EXCLUSIVE: 'I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.' LISTEN as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp

[G'Wobblez]

Oh gfy. First you claim there's nothing about Weinstein and Depp on the internet. Then you shift to say he wasn't covering for him when his interview obviously does imply that Weinstein wasn't an abuser because his wife was hot and he was a good dad. You're the one who's too lazy to do proper research or actually reconsider your own biases even slightly.

This level of ostrich-heading and sheer assholery towards me is more than I can break through. If something changes I'll come back here.

Wait wait.. I thought we were talking about MM. are we back on Weinstein now?
You don't post links just something and I say Bible and now I have to believe it?

You are now relying on swear words to try and make a point?
Calling me names?

No other argument. I'm 100% open to my mind being changed. You just don't succeed.
I look into everything you posted and I still do not find evidence of something you are trying to show.

The trial was about defamation. The Court found that it was defamation.
You create all kinds of strawmen that doesn't make sense?

 

[G'Wobblez]

Harvey Weinstein - The World's 100 Most Influential People: 2012 - TIME

Megamogul and Oscar whisperer

content.time.com

The Trouble With Johnny Depp

Multimillion-dollar lawsuits, a haze of booze and hash, a marriage gone very wrong and a lifestyle he can’t afford – inside the trials of Johnny Depp

www.rollingstone.com

He flips through the news and comes across a report on Harvey Weinstein. He shakes his head and calls him an ******* for burying his film Dead Man because director Jim Jarmusch refused to give up his contractually mandated final cut. “He was a bully,” says Depp. “Have you seen his wife? It’s not a wide range. It’s not like he went, ‘I must go to the Poconos to find some hairy-backed bitch.’ ”
Depp pauses, ruminating on whether he is being unkind. He mentions that once he tagged along as Weinstein was picking up his kid from school and that he could tell Weinstein really loved her. “The image that took my breath away was Harvey Weinstein, a goliath Shrek thing, bending down to put on his daughter’s raincoat.”

A small paragraph in a long article. He called W a Bully. Said he had a hot wife and loved his kids.
I do not understand how you connect that to him hitting AH?


The MM connection is more. I agree its more than the Weinstein connection. I also have people considered weird in my life. Do I know they abuse their wives? No. Do I suspect it no? Do I know they have a crazy life.. yes.
Do you know everything that happens behind closed doors of your friends?

I also think many people in Hollywood are linked to Weinstein and would rather shut up about it.

I do not see him defending MM. That is all I'm saying.

 

[cerebus]

Wait wait.. I thought we were talking about MM. are we back on Weinstein now?
You don't post links just something and I say Bible and now I have to believe it?

You are now relying on swear words to try and make a point?
Calling me names?

No other argument. I'm 100% open to my mind being changed. You just don't succeed.
I look into everything you posted and I still do not find evidence of something you are trying to show.

The trial was about defamation. The Court found that it was defamation.
You create all kinds of strawmen that doesn't make sense?

The first thing you did was attack me for lying about a link between Weinstein and Depp because you couldn't find it ANYWHERE on the internet. Then when I proved easily that there are plenty of connections, you just doubled down on your assholery towards me. I'm pretty done with that tbh, it's been the same since the moment I came on here. There's no need to treat me that way. I simply take one position and I think all the evidence points in one direction, i.e. overwhelmingly towards Depp as being the abuser in the relationship.

 

[G'Wobblez]

The first thing you did was attack me for lying about a link between Weinstein and Depp because you couldn't find it ANYWHERE on the internet. Then when I proved easily that there are plenty of connections, you just doubled down on your assholery towards me. I'm pretty done with that tbh, it's been the same since the moment I came on here. There's no need to treat me that way. I simply take one position and I think all the evidence points in one direction, i.e. overwhelmingly towards Depp as being the abuser in the relationship.

Where did I say you were lying?
I made an observation. I googled it and only found AH connections.
Gaslighting again?
Where did I double down on the assholery? You are pretty done? With what? Searching for something that doesn't exist?

I also see overwhelming evidence that AH is a narcissist and fabricated evidence to Try and BS everyone.

