he didn't.

But who needs evidence cross-examined by a team of legal experts who have trained their whole lives for this when you can just read the Twitter headlines and get the full picture from there?

 

[Deleted member]

To answer your question, no he didn't.

But who needs evidence cross-examined by a team of legal experts who have trained their whole lives for this when you can just read the Twitter headlines and get the full picture from there?

This forum has extensive experts with opinions across a wide range of subjects...................who are these so called legal experts you refer to..............do they have at least 10000 posts on MyBB?

 

[Moosedrool]

Did you actually watch the trial?

She claims he beat the living **** out of her, literally punching her in the face more times than she could count, yet in pictures taken the next day she's seen laughing it up, looking like a million bucks.

Google image search for "domestic abuse victims" and you will see what actual evidence looks like that would corroborate her insane stories.

The only evidence that's absolutely overwhelming in this case is the evidence of her blatant and frankly disgusting lies.

Makeup and ice...

 

[cerebus]

Did you actually watch the trial?

She claims he beat the living **** out of her, literally punching her in the face more times than she could count, yet in pictures taken the next day she's seen laughing it up, looking like a million bucks.

Google image search for "domestic abuse victims" and you will see what actual evidence looks like that would corroborate her insane stories.

The only evidence that's absolutely overwhelming in this case is the evidence of her blatant and frankly disgusting lies.

You know there is a thing called makeup right?

Melanie Inglessis' testimony is very credible and compelling:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1539162361835159553

Same with Laurel Anderson who was actually Depp's witness:

https://www.reddit.com/r/DeppDelusion/comments/updi6v

In the UK trial there's even nurse testimony of seeing the bruises and torn hair:

Nevertheless there was plenty of photographic evidence of her bruises in public from paparazzi pics and such going back as far as 2012:

Makeup and ice...

Apparently Amber is both such a gifted makeup artist that she can fake bruises, but not good enough to cover them. Much logic.

 

[cerebus]

Depp is such a pathetic liar

i DID NOT throw her phone at her!!! i was facing away from her to walk away and lobbed it over my shoulder… i had no idea that she wouldn’t just catch it, or if would land on the couch

[

 

[cerebus]

I can't make any sense out of this audio. It's supposed to be about the WAPO article but I rather suspect it's about the 2015 Sun article. See the pic above for Depp's messages about not forcing Heard to leave the house, which is referenced in the call, from 2015.

Ah here we are, in the second video he confirms it's from 2016. So... not actually about the article then. So Depp is actually begging her not to go to court about the DV accusations. Yeah that's great. That second piece of audio is really something.

It's also misleadingly transcribed, i.e. "That's why I [unintelligible] is transcribed as "that's why I accused you of those things".

 

[ShaunSA]

I can't make any sense out of this audio. It's supposed to be about the WAPO article but I rather suspect it's about the 2015 Sun article. See the pic above for Depp's messages about not forcing Heard to leave the house, which is referenced in the call, from 2015.

Ah here we are, in the second video he confirms it's from 2016. So... not actually about the article then. So Depp is actually begging her not to go to court about the DV accusations. Yeah that's great. That second piece of audio is really something.

It's also misleadingly transcribed, i.e. "That's why I [unintelligible] is transcribed as "that's why I accused you of those things".

Have you ever considered applying to be Amber's legal representative in her appeal?

You will win this thing hands down. Even that Ms Vasquez has nothing on you

 

[tetrasect]

You know there is a thing called makeup right?

Melanie Inglessis' testimony is very credible and compelling:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1539162361835159553

Same with Laurel Anderson who was actually Depp's witness:

https://www.reddit.com/r/DeppDelusion/comments/updi6v

In the UK trial there's even nurse testimony of seeing the bruises and torn hair:

Nevertheless there was plenty of photographic evidence of her bruises in public from paparazzi pics and such going back as far as 2012:

Apparently Amber is both such a gifted makeup artist that she can fake bruises, but not good enough to cover them. Much logic.

