ThinkCentre
Expert Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 2,993
I am willing to pay 10% more!
Artificial limit.There is a limited number of licences available from ICASA so the simple answer is not really
Wonder if this applies to Elon![]()
There is a limited number of licences available from ICASA so the simple answer is not really
Sophistry Squad activate!MyBB equivocator members assemble!
In 3...2...1...
The ANC was always about a country for blacks and not an equal society. Pretty soon the rest of the world will see and know it as well.Racism usually turns out to be a disaster, I thought that was already established a couple of decades ago.
and that's the real problem. It's not about black ownership being disastrous. It's giving away shareholding to random people that's disastrousYou can't just "give" a shareholding of an existing company to someone for nothing. There are massive tax consequences involved if shares are not disposed of at market-related prices.
Starlink will have to register an entity here in the case they have not done so already, so, yes, it will apply to SpaceX/Starlink unless they decide to distribute and sell their product via a channel, which I doubt, since 'Musk Companies' do maintain ownership and control where a service is rendered, but in the case, it does the resellers or integrators will have to abide, but in Starlink’s case their turnover here will in any case be within the empowerment scale hence BB-BEE compliance will be a requirement. It wouldn't concern them as they would already have an appropriate empowered shareholder relationship in place, besides they will even use it to promote their service and brand.
Hypothetically, let's say Starlink establishes a local branch in South Africa and its ownership is, well, Starlink in USA. This In effect would mean the South Africa branch is not a separate entity.Starlink will have to register an entity here in the case they have not done so already, so, yes, it will apply to SpaceX/Starlink unless they decide to distribute and sell their product via a channel, which I doubt, since 'Musk Companies' do maintain ownership and control where a service is rendered, but in the case, it does the resellers or integrators will have to abide, but in Starlink’s case their turnover here will in any case be within the empowerment scale hence BB-BEE compliance will be a requirement. It wouldn't concern them as they would already have an appropriate empowered shareholder relationship in place, besides they will even use it to promote their service and brand.