 

[G'Wobblez]

You sound like AH.
Just because I do not believe your stories doesn't mean You don't believe them.
Well ok.
We are just asking for evidence to back your claims. You are not giving any convincing evidence.
The stuff you gave were in the trial, and was debunked.

 

[G'Wobblez]

About once every week this thread pops up, and I'm amazed that people are still debating this.
Kinda like that Surtie scam one.

IT will not die cause AH will not let it go. The case is still ongoing. AH is still going on with her ****ery.

 

[Tman*]

This thread

 

[tetrasect]

The stuff you gave were in the trial, and was debunked.

Yet he posts it again and again as if it never was.

It's like a Trump supporter who believes all this election stolen BS. Each individual claim can be debunked but they don't care, cause they just see all the claims bunched together as "overwhelming" evidence.

And once they are in that mind-frame you can send them some random picture of a guy filling out a ballot with a caption saying he is a poll worker changing the votes from Trump to Biden and that's good enough for them. Goes straight onto the "undeniable evidence" pile since it fits so nicely with what they already believe.

 

[cerebus]

You sound like AH.
Just because I do not believe your stories doesn't mean You don't believe them.
Well ok.
We are just asking for evidence to back your claims. You are not giving any convincing evidence.
The stuff you gave were in the trial, and was debunked.

Nothing I gave was debunked. Just because you can throw mud at evidence doesn't mean you're debunking it. Here, debunk this.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451321096993652736

"You beat the **** out of me..." "I made a huge mistake"

"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead"

"You had your hands on me after you threw the phone at my face." "Oh my god."

Why doesn't Depp deny any of the things she says in private conversation? How do you even rationalise those conversations in your head to imagine that they could be anything other than an admittal of his abuse?

Look at the words in that transcript.

"You can throw a punch.... you can headbutt someone"
"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead".

He is acknowledging and admitting to her over the phone that he punched and headbutted her and trying to defend himself because he thinks a headbutt wouldn't cause a broken nose. If this hadn't happened he could have just said "wtf crazy bitch" and been done with it. I don't know how anyone can get past that in all honesty.


This is all so stupid. Once you've decided that Depp is innocent there's just no getting past it.

 

[Splinter]

Oh gfy. First you claim there's nothing about Weinstein and Depp on the internet. Then you shift to say he wasn't covering for him when his interview obviously does imply that Weinstein wasn't an abuser because his wife was hot and he was a good dad. You're the one who's too lazy to do proper research or actually reconsider your own biases even slightly.

This level of ostrich-heading and sheer assholery towards me is more than I can break through. If something changes I'll come back here.

Oh this is so precious!!!!

Talk about being blind, obstinate, ludicrous, ridiculous and just plain pig-headed!!!

 

[Splinter]

About once every week this thread pops up, and I'm amazed that people are still debating this.
Kinda like that Surtie scam one.

As has been said by others before, we are not debating - we are having fun with the obsessed cerebus

 

[Splinter]

The first thing you did was attack me for lying about a link between Weinstein and Depp because you couldn't find it ANYWHERE on the internet. Then when I proved easily that there are plenty of connections, you just doubled down on your assholery towards me. I'm pretty done with that tbh, it's been the same since the moment I came on here. There's no need to treat me that way. I simply take one position and I think all the evidence points in one direction, i.e. overwhelmingly towards Depp as being the abuser in the relationship.

You can't make this shyte up...oh wait, @cerebus can.

 

[YoungSandwich]

Nothing I gave was debunked. Just because you can throw mud at evidence doesn't mean you're debunking it. Here, debunk this.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451321096993652736

"You beat the **** out of me..." "I made a huge mistake"

"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead"

"You had your hands on me after you threw the phone at my face." "Oh my god."

Why doesn't Depp deny any of the things she says in private conversation? How do you even rationalise those conversations in your head to imagine that they could be anything other than an admittal of his abuse?

Look at the words in that transcript.

"You can throw a punch.... you can headbutt someone"
"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead".

He is acknowledging and admitting to her over the phone that he punched and headbutted her and trying to defend himself because he thinks a headbutt wouldn't cause a broken nose. If this hadn't happened he could have just said "wtf crazy bitch" and been done with it. I don't know how anyone can get past that in all honesty.


