Like i said, only an issue when it affects Lewis
Why was Lewis given a warning by the stewards in the latter part of the race?
Like i said, only an issue when it affects Lewis
Why was Lewis given a warning by the stewards in the latter part of the race?
So you're a kid playing TV games then? Welcome to the forum. Does mom know you're on here? Do we have to add spoiler tags to the naughty posts in here?I'd rather be a kid playing tv games then support that chump
Sir Loser Po3silton does it again, rules favouring the chump...
Easily more for then against.Hamilton has got his fair share of penalties throughout his career. Some people seem to think that the FIA has some sort of conspiracy to allow him to win, lol.
But naturally, the legends do attract hate.
Bottas will be fighting for third with Sainz.I think I am going to place a bet on a Bottas drivers championship this year. If racing will be that close for the year between Hamilton and Verstappen, they will cancel each other out at some races and Bottas just has to be there to pick up the pieces a la Kimi in 2007 when Hamilton and Alonso were going at it
Edit: Outside bet that is...
Nah, he's the best.Easily more for then against.
Hamilton is the blue eyed boy...
Smug, kak attitude... since joining brawn he has been absolutely unbearable.
Good racer- yes, best in the field-not by a long shot.
Well, they did go over the radio and say he'd broken track limits and the next time he did so he'd get a waved chequered flag.So someone keen on reddit posted a video that shows Hamilton went wide in turn 4 29 times. The bestest driver just likes that route more because it is more scenic of course, not because he was able to extract an advantage out of it. So you're sitting with a situation where either the rules changed mid race, or the stewards magically remembered article 27.3 mid race and now felt like enforcing it while giving the people who had abused it up until then a free pass.
I'm actually wondering if the FIA do this stuff deliberately since they know it has a high change of creating controversy
Well, they did go over the radio and say he'd broken track limits and the next time he did so he'd get a waved chequered flag.
SO...the question is this: If he did so multiple times, how much time did he either make up between him and Max, or add to the distance with Max behind him?
Verstappen clearly had tyre issues those final few laps, but he was passed Hamilton into that corner.
Then I wonder why RBR aren't taking this up with the race authorities. But it's too late...RB reckon it's 0.2s per lap that you gain by extending in turn 4... even if we make this 0.1s, thats essentially 3 seconds gained over the race.
The race director himself said that all cars with one exception were respecting the track limits there... so this BS about it being within the rules doesn't add up.
Quote please.The race director himself said that all cars with one exception were respecting the track limits there... so this BS about it being within the rules doesn't add up.
If you think Hamilton gained an advantage, then you have to hand it to him - that's a pretty good way to make up time when you're clearly .1-.5 off the normal pace of your rival.Hamilton ran wide beyond the extremities of the track boundary at the same corner 29 times throughout the 56-lap race before he was warned by his race engineer Pete Bonnington that he was in danger of receiving a time penalty at mid-distance if he continued to abuse the exit.
The seven-time world champion admitted he was left confused by this instruction and correctly pointed out that before the race it was communicated that track limits would not be policed at Turn 4, unlike in FP2, FP3 and qualifying when such an offence resulted in lap times being deleted.
Hamilton was among a number of drivers who regularly ran wide while exiting Turn 4 during the race and at one stage Red Bull even informed Verstappen to do the same.
Red Bull F1 team principal Christian Horner was left frustrated by what he described as being the “shade of grey” nature of the track limits rules, though he did accept that the decision to penalise Verstappen was technically correct.
Moving to address the confusion after the race, Masi explained that Verstappen’s Turn 4 excursion was ruled to be illegal due to a key distinction in what is deemed as ‘gaining an advantage’.
Masi stressed it was made “very clear” in the pre-event notes and also in the drivers’ briefing on Friday evening that “if an overtake takes place with a car off track and gains a lasting advantage, I will go on the radio and suggest to the team that they immediately relinquish that position.
“With regard to tolerance given with people running outside of the track limits during the race, that was mentioned very clearly in the meeting and the notes that it would not be monitored with regard to setting the lap time, so to speak, but it will always be monitored in according with the Sporting Regulations that a lasting advantage overall must not be gained.”