F1 2019 season discussion and chat.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Agent_Smith

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
18,126
As excellent as the race was, I fear that it may be a temporary scenario. The Mercs battled in the oppressive heat of Austria but once temperatures return to 'normal', I think the status quo will be restored. I can't imagine that Sunday was a proper reflection of where the teams are. If it is though, then we are in for a cracker second half of the season.
 

Fox1

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
5,408
Looks like the stewards paid back Max for not penalising HAM back in Monaco. Sure rubbing is racing, but that's never been allowed in F1 this season until now and then the stewards want to talk about consistency.

Anyways, good luck to Max from here. That Honda engine was running at 11 most of the last bit.
 

thestaggy

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
21,147
Looks like the stewards paid back Max for not penalising HAM back in Monaco. Sure rubbing is racing, but that's never been allowed in F1 this season until now and then the stewards want to talk about consistency.

Anyways, good luck to Max from here. That Honda engine was running at 11 most of the last bit.

Could also be a response to the Canada fallout and the borefest that was France.

Granted there is zero consistency - there was actual contact yesterday while none in Canada - but I think its hitting home; F1 is boring and more action is required on the track. Unless a driver is seriously out of order, they cannot afford to police every aspect of the racing.
 

Fox1

Executive Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
5,408
Absurdities aside, Honda have proven that a new engine manufacturer can come into F1 and build a competitive engine. I wonder if Honda are licking their lips at a works team in the future?
 

Naks

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
7,787
Absurdities aside, Honda have proven that a new engine manufacturer can come into F1 and build a competitive engine. I wonder if Honda are licking their lips at a works team in the future?


and McLaren must be so happy about this :ROFL:
 

crysis

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
3,463
Looks like the stewards paid back Max for not penalising HAM back in Monaco. Sure rubbing is racing, but that's never been allowed in F1 this season until now and then the stewards want to talk about consistency.

Anyways, good luck to Max from here. That Honda engine was running at 11 most of the last bit.
None of the recent events were the same as what happened to Max vs Lec. You can't compare the two. As the stewards have said you have to look at this at a case by case bassis. If anything Lec was partially to blame for the contact too, so in your mind they both should be awarded a 5 sec penalty. In which case it makes no difference.
 

upup

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
9,030
I heard Verstappen ask for power, the team told him to press some numbers. Was that kind off thing not stopped?
 

caroper

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2003
Messages
8,170
I heard Verstappen ask for power, the team told him to press some numbers. Was that kind off thing not stopped?
They told him to "FAIL" something, that normally means that a sensor has gone faulty and the ECU is trying to compensate for a non existent condition. Effectively they asked him to shut something down.

They did ban all radio comm's at one stage to prevent "coaching" but it raised too many safety concerns with the complexity of the Hybrid Power Units so now the engineers can tell them to switch settings, as they are not allowed to do so remotely, but they can't preempt the driver and it must address a safety issue.

That said I am no expert, the above is just my understanding, so I am open to correction if anyone has the full facts.

.
 

Düber

Expert Member
Joined
May 17, 2018
Messages
2,619
I heard it was an exhaust sensor that packed up and they had to switch to the backup, as to the rules... it is probably better for the sport with more cars running.
 

caroper

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2003
Messages
8,170
Just one question, being a ferrari car do they all start with 5s penalties or are the penalties dished out randomly throughout the race?
No that car is from the earlier era when Ferrari were exempt from penalties and McLaren had to ask the FIA for permission to overtake a Ferrari.
 

caroper

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2003
Messages
8,170
A textual explanation for the confused:

two laps from the finish, Schumacher was issued with a stop-and-go penalty for passing Alexander Wurz under the safety car on lap 43. He had to come in to the pits within three laps to serve his penalty, which he did by entering the pit lane on the final lap of the race, but in doing so he crossed the finish line, which extends across the pit lane, before reaching his pit box, and won the race possibly without having served his penalty. His team argued that the penalty should have been issued within 25 minutes of the incident but instead they were informed after 31 minutes. They also argued that the hand-written notification was unclear as to which penalty was actually being issued: a stop-and-go, or a 10-second addition to Schumacher's race time. The stewards then decided to apply the 10-second addition, post-race. However, the added time penalty can only be used to punish an infraction in the last 12 laps of a Grand Prix, and so did not apply here. The stewards eventually rescinded the penalty altogether.[3] A protest was lodged by McLaren-Mercedes who felt Ferrari cheated by not having Schumacher serve the penalty, but this was rejected by the FIA. As a result, the three stewards involved handed in their licenses at an extraordinary meeting of the FIA World Council.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top