This is all so stupid. Once you've decided that Depp is innocent there's just no getting past it.

Easy: Hearsay.

 

[2023]

Nothing I gave was debunked. Just because you can throw mud at evidence doesn't mean you're debunking it. Here, debunk this.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451321096993652736

"You beat the **** out of me..." "I made a huge mistake"

"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead"

"You had your hands on me after you threw the phone at my face." "Oh my god."

Why doesn't Depp deny any of the things she says in private conversation?

Can't help but notice you didn't deny this:

Cerebus seems to be the most misogynistic here. Hasn't said a good thing about any of the women in this trial at all.

So... you are misogynistic as fact now?

 

[tetrasect]

Easy: Hearsay.

Heardsay.

 

[tetrasect]

Nothing I gave was debunked. Just because you can throw mud at evidence doesn't mean you're debunking it. Here, debunk this.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451321096993652736

"You beat the **** out of me..." "I made a huge mistake"

"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead"

"You had your hands on me after you threw the phone at my face." "Oh my god."

Why doesn't Depp deny any of the things she says in private conversation? How do you even rationalise those conversations in your head to imagine that they could be anything other than an admittal of his abuse?

Look at the words in that transcript.

"You can throw a punch.... you can headbutt someone"
"I headbutted you in the ****ing forehead".

He is acknowledging and admitting to her over the phone that he punched and headbutted her and trying to defend himself because he thinks a headbutt wouldn't cause a broken nose. If this hadn't happened he could have just said "wtf crazy bitch" and been done with it. I don't know how anyone can get past that in all honesty.


This is all so stupid. Once you've decided that Depp is innocent there's just no getting past it.

This doesn't even need debunking because every person with a sane mind knows that an accusatory statement is not itself evidence of the accusation and neither is "not denying it".

You on the other hand seem to have a big problem with this very simple concept.

The only thing he actually stated was that he headbutted her on the forehead by accident, which he also testified to in court.

 

[cerebus]

This doesn't even need debunking because every person with a sane mind knows that an accusatory statement is not itself evidence of the accusation and neither is "not denying it".

You on the other hand seem to have a big problem with this very simple concept.

The only thing he actually stated was that he headbutted her on the forehead by accident, which he also testified to in court.

Yeah no that's bollocks. Come on. Not only did he not deny it, he acknowledged what she said. It's right there. Him saying "I headbutted you in the forehead" is in response to her saying "You can punch someone... you can headbutt someone". Him saying "I made a huge mistake" is a response to her saying "You beat the **** out of me". Him saying "Oh my god" is a response to her saying "You threw a phone at my face".

As for headbutting her by accident, you honestly call that a rebuttal? Fk sake. So I can just say any words when I'm accused of something and that's good enough?

 

[tetrasect]

Yeah no that's bollocks. Come on. Not only did he not deny it, he acknowledged what she said. It's right there. Him saying "I headbutted you in the forehead" is in response to her saying "You can punch someone... you can headbutt someone". Him saying "I made a huge mistake" is a response to her saying "You beat the **** out of me". Him saying "Oh my god" is a response to her saying "You threw a phone at my face".

As for headbutting her by accident, you honestly call that a rebuttal? Fk sake.

That's not evidence. That's wild speculation.

So I can just say any words when I'm accused of something and that's good enough?

Yes.

There is no specific set of words you are required say in order not to be guilty of an accusation.

Do you even hear yourself? This is like kindergarten level stuff.

 

[Splinter]

Can't help but notice you didn't deny this:



So... you are misogynistic as fact now?

An extremely good point!!!!!

 

[Splinter]

Yeah no that's bollocks. Come on. Not only did he not deny it, he acknowledged what she said. It's right there. Him saying "I headbutted you in the forehead" is in response to her saying "You can punch someone... you can headbutt someone". Him saying "I made a huge mistake" is a response to her saying "You beat the **** out of me". Him saying "Oh my god" is a response to her saying "You threw a phone at my face".

As for headbutting her by accident, you honestly call that a rebuttal? Fk sake. So I can just say any words when I'm accused of something and that's good enough?

You quoting things out of context again?

Don't forget your monumental sneaky move of dropping the "if" in your previous holy grail clip of evidence