EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[tetrasect]

I never said you you specifically were a misogynist but if you relate to label, thanks for letting us know

No, you never mentioned anyone specifically, instead you made a general statement implying that people who Cerberus argues with are "misogynists".

Despite what Amber would have you believe, an implied statement is as defamatory as a specific one (every certified MyBB lawyer knows this to be true).

 

[C4Cat]

Oh please, go be Ambers defence attorney - you two speak the same level of BS.

You literally just proudly called yourself a misogynist, that wasn't me.

This is an example of misogyny on this this thread:

The more I look at Amber Turd, the more I realise how fugly she is. Watching her on the stand, I couldn’t stand her. I myself wanted to punch her in the face. She is just a despicable human being. She’s not hot. I would not bang and I would not touch her with Cerebus’s peepee.

Amber heard looks like she got beaten with an ugly stick (oh wait, that wasDepps rings). Sis, she’s so ugly. Ewwwwww!

Was this you?
Though the way you continuously refer to her as turd girl and amber turd definitely gets you into the club. Well done

 

[Splinter]

You literally just proudly called yourself a misogynist, that wasn't me.

This is an example of misogyny on this this thread:


Was this you?
Though the way you continuously refer to her as turd girl and amber turd definitely gets you into the club. Well done

Nope, I literally did not. The fact that to you, me disparaging a single female (proven in a court of law to be a liar) makes me a despiser of all women, reveals your gender/sex issues very clearly.

You man-haters are so blind it's comical

 

[2023]

Here's the image they submitted vs the original. I'll leave it to you to guess which one was shopped.

Why is the top one such poor quality? Isn't there a better quality one to look at?

 

[cerebus]

Why is the top one such poor quality? Isn't there a better quality one to look at?

The top one is literally the one they submitted as evidence

 

[cerebus]

This thread summed up in one sentence. When a mod is a troll.

She was found guilty in a very lengthy trial with her lawyers paid millions. She lied consistently. To argue what she lied or did not lie about is IMO pointless.

I'm not a mod and I'm not a troll.

 

[2023]

The top one is literally the one they submitted as evidence

Why wasn't the clear one submitted as evidence by Amber?

 

[tetrasect]

The top one is literally the one they submitted as evidence

And what was Depp's testimony about how he sustained the injury?

Did he say that Amber punched him in the face so many times he couldn't count? And so severely that he thought he was gonna die?

No.

 

[skimread]

I'm not a mod and I'm not a troll.

Notice I didn't name you. How did you know I was talking about you?

 

[cerebus]

Why wasn't the clear one submitted as evidence by Amber?

It's in the same damn video (2:55)

Johnny Depp Claims He Did Not Try to Get Amber Heard Fired from 'Aquaman 2' (Trial Highlights) | Johnny Depp is cross-examined again and denies claims he tried to get Amber Heard fired from the 'Aquaman' sequel. | By Entertainment Tonight | Facebook

1.3M views, 5K likes, 710 loves, 1K comments, 313 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Entertainment Tonight: Johnny Depp is cross-examined again and denies claims he tried to get Amber Heard fired...

www.facebook.com

WATCH THE TRIALLLL

Here's Amber claiming that it's photoshopped after Camille tried to pass it off as proof that she injured him and then tried to talk over Amber when Amber responded

 

[2023]

It's in the same damn video (2:55)

Johnny Depp Claims He Did Not Try to Get Amber Heard Fired from 'Aquaman 2' (Trial Highlights) | Johnny Depp is cross-examined again and denies claims he tried to get Amber Heard fired from the 'Aquaman' sequel. | By Entertainment Tonight | Facebook

1.3M views, 5K likes, 710 loves, 1K comments, 313 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Entertainment Tonight: Johnny Depp is cross-examined again and denies claims he tried to get Amber Heard fired...

www.facebook.com

WATCH THE TRIALLLL

Here's Amber claiming that it's photoshopped after Camille tried to pass it off as proof that she injured him and then tried to talk over Amber when Amber responded

Not asking what she said I'm asking why didn't Amber put the original clear one in as her evidence?

 

[cerebus]

Come on now. You're being dishonest. Your original claim is completely different to the reality.

See my post above. It's not dishonest at all.

Her expert witnesses were an absolute joke including a psychologist who diagnosed her without proper testing, a talent agent "in name only" who thought Herd's career is comparable to Jason Momoa's and a digital expert who was tasked to link general dislike of Amber to Waldman's statements yet failed to do so.

