About to take the plunge and buy my first house. Have found the process a little deurmekaar and not very clear.
Offer amount
Structure of finance, in this case deposit (more than 50%) in cash and the rest bond.
Offer expiry date
Occupational rent
etc....
Reviewed the OTP this morning and saw the below clause.
Second clause that caught my attention
Questions
- I have found a house that I like and thats within what I think I can afford (deposit and bond pre approval)
- Done a walk around
- Decided to submit a OTP (offer to purchase)
Offer amount
Structure of finance, in this case deposit (more than 50%) in cash and the rest bond.
Offer expiry date
Occupational rent
etc....
Reviewed the OTP this morning and saw the below clause.
Second clause that caught my attention
Questions
- For the first clause. Does this mean I would be liable to pay any shortfall that the bond doesn’t cover? If so doesn’t seem fair.
- As I understand the second clause, if the contract is breached (I don't get a full bond per say, and it no longer becomes affordable for me) I could be liable to pay the estate agent their commission and could be held liable to cover any sellers expenses.
- Are these type of inclusions normal?
- I have crossed them out and the estate agent is inviting the second one remains in place? Any advice
- Can I ask to have some text added to the second clause to stipulate that this is only applicable once the bond is approved and I have accepted it?
- Whats my bond acceptance likelihood, have worked for the same company for 3+ years. Putting down 54% of the cost upfront in cash. Clear credit history?