First evidence that sperm epigenetics affect the next generation.

ɹǝuuᴉM

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
3,604
I am not allowed to. However, you get the idea what the article tries to convene. My point is proven. Epigenetics is here to stay.
 

Ancalagon

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
18,140
I nearly RBP'ed you for that post.

You are allowed to post a summary of the article in your own words. If you aren't willing to, I'll ask a mod to close the thread.

Cos right now I have no idea what you are talking about.
 

bradrap

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2005
Messages
852
SPERM pass on more than just their DNA. Chemical switches attached to the genomes of sperm – known as epigenetic tags – have been shown to alter the next generation for the first time.

The discovery could explain how a father’s experiences may later affect gene activity in their offspring, a vital step towards improving health and fertility.

Throughout life, our environment changes the activity of our genes, switching them on or off without altering DNA. It does this by epigenetics – adding or removing regulatory chemical tags. Both smoking and diet can alter which genes are tagged in this way, and epigenetic changes have also been linked to cancer.

Over the past decade, a handful of studies have suggested that environmental stressors experienced by parents can also affect the health of their children and even grandchildren[/a]. One controversial mouse study suggested that even the fear of a particular smell can be passed down epigenetically.

“The implication is that a father’s experiences might affect their offspring’s characteristics”

Sperm and egg genes can carry epigenetic tags, but it has been difficult to show that these affect offspring. Now Jerome Jullien at the Wellcome Trust CRUK Gurdon Institute in Cambridge and his colleagues have shown for the first time that sperm epigenetic tags do change gene expression in embryos – and that these tags are essential for healthy development.

They made their discovery by comparing frog embryos made from sperm with those made from spermatids, a type of sperm precursor cell. The embryos made from sperm ...

stupid website
 

Indigogirl

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
3,386
Requires me to register

Fail

/leaves
You aren't registered for New Scientist? It is free, easy to do and affords access to a whole load of very interesting stuff.

The beginning paragraphs of the article:

SPERM pass on more than just their DNA. Chemical switches attached to the genomes of sperm – known as epigenetic tags – have been shown to alter the next generation for the first time.

The discovery could explain how a father’s experiences may later affect gene activity in their offspring, a vital step towards improving health and fertility.

Throughout life, our environment changes the activity of our genes, switching them on or off without altering DNA. It does this by epigenetics – adding or removing regulatory chemical tags. Both smoking and diet can alter which genes are tagged in this way, and epigenetic changes have also been linked to cancer.

Over the past decade, a handful of studies have suggested that environmental stressors experienced by parents can also affect the health of their children and even grandchildren. One controversial mouse study suggested that even the fear of a particular smell can be passed down epigenetically (see “Sins of the grandfather“).

The last couple of paragraphs:
However, he says it is not clear whether the findings tell us anything about how traits acquired through a father’s life might be passed on, because the team did not look at frogs that had been exposed to different environments.

And there is another hurdle. Many researchers are not convinced that epigenetic changes can affect the next generation. After conception, all epigenetic marks are thought to be wiped clean, leaving the embryo with a blank slate. There is evidence that a few tags can escape such reprogramming, and the new findings suggest that it is important that they do, but Timothy Bestor at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, says he is still very sceptical. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof,” he says.

The jury remains out but it is interesting nonetheless. Cellular memory is potentially a powerful thing and I see no reason why it is not possible.
Source: New Scientist
 
Last edited:

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
stupid website

How is this new?

It has been proven before that generations carry experiences through their offspring.

That is where Phobias come from iirc. I remember reading an article about it many years ago. :confused:
 

Bobbin

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
9,477
It seems highly unlikely to me. Emotions can have physiological effects sure, but that these are then somehow imprinted on unrelated cells in the body in such an accurate/direct manner? This would blow my mind.
 

Nerfherder

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
29,703
How is this new?

It has been proven before that generations carry experiences through their offspring.

That is where Phobias come from iirc. I remember reading an article about it many years ago. :confused:

I have heard of eugenics before but it is controversial. I think what's new is the evidence is coming out.

I don't think you are right about phobias though
 

Pitbull

Verboten
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
64,307
I have heard of eugenics before but it is controversial. I think what's new is the evidence is coming out.

I don't think you are right about phobias though

I read a scientific article about it. Something about inheriting fears. Maybe not Phobia per se, but fears we inherited from our forefathers. Like fear of Snakes, dark quiet areas and the likes. I'll try find it quickly.

Not the article I read but it was along these lines:

http://www.livescience.com/2348-fear-snakes.html
Fear of snakes is one of the most common phobias, yet many people have never seen a snake in person. So how is this fear generated?

New research suggests humans have evolved an innate tendency to sense snakes — and spiders, too — and to learn to fear them.
 
Last edited:

Aquila ka Hecate

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
6,770
I have heard of eugenics before but it is controversial. I think what's new is the evidence is coming out.

I don't think you are right about phobias though


Please, "epigenetics", not "eugenics" which is something completely different and far nastier.

Pitbull may have been reading something from the leftover hangers-on of Lamarckism, I don't know.
 
Top