Mate, a crime was committed. He ran over children with his car. Whether you feel that way is immaterial. The courts will establish facts and rule accordingly. If it was a genuine mistake, then he'll be tried for something less severe.
Your self pity serves no purpose to the case.
A suggestion: that's for the court to decide, if a crime was committed, or if it was an accident. Innocent until proven guilty. Yet have already decided?
Already the whole thing is being racialized and politicized. Once that happens, any possibility of real justice leaves to be replaced by bush justice. Already we see the NPA claiming, as a statement of fact, the kids were playing.
Tell us more...
Why do you feel that way? Give examples where a black murderer was acquitted despite glaring evidence against them.
Are we talking about murder or something less. Also, no need to acquit if we don't even investigate and arrest. Or will you try deny that as well? Have you already forgotten tensions that led to an overturned police van that self-combusted, investigations that never happened?
And yes, Coligny is an excellent example. Have you learnt nothing from the Coka brothers incident either?
In fact, considering what has come out, why is this guy not out on bail?
Just Friday evening, a victim was laughed at in Rawsonville by Minsister Shurrup's finest, chased away. Of course, nothing can happen in South Africa if you don't have a case number, a CAS. The victims had to drive all the way though to Worcester the Saturday. This is a regular occurrence.
Atm, the first step in initializing and prioritizing a case depends on the melanin of the claimed perp vs the claimed victim. If the claimed perp is a pale male farmer, bonus points, the priority goes up by an order of magnitude. Much like our BEE/AA charts, and it's driven by political cretins in power.