Shannon Curry is the only psychologist who diagnosed her without proper testing. What are you on about?

Again with the UK trial?

You do realize the UK trial is still a real verdict, right? And it was upheld on review, which the US trial is yet to do. Depp was absolutely slaughtered in the UK trial. Obviously he learned some lessons from that experience though.

Here's a gem from the UK trial:

https://www.reddit.com/r/DeppDelusion/comments/vrpss1

What's his current excuse for that whole event? It was an accidental headbutt, right? Um um um.... please Johnny just say some words and we'll believe you.

You'd call Amber's friend impartial?

He's the ex of her former best friend. What skin does he have in it? Here's the UK judge again:

iii) In my view Mr Drew was an impressive witness. He gave his evidence carefully and conceded some matters even when alternative answers would have better suited Ms Heard and the Defendants. I accept his evidence, including his account of what he saw of Mr Depp that night, the injury to Ms Heard's face, and his denial that the photographs of her face and the damage to the apartments was staged in any way.

Watch his testimony, it is really very compelling.

He said she had "significant facial injuries", then said that the pictures match what he saw.

Would you call these injuries significant? And does it match Amber Heard's testimony?

Notice her lip in the picture below (why no damage? That would suggest the lip injury happened after this pic was taken):

Notice her nose in the picture below (looks perfect, proving it was just bad lighting in the first pic):

Your entire case seems to rest on the argument that her bruises weren't big enough. But here's the issue - why wouldn't she have painted them on bigger if she was faking them?? If it's all some gone girl conspiracy, why not go much bigger? Her bruises in my opinion are perfectly consistent with someone who was just systematically whacked, maybe not life-threateningly all the time, but on a very regular basis, the same way someone would hit a dog.

 

[cerebus]

Not asking what she said I'm asking why didn't Amber put the original clear one in as her evidence?

She did, in the same video. Did you even read my post?

 

[Splinter]

See my post above. It's not dishonest at all.



Shannon Curry is the only psychologist who diagnosed her without proper testing. What are you on about?



You do realize the UK trial is still a real verdict, right? And it was upheld on review, which the US trial is yet to do. Depp was absolutely slaughtered in the UK trial. Obviously he learned some lessons from that experience though.

Here's a gem from the UK trial:

https://www.reddit.com/r/DeppDelusion/comments/vrpss1

What's his current excuse for that whole event? It was an accidental headbutt, right? Um um um.... please Johnny just say some words and we'll believe you.



He's the ex of her former best friend. What skin does he have in it? Here's the UK judge again:



Watch his testimony, it is really very compelling.



Your entire case seems to rest on the argument that her bruises weren't big enough. But here's the issue - why wouldn't she have painted them on bigger if she was faking them?? If it's all some gone girl conspiracy, why not go much bigger? Her bruises in my opinion are perfectly consistent with someone who was just systematically whacked, maybe not life-threateningly all the time, but on a very regular basis, the same way someone would hit a dog.

I thought you said you had a life?

 

[tetrasect]

Not asking what she said I'm asking why didn't Amber put the original clear one in as her evidence?

Because the original shows that Depp had a black eye.

 

[Splinter]

Nope, I literally did not. The fact that to you, me disparaging a single female (proven in a court of law to be a liar) makes me a despiser of all women, reveals your gender/sex issues very clearly.

You man-haters are so blind it's comical

Oh yes, @C4Cat - Ms. Turd herself admitted she dropped a stinky-slinky in Depp's bed as a "joke". Hence the the wonderful juxtaposition of "turd" rhyming with her surname.

Simply poetic.

 

[2023]

Because the original shows that Depp had a black eye.

Exactly, she didn't put it in as evidence because it doesn't suit her story.

 

[lumeer]

As I said, you have no idea how PTSD victims should behave on stand. Your reaction is typical of the reason abusers get away with it so easily.

Perhaps Amber's behaviour on the stand during the first two days of her testimony was an expression of her trauma, but I think that the more likely explanation is that she was acting.

 

[cerebus]

Perhaps Amber's behaviour on the stand during the first two days of her testimony was an expression of her trauma, but I think that the more likely explanation is that she was acting.

Perhaps you have no idea what you're talking about and trials should be judged on evidence not performances. The ways people express trauma are multivarious and unpredictable.

 

[cerebus]

Oh yes, @C4Cat - Ms. Turd herself admitted she dropped a stinky-slinky in Depp's bed as a "joke"

Link?