F1 2021: New season discussion and chat

Status
Not open for further replies.

Willie Trombone

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
60,038
Pretty amazing that he was able to extract such abnormal performance from his car at that moment. If only he was able to brake as hard at other times he'd be unbeatable
2.4 Gs while already driving slowly is considerable. That's called erratic braking - it's unexpected.
He was trying to make Lewis do something he didn't want to do. He was trying to control the race, sadly he chose to drive erratically. If he'd used his head, he would have just carried on driving slowly until Lewis was instructed to take the place or take a penalty for slow driving himself, but Max doesn't think with his head sometimes. He's not a prost, he's more a senna. Put two of those on the track and that's what you get.
 

Speedster

Honorary Master
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
21,684
2.4 Gs while already driving slowly is considerable. That's called erratic braking - it's unexpected.
He was trying to make Lewis do something he didn't want to do. He was trying to control the race, sadly he chose to drive erratically. If he'd used his head, he would have just carried on driving slowly until Lewis was instructed to take the place or take a penalty for slow driving himself, but Max doesn't think with his head sometimes. He's not a prost, he's more a senna. Put two of those on the track and that's what you get.
I thought you said 2.4G was beyond normal braking for an F1 car?
 

thestaggy

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
21,147
You can say what should've been but that's still irrelevant. You're arguing what someone should do in order to avoid what shouldn't have occurred.

Yes. Following a slowing car instead of overtaking is something that should not have happened.

By slowing down, Max, up until the last moments when he braked excessively, was complying and attempting to yield position.
 

Naks

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
7,785
dyc3djlpg5481.jpg
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,528
Pretty amazing that he was able to extract such abnormal performance from his car at that moment. If only he was able to brake as hard at other times he'd be unbeatable

If I knew what you were trying to say I'd possibly have a reply.
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,031
Yes. Following a slowing car instead of overtaking is something that should not have happened.

By slowing down, Max, up until the last moments when he braked excessively, was complying and attempting to yield position.
Strategically choosing the time to overtake a slower vehicle is perfectly legal within the context of this situation. Breaking erratically is not. The issue is not with either driving slowing down - it was the erratic breaking leading to a collision. Hence... The.. Penalty.
 

Willie Trombone

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
60,038

After the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix Helmut Marko was quick to point the finger at Lewis Hamilton for his collision Max Verstappen's Red Bull. However, the Austrian team's advisor now has to admit he was wrong.
On the radio, Hamilton spoke of a brake test by Verstappen, prompting Marko to say in front of the cameras that there was no brake test and that the brake pressure remained the same according to the data of the Red Bull engineers. According to Marko, Hamilton had simply misjudged the situation.
Later at the stewards' meeting it became clear that Verstappen did apply his brakes harder when Hamilton was right behind him, which earned the Red Bull driver a ten second time penalty. Marko therefore had to retract his statements. "At the time of the television interviews, I passed on exactly the information I had received from the engineers beforehand," he told F1 Insider. "That was obviously not correct, so I'm sorry for that."
 

Willie Trombone

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
60,038
A video from 2019 shows various drivers reacting to the incident between Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost during the 1990 Japanese Grand Prix. The race was marred by a collision between the two rivals, which decided the world championship. Senna became world champion for the second time after both drivers were unable to complete the race due to damage to the cars. In 1989, another collision between the two resulted in championship success for the Frenchman.

Verstappen and Pierre Gasly watch the video just like Carlos Sainz and Lando Norris. In response, the Dutchman asks Gasly, "What would you have done in this scenario?" He admits that he would have done the same after which the Dutchman says: "I mean why not?".
...
Guess what we have to look forward to next race?
 

Agent_Smith

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
18,126
A video from 2019 shows various drivers reacting to the incident between Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost during the 1990 Japanese Grand Prix. The race was marred by a collision between the two rivals, which decided the world championship. Senna became world champion for the second time after both drivers were unable to complete the race due to damage to the cars. In 1989, another collision between the two resulted in championship success for the Frenchman.

Verstappen and Pierre Gasly watch the video just like Carlos Sainz and Lando Norris. In response, the Dutchman asks Gasly, "What would you have done in this scenario?" He admits that he would have done the same after which the Dutchman says: "I mean why not?".
...
Guess what we have to look forward to next race?

I asked this a few posts ago...
 

Willie Trombone

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
60,038

Martin Brundle has spoken in his column for Sky Sports of his admiration for the qualities of Max Verstappen, but finds it unfortunate that the Red Bull Racing driver is tempted to commit 'professional transgressions'.

'I'm in awe of Verstappen's driving skills and racing nous, and have championed him since the Chinese Grand Prix of 2015 when he was in the Toro Rosso. His touch and control behind the wheel is something to behold, but it saddens me that he's resorting to such tactics, he's better than that.''

''And for all his carefree attitude it will be such a shame if his legacy is to be labelled as an unfair driver. Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher had their faults too, and I was on the receiving end from both of them on occasions, but it's a sizeable dent on their immense reputations, not a positive''
, concludes Brundle.
 

Sinbad

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
81,151

Martin Brundle has spoken in his column for Sky Sports of his admiration for the qualities of Max Verstappen, but finds it unfortunate that the Red Bull Racing driver is tempted to commit 'professional transgressions'.

'I'm in awe of Verstappen's driving skills and racing nous, and have championed him since the Chinese Grand Prix of 2015 when he was in the Toro Rosso. His touch and control behind the wheel is something to behold, but it saddens me that he's resorting to such tactics, he's better than that.''

''And for all his carefree attitude it will be such a shame if his legacy is to be labelled as an unfair driver. Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher had their faults too, and I was on the receiving end from both of them on occasions, but it's a sizeable dent on their immense reputations, not a positive''
, concludes Brundle.
Lol and even with that "sizeable dent" they are much better regarded than Brundle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top