Again, she said he punched her in the face more times than she could count, with rings on his fingers.
There would be severe swelling, broken skin, bleeding, possibly broken bones, a concussion and most importantly medical records and pictures. People would notice and take her to hospital if she went out in public.

You can't put makeup on this:

Victim says abuse had psychological impact

A woman beaten and raped by her ex-partner says the worst part was the psychological abuse she suffered and has called for the law to be changed.

www.bbc.com

You're showing me pictures of a cat scratch and testimony of a makeup artist who saw a slightly swollen lip.
My girlfriend has worse bruising on her body just from being clumsy and bumping into things.

Additionally, Amber took pictures of all kinds of stuff in an attempt to make Depp look bad and she did take pictures of her injuries. Problem is, instead of showing the aftermath of what she claims happened, what we see is indistinguishable from an application of a thin layer of blush, on photos that were proven to be photoshopped.

And BTW the lady in that ESPN post went on the show a week after she sustained the injuries at a time when there was no more swelling. Also, those bruises were sustained during a sparring session where they don't even make fists. So not even remotely comparable to what amber would have looked like.

You're completely ignoring what the real life outcome of a severe beating of the type she described would be and offering weak proof of injuries that are miniscule and completely incompatible with her testimony.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Again, she said he punched her in the face more times than she could count, with rings on his fingers.
There would be severe swelling, broken skin, bleeding, possibly broken bones, a concussion and most importantly medical records and pictures. People would notice and take her to hospital if she went out in public.

You can't put makeup on this:

Victim says abuse had psychological impact

A woman beaten and raped by her ex-partner says the worst part was the psychological abuse she suffered and has called for the law to be changed.

www.bbc.com

You're showing me pictures of a cat scratch and testimony of a makeup artist who saw a slightly swollen lip.
My girlfriend has worse bruising on her body just from being clumsy and bumping into things.

Additionally, Amber took pictures of all kinds of stuff in an attempt to make Depp look bad and she did take pictures of her injuries. Problem is, instead of showing the aftermath of what she claims happened, what we see is indistinguishable from an application of a thin layer of blush, on photos that were proven to be photoshopped.

And BTW the lady in that ESPN post went on the show a week after she sustained the injuries at a time when there was no more swelling. Also, those bruises were sustained during a sparring session where they don't even make fists. So not even remotely comparable to what amber would have looked like.

You're completely ignoring what the real life outcome of a severe beating of the type she described would be and offering proof of injuries that are miniscule and completely incompatible with her testimony.

Come now man... leave the man be in his white knighting for Turd Heard....

Maybe one day she will read this thread and be so overcome with emotion that she'll offer to kak in his bed.

 

[Moosedrool]

You know there is a thing called makeup right?

Melanie Inglessis' testimony is very credible and compelling:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1539162361835159553

Same with Laurel Anderson who was actually Depp's witness:

https://www.reddit.com/r/DeppDelusion/comments/updi6v

In the UK trial there's even nurse testimony of seeing the bruises and torn hair:

Nevertheless there was plenty of photographic evidence of her bruises in public from paparazzi pics and such going back as far as 2012:

Apparently Amber is both such a gifted makeup artist that she can fake bruises, but not good enough to cover them. Much logic.

Are you serious?

Even if that was JD that shows a severe amount of restraint. Pushing off a crazy abuser can leave worse marks.

 

[TelkomUseless]

Have you ever considered applying to be Amber's legal representative in her appeal?

You will win this thing hands down. Even that Ms Vasquez has nothing on you

Cerebus still batting for Amber . He has quite a hard on for Amber. He just need to send his findings to Amber's appeal and it's a win before it starts.

 

[TelkomUseless]

Are you serious?

Even if that was JD that shows a severe amount of restraint. Pushing off a crazy abuser can leave worse marks.

And crazy abusive girlfriend would never self harm to make other party look abusive... never!!!

 

[ShaunSA]

Vasquez: Blah blah blah blah blah
Cerebus: Objection hearsay
Judge: Sustained

Imagine that twenty times over
The Yanksville legal system is going to be schooled by one MyBB'er. We're all gona be famous!

/gets ready for interviews on my interactions with @cerebus over the last decade