-
Ask a question and get free supportUnlock new privileges and see hidden discussionsWin prizes and earn reputation
-
Question of the day ~ How often do you braai?
-
Afristay giveaway.Win a 2-night stay for two people at an establishment of your choice with R1,000 in spending money. Enter here.
Sign up with GoogleEXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp
- Thread starter jack_spratt
- Start date
Emjay
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2005
- Messages
- 15,016
What is a set back for abused women is for this gold digging psychopath pretending she was a victim. She lied multiple times. She is on recordings admitting to abusing Depp. She is not a victim.
Before she called the police on that infamous evening the woman was on the phone with her bloody divorce attorney. Tell us more about how abused she is when her priority call is a call to the divorce lawyer and not the cops or medical professionals. Bear in mind this is days after Franco was in the apartment, and while she was sleeping with Musk.
ShaunSA
Derailment Squad
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- Messages
- 49,775
I told you to step away. Sadly it's too late now
You will forever be known as Amber's turd force
I'm not wrong. What's more, people are beginning to realize what a creepy scumbag Depp is and how badly handled the US case was, and what a setback it will be for victims of abuse when defamation can be weaponized to silence them so effectively.
Press: The jury and I both got it wrong on Amber Heard
Last week in Washington, we saw something even more unusual than a total solar eclipse (which happens only every 360-410 years in a given location): a member of the president’s Cabinet publicly adm…thehill.com
Hey, what do you think of Depp's best friend btw? Birds of a feather, etc.
A Timeline of Abuse Allegations Against Marilyn Manson
In February 2021, ‘Westworld’ star Evan Rachel Wood named Marilyn Manson as her alleged abuser. Here’s what has happened since.www.billboard.com
Anyway I'm out of this thread. There's no benefit from it. If you can believe that Depp saying "If I'm the main culprit", it's actually proof that he's the real victim, I guess there's no getting through.
I'm sorry man, but you are truly ridiculous. At least you not having the character or integrity to admit you were wrong ties in with the deflection and avoidance you demonstrated this entire thread
But what if Amber really is on myBB? Maybe the turd is worth the squeeze?
I would also bail from all this after seeing how bad Amber's motion to set the trial aside was.
tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,105
Yip, even they are admitting she was not abused.
Instead they are trying to argue that she "believed" she was abused and that the fact that there was no actual abuse is irrelevant.
konfab
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 36,120
The US judge got it wrong
The Jury got it wrong.
All Depp's witnesses were liars.
Should be the easiest case for Amber Turd to appeal in US history.
Honestly that Hill article reads like someone who didn't watch the trial.
Lucas Buck
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
- Messages
- 5,628
That's such nonsense. It will most likely lead to more victims using the police and courts to address their abusers, rather than using the press to besmirch someones reputation. If you're going to use the press to accuse someone then use legal avenues as well.
The only way that this case will affect victims of abuse is if fear mongers use it to scare victims from coming forward. It's really disgusting how Heards supporters/pr team are trying to use fear in order to get people on her side.
Last edited:
tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,105
Except it's not defamation, because they were actually abused (unlike Amber).
Yip, even they are admitting she was not abused.
Instead they are trying to argue that she "believed" she was abused and that the fact that there was no actual abuse is irrelevant.
Seriously? I still need to go through the relevant clips etc.
tetrasect
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 9,105
Yip, page 33. They are now trying to prove that she "believed" she was abused, and doing a terrible job of that as well.
Howdy
Expert Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Messages
- 4,830
Why not call out his defense?
I've just watched the clip. This is truly the most disingenuous quoting of things out of context I have ever seen.
What is your job @cerebus ? I am thinking you are paid somehow for this BS you have posted.
You need a wake up call yourself.
I can’t with that!Yip, even they are admitting she was not abused.
Instead they are trying to argue that she "believed" she was abused and that the fact that there was no actual abuse is irrelevant.
Just could not believe how hard they are trying to get this thing to realstart.
I believe the earth is flat, just because you don’t and you can show all the evidence, it still doesn’t make what I believe in not true because I believe it..
Suddenly the op ed wasn’t about JD because she didn’t mention him although she testified it was him.
Seemed like AH wrote the whole thing and Elaine just added a few things to make it sound legit.. missing the point completely.
I can’t wait for the judge’s reply.
Wish we could see her face when she had to read this.
And @cerebus don’t come at us with:
Boohoo she couldn’t afford the best lawyers.. she went through 3 sets before settling on Elaine