How the Managing Director of Renault's F1 Team Wants to Radically Change the Sport
Maybe we need to go towards shorter races. Maybe we need to have visual elements on the cars that are really impressive. I don't know if you know the old video game, Wipeout—maybe that should be the vision of Formula 1. I'm exaggerating, but not that much. It's full of light, it's full of color, it's full of different types of noises. Sometimes you have a booster, but then it's like Mario Kart, and you don't want to go in that direction. Although, we already go a little bit in that direction. But in my opinion, we are a bit too shy, we don't do it in the right way. What I mean is, if you look at the importance of tire management, it's absolutely crazy. It's important to have the tires create some excitement, create some show, create overtaking opportunities and gradient of speed. But there could be a different way to do that, through management of energy, for instance, and that could be much more exciting. And if we really push that we could have a very big gradient of speed that would make overtaking maneuvers just fantastic. I think there are some things intrinsic to motorsports that we cannot alter, but there are an awful lot of things we can do in order to match the expectation of people who are used to sports that are constantly pushing the boundaries.
...
I fully agree that's an option. In a couple of years we will be surrounded by autonomous driving, so our experience with cars will be completely the same. All cars will have the same technology. So when we are watching Formula 1, we will be wanting to see something completely different. Why not low tech? Or we have to go to the other extreme, which is massively high-tech, but again, a high-tech that is visible from the outside.
...
That's why your point about low tech is a very good one. Maybe we will need a Formula 1 that is completely different from our experience with cars, because cars will be completely different. So maybe that's the vision of Formula 1, interestingly. But I would say that's a bit of a bullish idea right now because right now the model is based on financial support from all these tech companies.
...
Yeah, absolutely. They should sort out their issues themselves—including on the track. I think we should have a governing body that is less quick to interfere. It also means having the capacity to have drivers who are maybe a bit older. Maybe our junior series, feeder series, should be a bit longer. Because it's true, when you take a driver at 17 years old, he doesn't have an awful lot of things to say—his life has been fairly short up to that point. I think that, in general, our drivers are too young. If you compare to the drivers in American motorsports, those guys are grown men. Think about Senna, Prost. That's missing. We just signed a driver who is 29 years old [Ed. note: Nico Hulkenberg], and a number of people have made the observation that maybe he is too old for the job. Frankly, that's bull****, if you'll excuse my French. He has the perfect balance of experience, he's very capable. Look at one of the most exciting drivers on the grid, Fernando Alonso. He's 35, he's a grown man, and he's very exciting. He's the type of person that you would want to have dinner with. That's what we need.